Beyond the Evolution vs. Creation Debate

Views:
 
     
 

Presentation Description

Denis O. Lamoureux - http://www.ualberta.ca/~dlamoure/ - is an assistant professor of science and religion at St. Joseph's College in the University of Alberta. His appointment is the first tenure-track position in Canada dedicated to teaching and research on the relationship between scientific discovery and Christian faith.

Comments

Presentation Transcript

Beyondthe“Evolution” vs. “Creation”Debate : 

Beyondthe“Evolution” vs. “Creation”Debate Denis O. Lamoureux Associate Professor of Science & Religion St. Joseph’s College, University of Alberta

Slide 2: 

Thomas Henry Huxley 1859

Slide 3: 

T.H. Huxley Extinguished theologians lie about the cradle of every science as the strangled snakes of Hercules . . .

Slide 4: 

And history records that whenever science and orthodoxy have been fairly opposed, the latter has been forced to retire from the lists, bleeding and crushed if not annihilated; scotched, if not slain. T.H. Huxley

Slide 5: 

TheProblem

Slide 6: 

DICHOTOMY “Science” “Religion”

Julian Huxley : 

Julian Huxley The earth was not created, it evolved. So did all the animals and plants that inhabit it, including our human selves, mind and soul as well as brain and body. So did religion.

Slide 8: 

Julian Huxley Evolutionary truth frees us from subservient fear of the unknown and supernatural, and exhorts us to face this new freedom. It shows us our destiny and our duty. The truth will set us free.

Slide 9: 

Evolutionary man can no longer take refuge from his loneliness in the arms of a divinized father figure whom he has himself created, nor escape from the responsibility of making decisions by sheltering under the umbrella of Divine Authority. Julian Huxley

Slide 10: 

Finally, the evolutionary vision is enabling us to discern, however incompletely, the outline of the new religion that we can be sure will arise to serve the needs of the coming era. Julian Huxley

DICHOTOMY : 

DICHOTOMY “Science” “Evolution” No God Humanist Ethics Scientism Science & Secular WV CONFLATION “Religion”

Slide 12: 

Henry Morris There are only two basic world views: The God-centred world view and the man-centred world view, creation or evolution.

Slide 13: 

There is no proven scientific evidence that the earth is old. There is no evidence whatever that evolution of one kind of organism into a more complex organism has ever occurred. Henry Morris

Slide 14: 

Divine revelation from the Creator of the world states that He did it all in six days several thousand years ago. The Bible contains all the basic principles upon which TRUE science is built. The Bible is a book of science! Henry Morris

Slide 15: 

There is a personal Creator behind the origin of all things and we urgently need to know Him and to order our lives according to His will as revealed in the Bible. Satan himself is the originator of the concept of evolution. Henry Morris

DICHOTOMY : 

DICHOTOMY “Science” “Evolution” No God Humanist Ethics Scientism Science & Secular WV CONFLATION “Religion” “Creation” God Biblical Ethics Fundamentalism Christianity & 6 Days CONFLATION

DICHOTOMY : 

DICHOTOMY “Science” “Evolution” No God Humanist Ethics Scientism Science & Secular WV CONFLATION “Religion” “Creation” God Biblical Ethics Fundamentalism Christianity & 6 Days CONFLATION ?

Slide 18: 

Moving BeyondtheDichotomy

Slide 19: 

Scientists Are Still Keeping the Faith Ed Larson & Larry Witham Nature 3 Apr 97

Slide 20: 

I believe in a God in intellectual and emotional communication with humankind, i.e. a God to whom one may pray in expectation of receiving an answer. By “answer” I mean more than the subjective psychological effect of prayer.  I believe in continuation of the person after death into another world.  40%

Slide 21: 

Science and God: A Warming Trend? Gregg Easterbrook Science 15 Aug 97

Slide 22: 

The National Academy of Sciences and the American Association for the Advancement of Science have launched projects to promote a dialogue between science and religion. Gregg Easterbrook

Slide 23: 

New institutions aimed at bridging the gap have been formed, including the Chicago Center for Religion and Science, and the Center for Theology and Natural Sciences in Berkeley, California. Universities such as Cambridge and Princeton also have established professorships or lectureships on the reconciliation of the two camps. Gregg Easterbrook

Slide 24: 

Pope John Paul II New knowledge leads to the recognition of the theory of evolution as more than a hypothesis.

Slide 25: 

The Bible speaks of the origin of the universe NOT to provide a scientific treatise, but to state the correct relationships of humanity with God and with the universe. Pope John Paul II

Slide 26: 

Sacred Scripture simply declares that the world was created by God, and it expresses this truth in the terms of the cosmology [science] in use at the time of the writer. Pope John Paul II

Slide 27: 

The Bible is a book of Redemption, and of course I accept Billy Graham the Creation story. I believe that God did create the universe. The Bible is NOT a book of science.

Slide 28: 

Billy Graham Whether it came by an evolutionary process and at a certain point He took this person or being and made him a living soul or not, does not change the fact that God did create humanity. I believe God created humanity.

Slide 29: 

Whichever way God did it makes no difference as to what men and women are & their relationship to God. Billy Graham

Slide 30: 

DICHOTOMY “Science” “Religion” Science 40% Believe in a Personal God Science-Religion Dialogue Religion Pope John Paul II Accepts Evolution Billy Graham Open to Evolution X X X

Slide 31: 

TowardaSolution

Slide 32: 

Teleology Dysteleology Creation Evolution ? ist ist

Slide 34: 

Belief that beauty, complexity & functionality in nature point to an Intelligent Designer/s Intelligent Design STANDARD CELL 1/1000 inch 1 yard of DNA Information = 30 vols ID a DeIusion Dysteleology ID Real Teleology

Slide 35: 

Instructional Tool

Slide 36: 

Christian Bias Mix & Match

Slide 37: 

Young Earth Creation “Creationist” Position Creation Science

Slide 38: 

Teleology Intelligent Design Age of the Universe Biological Evolution Yes Yes 6000 yrs Rejects Macro- evolution Accepts Micro- evolution Young Earth Creation

Slide 39: 

God’s Activity in the Origin of Universe & Life God’s Activity in the Lives of Men & Women YES Direct Interventions over 6 days YES Personal God Dramatic & Subtle Young Earth Creation

Slide 40: 

Nature of Bible Interpretation of Genesis 1-11 Origin of Humanity Word of God Inspired by Holy Spirit Strict Literalism Creation Days = 24 hrs Global flood Adam & Eve Accepts Image of God Accepts sin Young Earth Creation

Slide 41: 

Theology or Philosophy Ethics Examples Conservative Christianity Accepts Incarnation & Resurrection Biblical Young Earth Creation Institute for Creation Research Henry Morris, Duane Gish Answers in Genesis Ken Ham

Slide 42: 

Progressive Creation Old Earth Creation Day-Age Theory

Slide 43: 

Teleology Intelligent Design Age of the Universe Biological Evolution Yes Yes 10-15 billion yrs Rejects Macro- evolution Accepts Micro- evolution Progressive Creation

Slide 44: 

God’s Activity in the Origin of Universe & Life God’s Activity in the Lives of Men & Women YES 1. Direct for basic “kinds” of life interventions over billion yrs 2. Indirect for inanimate universe Ordained & Sustained Natural Processes YES Personal God Dramatic & Subtle Progressive Creation

Slide 45: 

Nature of Bible Interpretation of Genesis 1-11 Origin of Humanity Word of God Inspired by Holy Spirit General Literalism Days = Geologic Ages Local flood Adam & Eve Accepts Image of God Accepts sin Progressive Creation

Slide 47: 

Nature of Bible Interpretation of Genesis 1-11 Origin of Humanity Word of God Inspired by Holy Spirit General Literalism Days = Geologic Ages Local flood Adam & Eve Accepts Image of God Accepts sin Progressive Creation

Slide 48: 

Theology or Philosophy Ethics Examples Conservative Christianity Accepts Incarnation & Resurrection Biblical Reasons To Believe Hugh Ross [ Intelligent Design Theory Johnson, Behe, et al ] Progressive Creation

Slide 49: 

Evolutionary Creation Theistic Evolution

Slide 50: 

Teleology Intelligent Design Age of the Universe Biological Evolution Yes Yes 10-15 billion yrs Accepts Macro- evolution Accepts Micro- evolution Evolutionary Creation

Slide 51: 

God’s Activity in the Origin of Universe & Life God’s Activity in the Lives of Men & Women YES Indirect Ordained & Sustained Natural Processes YES Personal God Dramatic & Subtle Evolutionary Creation

Slide 52: 

Embryology- Evolution Analogy

Slide 53: 

God’s Activity in the Origin of Universe & Life God’s Activity in the Lives of Men & Women YES Indirect Ordained & Sustained Natural Processes YES Personal God Dramatic & Subtle Evolutionary Creation

Slide 54: 

Nature of Bible Interpretation of Genesis 1-11 Origin of Humanity Word of God Inspired by Holy Spirit 1. Divine Theology 2. Ancient Science 3. Ancient Poetry Humanity evolved Accepts Image of God Accepts sin Evolutionary Creation

Slide 55: 

1. Divine Theology  God created the world.  The world is very good.  Humans bear God’s Image.  Humans fallen into sin.  God judges humans for sin.

Slide 56: 

2. Ancient Science 3-Tier Universe

Slide 57: 

Ancient Science

Slide 58: 

Ancient Science Babylonian World Map 6th Century BC/E

Slide 59: 

Ancient Science  Ur Is 41:8

Slide 60: 

Ancient Science  Sheba Matt 12:42 Jesus

Slide 61: 

3. Ancient Poetry Flood Account Chiasm Gen 6-9 History?

Slide 62: 

Creation Account Panels Gen 1 Ancient Poetry Science?

Slide 63: 

Nature of Bible Interpretation of Genesis 1-11 Origin of Humanity Word of God Inspired by Holy Spirit 1. Divine Theology 2. Ancient Science 3. Ancient Poetry Humanity evolved Accepts Image of God Accepts sin Evolutionary Creation

Slide 64: 

Theology or Philosophy Ethics Examples Conservative Christianity Accepts Incarnation & Resurrection Biblical Roman Catholicism Evolutionary Creation Some Evangelical Protestants Francis Collins

Slide 65: 

Deistic Evolution God-of-the-Philosophers“Theistic” Evolution

Slide 66: 

Teleology Intelligent Design Age of the Universe Biological Evolution Yes Yes 10-15 billion yrs Accepts Macro- evolution & Micro- evolution Deistic Evolution

Slide 67: 

God’s Activity in the Origin of Universe & Life God’s Activity in the Lives of Men & Women YES Indirect Ordained Natural Processes NO Impersonal God God never enters the world Deistic Evolution

Slide 68: 

Nature of Bible Interpretation of Genesis 1-11 Origin of Humanity Human beliefs about God Rejects Divine revelation God never enters world Irrelevant origins myth Humanity evolved Rejects Image of God Rejects sin Deistic Evolution

Slide 69: 

Theology or Philosophy Ethics Examples Deism Liberal Christianity Rejects Incarnation & Resurrection Humanism Charles Darwin Michael Denton Anthony Flew Deistic Evolution

Slide 70: 

Dysteleological Evolution “Evolutionist” PositionAtheistic Evolution

Slide 71: 

Teleology Intelligent Design Age of the Universe Biological Evolution No Plan & purpose a delusion No Design a delusion 10-15 billion yrs Accepts Macro- evolution & Micro- evolution Dysteleological Evolution

Slide 72: 

God’s Activity in the Origin of Universe & Life God’s Activity in the Lives of Men & Women No Blind Chance Natural Processes God an delusion No No God God an delusion Dysteleological Evolution

Slide 73: 

Nature of Bible Interpretation of Genesis 1-11 Origin of Humanity Human superstitions Rejects Divine revelation God a delusion Irrelevant origins myth Humanity evolved Rejects Image of God Rejects sin Dysteleological Evolution

Slide 74: 

Theology or Philosophy Ethics Examples Atheism Rejects Incarnation & Resurrection Humanism Richard Dawkins Daniel Dennett Christopher Hitchens Sam Harris Dysteleological Evolution

Slide 75: 

5%

Slide 76: 

5%

Slide 77: 

Conclusions

Slide 78: 

 Define Terms & Concepts  Recognize the Faith Jump  Move Beyond the “Evolution” vs. “Creation” Debate FALSE DICHOTOMY Consider Two Books Model:

Slide 79: 

Let no woman or man, out of conceit or laziness, think or believe that anyone can search too far or be too well informed in the Book of God’s Works or the Book of God’s Words: Sir Francis Bacon Science or Religion. Instead, let everyone endlessly improve their understanding of both.