Water Harvesting in Eastern Coastal Plains (Orissa, AP, TN): Water Harvesting in Eastern Coastal Plains (Orissa, AP, TN) Sangati CPR Working group
Area of focus: Area of focus Between Eastern ghats and Bay of Bengal
Rainfall range: 1000-3000mm
Subdivisions:
Mahanadi delta
Southern AP plains
Krishna and Godavari deltas
Kanyakumari coast
Sandy littorals
Madras/Coromandel coast
Role of Water Harvesting: Role of Water Harvesting Study by an organization known as PROGRESS
Area of focus: drainage basin of a few tributaries of Krishna river
Elevation difference between mouth of basin and topmost point: 290m
Heavy runoff
Main rainfall: July and August
Rainfall in 1988-90: ~900mm per year
Yet soil was moisture-deficient (drought conditions)
Role of Water Harvesting: Role of Water Harvesting Study over two years with:
Water-absorbing cropping techniques
Intercropping, organic farming, etc.
Water harvesting
Runoff conserved through interconnected water structures, so that overflow in one gets collected in another
170 structures, covering 4% of the basin area
Harvested 25% of total rainfall
Conclusions of study:
Drought is not because of lack of rainfall but because of mismanagement of existing rainfall
Traditional water structures if revitalized can harvest 75% of the runoff
Worst-affected by lack of over-reliance on individual wells (as opposed to tanks) are the small farmers. Leads to the usual cycle of indebtedness
Orissa, AP: Orissa, AP Area: Mahanadi delta, Palar basin
Tanks, percolations tanks, etc.
Tamil Nadu: Tamil Nadu Drought-prone state
Artificial irrigation imperative
Classic example: Tanjore
“For the most part, the soil is naturally poor, and it is irrigation alone which makes the province such a scene of fertility” (British irrigation authority)
Annual Rainfall: 750-1000mm – NE monsoon, 250mm – SW monsoon
Anicuts: Anicuts Small to medium size dams
Length: 329m, width: 12-18m, depth: 4.5m
Mainly around the Cauvery delta to channel water
Silting/scouring of the riverbed was a problem (not carefully engineered to prevent this)
Prevented by controlling the water flow into the Cauvery delta, by constructing centralized “regulators” or kallanais at the head of the Cauvery delta in Srirangam
Serpentine structure for kallanai to resist floods better
Eris: Eris Ancient tanks
Approximately one-third of the irrigated area of Tamil Nadu is watered by eris (tanks).
Eris have played several important roles in maintaining ecological harmony as flood-control systems, preventing soil erosion and wastage of runoff during periods of heavy rainfall, and recharging the groundwater in the surrounding areas.
The presence of eris provided an appropriate micro-climate for the local areas. Without eris, paddy cultivation would have been impossible.
History of Eris: History of Eris Till the British arrived, local communities maintained eris.
Historical data from Chengalpattu district indicates that in the 18th century about 4-5 per cent of the gross produce of each village was allocated to maintain eris and other irrigation structures.
The early British rule saw the enormous expropriation of village resources by the state
Eris managed by centralized Public Works Department
Led to the poor maintenance and degeneration of eris
Oorani: Oorani Smaller tanks (compared to eris) containing just enough water to cultivate the few acres of land dependent on them.
Major source of water for drinking and domestic use where groundwater not sufficient
Generally excavated to depths ranging from 2-5 m below ground.
In many cases, rehabilitation of neglected village tanks saves approximately 365 hours or 45 working days per household
Which is the total time spent each year to fetch water from neighboring villages.
Especially applicable where groundwater is saline
Kudimaramath: Kudimaramath Voluntary labor undertaken by village communities traditionally to maintain the eris / ooranis
Checking the growth of weeds on tank bunds
Clearing away underwood from tank bunds
Clearing out deposits/silt
Blocking breaches through ring bunds
Came to an end when the British forced eris under PWD
Eri maintenance was contracted out, leading to the usual cycle of negligence, corruption, etc.
Decline of tank irrigation in TN: Decline of tank irrigation in TN Old records: 39000 tanks in TN!
Sharp decline, esp. in North Arcot, South Arcot and Chengalpattu
Traditional Irrigation Institutions (TIIs) that perform maintenance have reduced in effectiveness
Centralization of tank maintenance
Emergence of wells and electricity, also leading to cuts in payments of maintenance workers
Transfer of land / redistribution of land means more owners of land, more castes own land
Caste-based factions of TIIs, more people means less effectiveness
Many tanks in TN are fed by an anicut system; Palar anicut system supplies water to 317 tanks in N. Arcot and Chengalpattu
Here, the tanks close to the head have more effective TIIs, tail-reach tanks are less effective
Chennai: Chennai Annual rainfall: 1200mm, which is sufficient
Lack of facilities to store this water
Current capacity: 100 million cu. M, or ~2700 million cu. Ft. or ~76,356 million liters
124 tanks, plus 39 temple tanks (or kulams) (?)
5.5% of Madras Metropolitan area
Include tanks in Cholavaram and Red Hills which are used only for domestic needs (~28000 million liters)
Rough demand: ~283 million liters a day, or ~100,000 million liters a year
Clearly, the current capacity to store rain water needs to be fully utilized!
RWH crucial!
Chennai: Chennai However, traditional temple tanks (and other tanks too) have degenerated
Storm-water courses that refill these tanks have disappeared
Water runs off into the sea
Slum resettlements on tank and lake beds
“When World Bank gave TNHB Rs. 600 crore as aid for slum improvement schemes, we had no land to implement them on. Hence, we had to think of tank beds” (deputy planner, MMDA)
As a result, ground-water depletion heavy
Salt water front of the sea has advanced by 800m in 20 years (10-year old data, probably even worse now)