logging in or signing up Goff Irvette Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 118 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: December 06, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Using WebCT for Assessment, Dialogue and Feedback : Using WebCT for Assessment, Dialogue and Feedback Presented by: Lori Goff and Beryl Piccinin Biology DepartmentWhat is WebCT?: What is WebCT? Course management system Virtual course environment Course preparation, delivery, and management Using WebCT in Biology: Using WebCT in Biology Biology 1A03 and 1AA3 First year biology courses with enrollment of 1200-1600 students 70-80 lab sections 60+ TAs Diverse backgroundsUsing WebCT in Biology: Using WebCT in Biology Biology 3Q03 and 3QQ3 Peer mentoring courses, many small group projects, discussions, and problem solving 15-20 students Problems to solve! : Problems to solve! First year students were arriving to labs, unprepared! Difficult job for the TAs Time issues Poor resultsProblems to solve! : Problems to solve! Poor performance on course tests Students were not using resources available to them Poor time management skills Relying on high school strategiesProblems to solve! : Problems to solve! Gathering student feedback about course, instructors, and TAs Poor response rate: Many students don’t attend the last few classes Tabulation: Time consumingProblems to solve! : Problems to solve! Not enough class or lab time for discussion Student complaints about needing more interaction and discussion time with their peers Student complaints about not being able to attend TA office hoursProblem #1 : Problem #1 First year students were arriving to labs, unprepared! Possible Solution? Skill Quizzes and Pre-Lab Quizzes evaluated onlineWebCT Quiz Tool: WebCT Quiz Tool Question bank (many types of questions) Tests created with random questions Timer Multiple attempts Selective release (when, who) Black out periods Conditions Instantaneous results Problem #1: Students unprepared for labsSlide12: Problem #1: Students unprepared for labsSlide13: Problem #1: Students unprepared for labsSlide14: Problem #1: Students unprepared for labsSlide15: Student submissions and grades Question statistics Problem #1: Students unprepared for labsOur WebCT Quiz Solution: Our WebCT Quiz Solution Give students three attempts at each quiz Instant feedback on performance Allows students to see self-improvements Include 30 minute black-out period between attempts Encourages review of material Helps develop time-management skills Problem #1: Students unprepared for labsOur WebCT Quiz Solution: Our WebCT Quiz Solution Make deadline at midnight on the day before the lab Encourages time-management Set “mastery” at 80% accuracy and include challenging questions Communicates high expectations Indicates how much understanding is required Record student participation Valuable analysis tool Problem #1: Students unprepared for labsReflection: Reflection Since inclusion of WebCT pre-lab quizzes in the course… Students arrive to lab prepared! They have read the lab manual and are familiar with the procedures and calculations! They are now able to finish the lab in the allotted time! Problem #1: Students unprepared for labsReflection: Reflection Since inclusion of WebCT pre-lab quizzes in the course… Lab results have improved tremendously! TAs can spend time on value-added activity! Students are more prepared than the TAs! Next step: WebCT quiz requirement for TAs? Problem #1: Students unprepared for labsProblem #2 : Problem #2 Performance on first year tests was poor! Students were not spending enough time preparing for tests! Possible Solution? Offer pre-test quizzes in advance of each test?Thought process : Thought process Since the pre-lab quizzes were working to encourage students to prepare for labs, WebCT quizzes should also work well to prepare students for tests Problem #2: Students unprepared for testsThought process : Thought process Test 1: Posted sample questions (static, passive) were not being accessed or utilized effectively Test 2: Experiment with interactive online WebCT quiz? Problem #2: Students unprepared for testsWebCT Pre-Test Quizzes : WebCT Pre-Test Quizzes Bank of MC and SA questions Random tests generated Three attempts Time limit per attempt 30 minute black-out period 80% mastery required for bonus mark! Deadline: two days before the test Problem #2: Students unprepared for testsSlide24: Test 2 Average = 68.7% Problem #2: Students unprepared for testsReflection: Reflection It’s only a correlation at this point, but… It appears that the pre-test quizzes are successful in helping the students to prepare for the term tests! Next step: Plan to include regular online quizzes throughout the semester as a component in the course to help encourage students to stay current with the lecture material Problem #2: Students unprepared for testsProblem #3 : Problem #3 Gathering student feedback about course, instructors, and TAs was time-consuming and resulted in poor response rates Possible Solution? Online course evaluations and surveys?Thought process : Thought process Provide students with the opportunity to evaluate the course, the instructors, and the TAs using online quizzes Must be anonymous: Survey tool! Problem #3: Gathering feedback was problematic Results and Reflections : Results and Reflections Survey tool = Quiz tool, but anonymous Response rate = 75-90% Tabulation = electronic, automatic! Can ask course specific questions to solicit useful feedback Problem #3: Gathering feedback was problematic Problem #4 : Problem #4 Not enough class or lab time for discussion Possible Solution? Electronic discussion forum or conference?Thought process : Thought process WebCT offers online chat, mail, and discussion forum tools Students can contact TAs outside of class, synchronously or asynchronously Include participation component that requires students to participate in online discussions Problem #4: No time in class or lab time for discussion Results and Reflections : Results and Reflections Biology 3Q03/3QQ3: Online discussion topic posted every other week Each student must reply to topic question Each student must then reply to two peers responses Promotes exchange of ideas Can monitor involvement Problem #4: No time in class or lab time for discussionResults and Reflections : Results and Reflections Biology 1A03/1AA3: Students post group progress reports and drafts for group members and TA Online meeting space (chat, mail, forum) Promotes exchange of ideas, peer evaluation Can monitor participation Problem #4: No time in class or lab time for discussionSummary: Summary Pros and Cons Final thoughtsPros: Pros Gives prompt feedback Instant quiz results My Grades for test results Communicates high expectations 80% for mastery Examples of required detailPros: Pros Emphasizes time on task Forced black-out periods, multiple attempts, deadlines Develops reciprocity and co-operation WebCT discussions, team approach Exchange of ideas Respects diversity amongst students Cons: Cons Learning curve for new technology Start-up is time consuming Problems with technology Never certain of who is participating Cons – minimized: Cons – minimized Learning curve for new technology Students seem to be able to adapt pretty quickly, WebCT is user-friendly Start-up is time consuming Yes. Start slow and build. Trouble-shoot errors along the way. Cons - minimized: Cons - minimized Problems with technology We offer students multiple attempts at each quiz worth grades in case of technological failure Never certain of who is participating and under what conditions Cannot replace traditional invigilated tests entirely. Final Thoughts: Final Thoughts Few drawbacks to using WebCT for grading purposes Many advantages to help solve the problems we were experiencing and promote learning for our students You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
Goff Irvette Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 118 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: December 06, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Using WebCT for Assessment, Dialogue and Feedback : Using WebCT for Assessment, Dialogue and Feedback Presented by: Lori Goff and Beryl Piccinin Biology DepartmentWhat is WebCT?: What is WebCT? Course management system Virtual course environment Course preparation, delivery, and management Using WebCT in Biology: Using WebCT in Biology Biology 1A03 and 1AA3 First year biology courses with enrollment of 1200-1600 students 70-80 lab sections 60+ TAs Diverse backgroundsUsing WebCT in Biology: Using WebCT in Biology Biology 3Q03 and 3QQ3 Peer mentoring courses, many small group projects, discussions, and problem solving 15-20 students Problems to solve! : Problems to solve! First year students were arriving to labs, unprepared! Difficult job for the TAs Time issues Poor resultsProblems to solve! : Problems to solve! Poor performance on course tests Students were not using resources available to them Poor time management skills Relying on high school strategiesProblems to solve! : Problems to solve! Gathering student feedback about course, instructors, and TAs Poor response rate: Many students don’t attend the last few classes Tabulation: Time consumingProblems to solve! : Problems to solve! Not enough class or lab time for discussion Student complaints about needing more interaction and discussion time with their peers Student complaints about not being able to attend TA office hoursProblem #1 : Problem #1 First year students were arriving to labs, unprepared! Possible Solution? Skill Quizzes and Pre-Lab Quizzes evaluated onlineWebCT Quiz Tool: WebCT Quiz Tool Question bank (many types of questions) Tests created with random questions Timer Multiple attempts Selective release (when, who) Black out periods Conditions Instantaneous results Problem #1: Students unprepared for labsSlide12: Problem #1: Students unprepared for labsSlide13: Problem #1: Students unprepared for labsSlide14: Problem #1: Students unprepared for labsSlide15: Student submissions and grades Question statistics Problem #1: Students unprepared for labsOur WebCT Quiz Solution: Our WebCT Quiz Solution Give students three attempts at each quiz Instant feedback on performance Allows students to see self-improvements Include 30 minute black-out period between attempts Encourages review of material Helps develop time-management skills Problem #1: Students unprepared for labsOur WebCT Quiz Solution: Our WebCT Quiz Solution Make deadline at midnight on the day before the lab Encourages time-management Set “mastery” at 80% accuracy and include challenging questions Communicates high expectations Indicates how much understanding is required Record student participation Valuable analysis tool Problem #1: Students unprepared for labsReflection: Reflection Since inclusion of WebCT pre-lab quizzes in the course… Students arrive to lab prepared! They have read the lab manual and are familiar with the procedures and calculations! They are now able to finish the lab in the allotted time! Problem #1: Students unprepared for labsReflection: Reflection Since inclusion of WebCT pre-lab quizzes in the course… Lab results have improved tremendously! TAs can spend time on value-added activity! Students are more prepared than the TAs! Next step: WebCT quiz requirement for TAs? Problem #1: Students unprepared for labsProblem #2 : Problem #2 Performance on first year tests was poor! Students were not spending enough time preparing for tests! Possible Solution? Offer pre-test quizzes in advance of each test?Thought process : Thought process Since the pre-lab quizzes were working to encourage students to prepare for labs, WebCT quizzes should also work well to prepare students for tests Problem #2: Students unprepared for testsThought process : Thought process Test 1: Posted sample questions (static, passive) were not being accessed or utilized effectively Test 2: Experiment with interactive online WebCT quiz? Problem #2: Students unprepared for testsWebCT Pre-Test Quizzes : WebCT Pre-Test Quizzes Bank of MC and SA questions Random tests generated Three attempts Time limit per attempt 30 minute black-out period 80% mastery required for bonus mark! Deadline: two days before the test Problem #2: Students unprepared for testsSlide24: Test 2 Average = 68.7% Problem #2: Students unprepared for testsReflection: Reflection It’s only a correlation at this point, but… It appears that the pre-test quizzes are successful in helping the students to prepare for the term tests! Next step: Plan to include regular online quizzes throughout the semester as a component in the course to help encourage students to stay current with the lecture material Problem #2: Students unprepared for testsProblem #3 : Problem #3 Gathering student feedback about course, instructors, and TAs was time-consuming and resulted in poor response rates Possible Solution? Online course evaluations and surveys?Thought process : Thought process Provide students with the opportunity to evaluate the course, the instructors, and the TAs using online quizzes Must be anonymous: Survey tool! Problem #3: Gathering feedback was problematic Results and Reflections : Results and Reflections Survey tool = Quiz tool, but anonymous Response rate = 75-90% Tabulation = electronic, automatic! Can ask course specific questions to solicit useful feedback Problem #3: Gathering feedback was problematic Problem #4 : Problem #4 Not enough class or lab time for discussion Possible Solution? Electronic discussion forum or conference?Thought process : Thought process WebCT offers online chat, mail, and discussion forum tools Students can contact TAs outside of class, synchronously or asynchronously Include participation component that requires students to participate in online discussions Problem #4: No time in class or lab time for discussion Results and Reflections : Results and Reflections Biology 3Q03/3QQ3: Online discussion topic posted every other week Each student must reply to topic question Each student must then reply to two peers responses Promotes exchange of ideas Can monitor involvement Problem #4: No time in class or lab time for discussionResults and Reflections : Results and Reflections Biology 1A03/1AA3: Students post group progress reports and drafts for group members and TA Online meeting space (chat, mail, forum) Promotes exchange of ideas, peer evaluation Can monitor participation Problem #4: No time in class or lab time for discussionSummary: Summary Pros and Cons Final thoughtsPros: Pros Gives prompt feedback Instant quiz results My Grades for test results Communicates high expectations 80% for mastery Examples of required detailPros: Pros Emphasizes time on task Forced black-out periods, multiple attempts, deadlines Develops reciprocity and co-operation WebCT discussions, team approach Exchange of ideas Respects diversity amongst students Cons: Cons Learning curve for new technology Start-up is time consuming Problems with technology Never certain of who is participating Cons – minimized: Cons – minimized Learning curve for new technology Students seem to be able to adapt pretty quickly, WebCT is user-friendly Start-up is time consuming Yes. Start slow and build. Trouble-shoot errors along the way. Cons - minimized: Cons - minimized Problems with technology We offer students multiple attempts at each quiz worth grades in case of technological failure Never certain of who is participating and under what conditions Cannot replace traditional invigilated tests entirely. Final Thoughts: Final Thoughts Few drawbacks to using WebCT for grading purposes Many advantages to help solve the problems we were experiencing and promote learning for our students