logging in or signing up Barish Industry 06 05 Jeremiah Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 100 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 09, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide1: The ILC Global Design Effort Barry Barish ILC Industrial Forum Japan 28-June-05Why e+e- Collisions?: Why e+e- Collisions? elementary particles well-defined energy, angular momentum uses full COM energy produces particles democratically can mostly fully reconstruct events Slide3: A Rich History as a Powerful ProbeSlide4: The Energy FrontierWhy a TeV Scale e+e- Accelerator?: Why a TeV Scale e+e- Accelerator? Two parallel developments over the past few years (the technology) Designs and technology demonstrations have matured on two technical approaches for an e+e- collider that are well matched to our present understanding of the physics. Slide6: GLC GLC/NLC Concept The main linacs operate at an unloaded gradient of 65 MV/m, beam-loaded to 50 MV/m. The rf systems for 500 GeV c.m. consist of 4064 75 MW Periodic Permanent Magnet (PPM) klystrons arranged in groups of 8, followed by 2032 SLED-II rf pulse compression systems TESLA Concept: TESLA Concept The main linacs based on 1.3 GHz superconducting technology operating at 2 K. The cryoplant, is of a size comparable to that of the LHC, consisting of seven subsystems strung along the machines every 5 km. Which Technology to Chose?: Which Technology to Chose? Two alternate designs -- “warm” and “cold” had come to the stage where the show stoppers had been eliminated and the concepts were well understood. A major step toward a new international machine required uniting behind one technology, and then working toward a unified global design based on the recommended technology. Slide9: International Technology Review PanelEvaluate a Criteria Matrix: Evaluate a Criteria Matrix The panel analyzed the technology choice through studying a matrix having six general categories with specific items under each: the scope and parameters specified by the ILCSC; technical issues; cost issues; schedule issues; physics operation issues; and more general considerations that reflect the impact of the LC on science, technology and society The Recommendation: The Recommendation We recommend that the linear collider be based on superconducting rf technology This recommendation is made with the understanding that we are recommending a technology, not a design. We expect the final design to be developed by a team drawn from the combined warm and cold linear collider communities, taking full advantage of the experience and expertise of both (from the Executive Summary). The Technology Recommendation: The Technology Recommendation The recommendation was presented to ILCSC & ICFA on August 19 in a joint meeting in Beijing. ICFA unanimously endorsed the ITRP’s recommendation on August 20Slide13: The Community then Self-Organized Nov 13-15, 2004Slide14: The Global Design Effort Formal organization begun at LCWS 05 at Stanford in March 2005 when I became director of the GDE Technically Driven ScheduleGDE – Near Term Plan: GDE – Near Term Plan Schedule Begin to define Configuration (Aug 05) Baseline Configuration Document by end of 2005 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Put Baseline under Configuration Control (Jan 06) Develop Reference Design Report by end of 2006 Three volumes -- 1) Reference Design Report; 2) Shorter glossy version for non-experts and policy makers ; 3) Detector Concept ReportSlide16: Starting Point for the GDE Superconducting RF Main LinacParameters for the ILC: Parameters for the ILC Ecm adjustable from 200 – 500 GeV Luminosity ∫Ldt = 500 fb-1 in 4 years Ability to scan between 200 and 500 GeV Energy stability and precision below 0.1% Electron polarization of at least 80% The machine must be upgradeable to 1 TeV Experimental Test Facility - KEK: Experimental Test Facility - KEK Prototype Damping Ring for X-band Linear Collider Development of Beam Instrumentation and Control Towards the ILC Baseline Design: Towards the ILC Baseline DesignCost Breakdown by Subsystem: Cost Breakdown by Subsystem Civil SCRF LinacTESLA Cavity: TESLA Cavity 9-cell 1.3GHz Niobium Cavity Reference design: has not been modified in 10 years ~1mWhat Gradient to Choose?: What Gradient to Choose?Gradient: Gradient Results from KEK-DESY collaboration must reduce spread (need more statistics) single-cell measurements (in nine-cell cavities)Slide24: (Improve surface quality -- pioneering work done at KEK) BCP EP Several single cell cavities at g > 40 MV/m 4 nine-cell cavities at ~35 MV/m, one at 40 MV/m Theoretical Limit 50 MV/m Electro-polishingHow Costs Scale with Gradient?: How Costs Scale with Gradient? Relative Cost Gradient MV/m 35MV/m is close to optimum Japanese are still pushing for 40-45MV/m 30 MV/m would give safety margin C. Adolphsen (SLAC)Evolve the Cavities Minor Enhancement: Evolve the Cavities Minor Enhancement Low Loss Design Modification to cavity shape reduces peak B field. (A small Hp/Eacc ratio around 35Oe/(MV/m) must be designed). This generally means a smaller bore radius Trade-offs (Electropolishing, weak cell-to-cell coupling, etc) KEK currently producing prototypesNew Cavity Design: New Cavity Design More radical concepts potentially offer greater benefits. But require time and major new infrastructure to develop. 28 cell Super-structure Re-entrant single-cell achieved 45.7 MV/m Q0 ~1010 (Cornell)ILC Siting and Civil Construction: ILC Siting and Civil Construction The design is intimately tied to the features of the site 1 tunnels or 2 tunnels? Deep or shallow? Laser straight linac or follow earth’s curvature in segments? GDE ILC Design will be done to samples sites in the three regions ILC Civil Program: ILC Civil Program U.S., Japanese and European engineers are developing methods of analyzing the siting issues and comparing sites. The current effort is not intended to select a potential site, but rather to understand from the beginning how the features of sites will effect the design, performance and costParameters of Positron Sources: Parameters of Positron Sources Positron Source: Positron Source Large amount of charge to produce Three concepts: undulator-based (TESLA TDR baseline) ‘conventional’ laser Compton basedStrawman Final Focus: Strawman Final FocusTechnologies for the ILC: Technologies for the ILC Large Scale Project Characterization Large Project Management Precision Engineering International Coordination Industrialization Civil Construction & Infrastructure Cryogenics Superconducting RF structures, couplers, etc Electronics and Control Systems Large Scale Computing You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
Barish Industry 06 05 Jeremiah Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 100 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 09, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide1: The ILC Global Design Effort Barry Barish ILC Industrial Forum Japan 28-June-05Why e+e- Collisions?: Why e+e- Collisions? elementary particles well-defined energy, angular momentum uses full COM energy produces particles democratically can mostly fully reconstruct events Slide3: A Rich History as a Powerful ProbeSlide4: The Energy FrontierWhy a TeV Scale e+e- Accelerator?: Why a TeV Scale e+e- Accelerator? Two parallel developments over the past few years (the technology) Designs and technology demonstrations have matured on two technical approaches for an e+e- collider that are well matched to our present understanding of the physics. Slide6: GLC GLC/NLC Concept The main linacs operate at an unloaded gradient of 65 MV/m, beam-loaded to 50 MV/m. The rf systems for 500 GeV c.m. consist of 4064 75 MW Periodic Permanent Magnet (PPM) klystrons arranged in groups of 8, followed by 2032 SLED-II rf pulse compression systems TESLA Concept: TESLA Concept The main linacs based on 1.3 GHz superconducting technology operating at 2 K. The cryoplant, is of a size comparable to that of the LHC, consisting of seven subsystems strung along the machines every 5 km. Which Technology to Chose?: Which Technology to Chose? Two alternate designs -- “warm” and “cold” had come to the stage where the show stoppers had been eliminated and the concepts were well understood. A major step toward a new international machine required uniting behind one technology, and then working toward a unified global design based on the recommended technology. Slide9: International Technology Review PanelEvaluate a Criteria Matrix: Evaluate a Criteria Matrix The panel analyzed the technology choice through studying a matrix having six general categories with specific items under each: the scope and parameters specified by the ILCSC; technical issues; cost issues; schedule issues; physics operation issues; and more general considerations that reflect the impact of the LC on science, technology and society The Recommendation: The Recommendation We recommend that the linear collider be based on superconducting rf technology This recommendation is made with the understanding that we are recommending a technology, not a design. We expect the final design to be developed by a team drawn from the combined warm and cold linear collider communities, taking full advantage of the experience and expertise of both (from the Executive Summary). The Technology Recommendation: The Technology Recommendation The recommendation was presented to ILCSC & ICFA on August 19 in a joint meeting in Beijing. ICFA unanimously endorsed the ITRP’s recommendation on August 20Slide13: The Community then Self-Organized Nov 13-15, 2004Slide14: The Global Design Effort Formal organization begun at LCWS 05 at Stanford in March 2005 when I became director of the GDE Technically Driven ScheduleGDE – Near Term Plan: GDE – Near Term Plan Schedule Begin to define Configuration (Aug 05) Baseline Configuration Document by end of 2005 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Put Baseline under Configuration Control (Jan 06) Develop Reference Design Report by end of 2006 Three volumes -- 1) Reference Design Report; 2) Shorter glossy version for non-experts and policy makers ; 3) Detector Concept ReportSlide16: Starting Point for the GDE Superconducting RF Main LinacParameters for the ILC: Parameters for the ILC Ecm adjustable from 200 – 500 GeV Luminosity ∫Ldt = 500 fb-1 in 4 years Ability to scan between 200 and 500 GeV Energy stability and precision below 0.1% Electron polarization of at least 80% The machine must be upgradeable to 1 TeV Experimental Test Facility - KEK: Experimental Test Facility - KEK Prototype Damping Ring for X-band Linear Collider Development of Beam Instrumentation and Control Towards the ILC Baseline Design: Towards the ILC Baseline DesignCost Breakdown by Subsystem: Cost Breakdown by Subsystem Civil SCRF LinacTESLA Cavity: TESLA Cavity 9-cell 1.3GHz Niobium Cavity Reference design: has not been modified in 10 years ~1mWhat Gradient to Choose?: What Gradient to Choose?Gradient: Gradient Results from KEK-DESY collaboration must reduce spread (need more statistics) single-cell measurements (in nine-cell cavities)Slide24: (Improve surface quality -- pioneering work done at KEK) BCP EP Several single cell cavities at g > 40 MV/m 4 nine-cell cavities at ~35 MV/m, one at 40 MV/m Theoretical Limit 50 MV/m Electro-polishingHow Costs Scale with Gradient?: How Costs Scale with Gradient? Relative Cost Gradient MV/m 35MV/m is close to optimum Japanese are still pushing for 40-45MV/m 30 MV/m would give safety margin C. Adolphsen (SLAC)Evolve the Cavities Minor Enhancement: Evolve the Cavities Minor Enhancement Low Loss Design Modification to cavity shape reduces peak B field. (A small Hp/Eacc ratio around 35Oe/(MV/m) must be designed). This generally means a smaller bore radius Trade-offs (Electropolishing, weak cell-to-cell coupling, etc) KEK currently producing prototypesNew Cavity Design: New Cavity Design More radical concepts potentially offer greater benefits. But require time and major new infrastructure to develop. 28 cell Super-structure Re-entrant single-cell achieved 45.7 MV/m Q0 ~1010 (Cornell)ILC Siting and Civil Construction: ILC Siting and Civil Construction The design is intimately tied to the features of the site 1 tunnels or 2 tunnels? Deep or shallow? Laser straight linac or follow earth’s curvature in segments? GDE ILC Design will be done to samples sites in the three regions ILC Civil Program: ILC Civil Program U.S., Japanese and European engineers are developing methods of analyzing the siting issues and comparing sites. The current effort is not intended to select a potential site, but rather to understand from the beginning how the features of sites will effect the design, performance and costParameters of Positron Sources: Parameters of Positron Sources Positron Source: Positron Source Large amount of charge to produce Three concepts: undulator-based (TESLA TDR baseline) ‘conventional’ laser Compton basedStrawman Final Focus: Strawman Final FocusTechnologies for the ILC: Technologies for the ILC Large Scale Project Characterization Large Project Management Precision Engineering International Coordination Industrialization Civil Construction & Infrastructure Cryogenics Superconducting RF structures, couplers, etc Electronics and Control Systems Large Scale Computing