logging in or signing up HON101 groupwork higher ed 9 18 07 Janelle Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 100 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 30, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 1 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Group Work & Traits: Group Work & Traits HON101 September 18, 2007Group Work: Concepts and Factors: Group Work: Concepts and Factors Individual and Group Can be same or different Multiple Levels and layers Context is important Audience matters Tendencies People are usually . . .Peer Groups: Peer Groups Astin (1993) 192 variables and over 4,000 returned questionnaires “. . . the student’s peer group is the single most potent source of influence on growth and development during the undergraduate years.” (p. 398). Depends most on which peer groups the student most identifies with . . .Faculty: Faculty Astin, continued Second greatest impact variable Faculty Correlations (relationships) Research orientation and faculty salaries Research orientation and undergrads involved in faculty research Understanding Differences in Groups and Individuals - Student Development Theories in Higher Education: Understanding Differences in Groups and Individuals - Student Development Theories in Higher Education Chickering = Identity Josselson & Gilligan = Women Cross & Helms = Racial Identity Cass’s = GLBT Schlossberg’s = Transitions Perry & Kohlberg = Ethical and Moral Holland’s = Vocational Astin and “Plus One”Re-framing Higher Education Organizations: Re-framing Higher Education Organizations Bolman and Deal 4 frames of working in organizations Structural (the factory) Human resource (the family) Political (the jungle) Symbolic (the temple)Integrating Frames for Effective Practice – as a Leader: Integrating Frames for Effective Practice – as a Leader Know the people in the group Frame of reference Individual Group Anticipate multiple realities Selecting frames to use “More art than science.” (p. 429)Personality Types and Groups: Personality Types and Groups Jung and MBTI I and E S and N T and F J and P http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/JTypes2.asp References: References Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Bolman, L. G. & Deal, T. E. (2003). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (3rd. ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Evans, N. J., Forney, D. S., & Guido-DiBrito, F. (1998). Student development in college: Theory, research, and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
HON101 groupwork higher ed 9 18 07 Janelle Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 100 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 30, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 1 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Group Work & Traits: Group Work & Traits HON101 September 18, 2007Group Work: Concepts and Factors: Group Work: Concepts and Factors Individual and Group Can be same or different Multiple Levels and layers Context is important Audience matters Tendencies People are usually . . .Peer Groups: Peer Groups Astin (1993) 192 variables and over 4,000 returned questionnaires “. . . the student’s peer group is the single most potent source of influence on growth and development during the undergraduate years.” (p. 398). Depends most on which peer groups the student most identifies with . . .Faculty: Faculty Astin, continued Second greatest impact variable Faculty Correlations (relationships) Research orientation and faculty salaries Research orientation and undergrads involved in faculty research Understanding Differences in Groups and Individuals - Student Development Theories in Higher Education: Understanding Differences in Groups and Individuals - Student Development Theories in Higher Education Chickering = Identity Josselson & Gilligan = Women Cross & Helms = Racial Identity Cass’s = GLBT Schlossberg’s = Transitions Perry & Kohlberg = Ethical and Moral Holland’s = Vocational Astin and “Plus One”Re-framing Higher Education Organizations: Re-framing Higher Education Organizations Bolman and Deal 4 frames of working in organizations Structural (the factory) Human resource (the family) Political (the jungle) Symbolic (the temple)Integrating Frames for Effective Practice – as a Leader: Integrating Frames for Effective Practice – as a Leader Know the people in the group Frame of reference Individual Group Anticipate multiple realities Selecting frames to use “More art than science.” (p. 429)Personality Types and Groups: Personality Types and Groups Jung and MBTI I and E S and N T and F J and P http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/JTypes2.asp References: References Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Bolman, L. G. & Deal, T. E. (2003). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (3rd. ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Evans, N. J., Forney, D. S., & Guido-DiBrito, F. (1998). Student development in college: Theory, research, and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.