Regional Goods Movement Study for the San Francisco Bay Area: Regional Goods Movement Study for the San Francisco Bay Area presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with Hausrath Economics Group The Tioga Group Dowling Associates February 25, 2003


All Businesses/Consumers Rely on Goods Movement, But What are Economic Hot Buttons?: All Businesses/Consumers Rely on Goods Movement, But What are Economic Hot Buttons? Goods movement businesses (carriers, warehouse/DC, logistics services) Jobs/communities impacted (880 corridor, South SF) Trends affecting location (Safeway example) Opportunities for value and job growth (value-added distribution) Significant industries where transportation affects location


All Businesses/Consumers Rely on Goods Movement, But What are Economic Hot Buttons?: All Businesses/Consumers Rely on Goods Movement, But What are Economic Hot Buttons? Trade Unique features of Bay Area Ports Competitive issues Growth in air cargo


How Should MTC Allocate Funds to Goods Movement?: How Should MTC Allocate Funds to Goods Movement? Most RTP funds are already planned or programmed How do freight needs overlap with passenger needs? New revenue opportunities RTP emphasizes maintenance and operations Traffic operations for freight (I-880 Corridor example) Private sector solutions (FedEx staging in South SF) Public/private ITS solutions (Synchro Met example) Innovative modal services (CIRIS, Napa/Solano rail) Look at goods movement system through eyes of the users Market segments (long haul, parcel, construction, drayage, etc.) Customer requirements (timing, equipment choices)


Reauthorization and Statewide Policy Issues: Reauthorization and Statewide Policy Issues Freight funding User fees Gateway funding Funding for rail investments (e.g., rail shuttle projects, public-private) AASHTO Rail Freight Bottom Line, Mid-Atlantic Rail Project earmarking – Where is the competition? Global Gateways and ITIP Funding


Overview of the Team: Overview of the Team Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Project Management Freight Data Freight and Economic Development Freight Policy Key Staff: Michael Fischer, Project Manager Christopher Wornum, Principal-in-Charge The Tioga Group Industry Knowledge Trucking, Ports and Rail Logistics Trends Key Staff: Dan Smith, Steve Nieman Hausrath Economics Group Land Use Economic and Community Development Key Staff: Linda Hausrath Dowling Associates Traffic Operations Transportation Engineering Key Staff: Mark Bowman


Overview of Approach: Overview of Approach Phase I Phase II


Freight Transportation System Data and Trends : Freight Transportation System Data and Trends


The Goods Movement IndustryHighway Infrastructure and Truck Operations: The Goods Movement Industry Highway Infrastructure and Truck Operations


Economic Impacts and Clusters – Goods Movement Dependent Industries: Economic Impacts and Clusters – Goods Movement Dependent Industries Supporting Industries Supporting Industries Supporting Industries Industry Clusters


Infrastructure and Business Environment: Infrastructure and Business Environment


Slide12: Interregional, Interstate, and International Transportation Needs for Key Industries


Land Use and Community Impacts: Land Use and Community Impacts Impacts of economy and real estate market on location of goods movement industry Community attitudes and local land use policy Tax base advantages from switching land out of transportation uses Future development patterns and goods movement industry


Stakeholder Interviews and Issues: Stakeholder Interviews and Issues Stakeholder groups CTA, commercial truckers, private fleet owners Port/airport, ocean carriers, terminal operators, air cargo operators Class I and shortline railroads Local electeds and planners Shippers Warehousing and distribution industry Issue areas Infrastructure needs Operational problems Land use and regulatory issues Institutional/Governance Funding and Finance


Assessing Issues and Strategies/Solutions: Assessing Issues and Strategies/Solutions Develop solutions and compile evaluative information Relate solutions to implementation issues and likelihood of success Construct performance measures where possible Conduct workshop/charette


Related Goods Movement Studies: Related Goods Movement Studies


National Efforts with Regional Significance: National Efforts with Regional Significance National Cooperative Highway Research Projects 8-39 – Financing and Improving Land Access to U.S. Cargo Hubs 8-42 – Freight Movement by Rail, Impacts and Opportunities 8-43 – Methods for Forecasting Statewide Freight Movements and Related Performance Measures 8-36(A), Task 33 – Best Practices for Statewide Freight Planning AASHTO Freight Rail Bottom Line Report U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Port and Intermodal Access Needs


National Efforts with Regional Significance (cont.): National Efforts with Regional Significance (cont.) FHWA Freight Analysis Framework Freight Professional Capacity Building NHS Connector Study Transportation Security Agency, Operation Safe Commerce TEA-21 Reauthorization


Statewide Studies/Programs: Statewide Studies/Programs Global Gateways Development Program State Rail Plan Freight Rail Plan Freight Movement Cost Benefit Study ITMS Statewide Freight Forecast


Northern California – Representative Completed Studies: Northern California – Representative Completed Studies MTC/BCDC Cargo Forecast Update MTC I-880 Corridor Truck Access Study Port of Oakland CIRIS White Paper San Joaquin Valley Goods Movement Study, Phase I Central Stanislaus Freight Study BCDC Bulk Cargo Forecast Oakland Port Services Location Study


Northern California – Representative Ongoing Studies: Northern California – Representative Ongoing Studies San Joaquin Valley Goods Movement Study, Phase II Port of Oakland/Caltrans/SJ Valley COGs CIRIS Market Feasibility Study Port of Stockton Rail Shuttle Study SJ COG Inland Port Study Napa/Solano County Passenger and Freight Rail Study Alameda CMA North I-880 Operations and Safety Study


Southern California Goods Movement Studies: Southern California Goods Movement Studies Alameda Corridor SCAG Goods Movement White Paper MTA/SCAG/Caltrans/FHWA Southern California Goods Movement Case Study SCAG Heavy Duty Truck Model Sub-Regional Goods Movement Studies Rail Capacity/Truck-Rail Diversion Studies


Southern California Goods Movement Studies (cont.): Southern California Goods Movement Studies (cont.) Truck Lanes/Corridor Studies SR-60 Truck Lane Feasibility Study I-710 Major Corridor Study I-15 Corridor Study


TEA-21 Reauthorization: TEA-21 Reauthorization


The $64 Million Question – What Will the New Surface Transportation Bill Hold in Store for Ports and Freight Transportation?: The $64 Million Question – What Will the New Surface Transportation Bill Hold in Store for Ports and Freight Transportation? Some themes are emerging Freight transportation will see increased emphasis The effort to create options for public-private partnerships will require creative approaches to financing Multimodal freight interests will still be viewed with suspicion by traditional highway lobbies – but there is hope!


What Stakeholders Said in FHWA Outreach: What Stakeholders Said in FHWA Outreach Solutions will involve new capacity coupled with improved operation Improve intermodal connections to enhance connectivity, interoperability Improve state and MPO planning and financing mechanisms for freight Support multi-state coalitions to deal with corridor and regional trade/transportation issues Better enable public/private financing and other innovative finance approaches for freight More federal leadership needed given multiple modes, jurisdictions, private stakeholders, international considerations, and national security implications


Some Perspectives on Funding: Some Perspectives on Funding Basic funding categories/revenue sources and funding structure unlikely to change Highway Trust Fund Apportionment categories Discretionary earmarks


Some Perspectives on Funding (cont.): Some Perspectives on Funding (cont.) Some new funding sources may be proposed by stakeholders Indexing gas tax Recovery of ethanol tax exemptions National Transportation Finance Corporation How will freight projects get more money? Discretionary projects New funding categories (e.g., set asides) – Affects existing apportionments Changing eligibility rules (e.g., broaden STP eligibility, modify TIFIA, add gateways to Sec. 1118/1119) Changes in planning process – More effectively compete for existing funds


Freight Reauthorization Ideas: Freight Reauthorization Ideas Improve Freight Financing Flexibility for intermodal freight in existing Fed-aid programs (e.g., CMAQ, STP) Innovative Finance (e.g., TIFIA for freight) More emphasis on NHS intermodal connectors Expand Borders/Corridors to include Gateways/Hubs Improve State/MPO freight planning, including public/private collaboration Improve data and analytical tools Need freight professional capacity building Focus on Operations/Technology/Security