logging in or signing up 10 45 alcino heraklion Hufflepuff Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 216 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: June 24, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript TERESA OLIVEIRAALCINO PASCOALLOURENÇO FRAZÃOFCT-UNL | PORTUGAL: VELVITT Conference 'Portuguese Experience with VLEs' TERESA OLIVEIRA ALCINO PASCOAL LOURENÇO FRAZÃO FCT-UNL | PORTUGAL TEI of Crete | Heraklion – GREECE | October 11th, 2005 FCT-UNL IN A NUTSHELL: FCT-UNL IN A NUTSHELL Established in 1977, as part of UNL (New University of Lisbon); Approximately 6.500 undergraduate students; Offers 19 degrees in Sciences and Engineering; Offers 3 Science Teaching degrees, although 2 are suspended for the time being; Only Maths Teaching degree is fully operational. VLEs’ USAGE @ FCT-UNL: VLEs’ USAGE @ FCT-UNL No VLE adopted until 2004; Initial trials comprised the use of a proprietary platform (FCT-UNL’s Training Institute) and in-house web-based portals with reduced features; Academic year 2004-2005 marked the adoption of Moodle by FCT-UNL; Not all courses are implemented in Moodle, but the activities are expanding significantly. IN-HOUSE WB PORTALS - 1: IN-HOUSE WB PORTALS - 1 Pioneering activity of the Educational Sciences Sector; First experiments dated 1997-98; In constant use from 1998-99 up to 2003-04; Main objectives: Information repository (FAQs, courses’ syllabi); Download area (shareware software); Students’ portfolios; Administration area (calendar, summaries, etc.); Evaluation area (detailed review and final marks). IN-HOUSE WB PORTALS - 2: IN-HOUSE WB PORTALS - 2 Main features / implementations / characteristics: Companion ftp server with restricted access; Specific mailing list (Yahoo groups); Comprehensive list of educational software and other resources; Regular updates (FAQs, calendar, administration area, etc.); Support of external peers, whenever available (other tutors, software developers, etc.); Html editing compulsory for assignments; Reviewed profile: the word to the individual; Flexible templates available. IN-HOUSE WB PORTALS - 3: IN-HOUSE WB PORTALS - 3 The pluses: Intense collaborative work (within the groups and the class); Development of social skills (communication…); Exploitation of creativity with the assignments’ delivery; Development of technical skills while manipulating different types of software; Improved use of the www as a privileged source of information; Enhanced thinking and reasoning; Low level of drop-off rates; Implementation of proto-learning communities. IN-HOUSE WB PORTALS - 4: IN-HOUSE WB PORTALS - 4 The minuses: Requires huge administration work from the tutor; Students’ registration is not automated; Mailing list inefficient for sustaining a discussion; Too much flexibility with templates can be a burden for the tutor; Html editing and ftping might be complex for some students; Calendar features proved to be insufficient; Temptation to concentrate on aesthetics rather than contents; Some simple tasks are not automated: it requires extra time from students enrolled. IMPLEMENTING Moodle - 1: IMPLEMENTING Moodle - 1 Pioneering activity of the Educational Sciences Sector; First experiments dated 2003-04; In constant use from 2004-05; Main objectives: Information exchange (FAQs, working documents, courses’ syllabi); Interactive communication area (embedded); Administration area (embedded); Pool tests and self-assessment tools (embedded). IMPLEMENTING Moodle - 2: IMPLEMENTING Moodle - 2 The pluses: Intense collaborative work (within the groups and the class); Development of social skills (communication…); Improved level of interactivity between peers; Substantial time savings for administration tasks (tutors); Easiness of use by students; Multiplicity of embedded tools; Threaded discussions are possible; Open source software (flexibility and availability); Expansion of the 'learning community' concept. IMPLEMENTING Moodle - 3: IMPLEMENTING Moodle - 3 The minuses: Portfolios are not developed in such a creative way; Too much interactivity (discussions, chat, etc.) might have risks; … It is still a recent experience: additional data is required for a consistent comparison. PROJECT’s ACTIVITIES: PROJECT’s ACTIVITIES General purpose tasks; Common module delivery: 'Basic Teaching Skills' module @ Huddersfield, using BlackBoard; Evaluation report for module above by 'PT-Testers': VLE access: difficulties, no. of trials; Contents: categories, relevance, transferability to national context, overall structuring, portal design; Additional comments. PT-TESTERS’ KEY FINDINGS: PT-TESTERS’ KEY FINDINGS 'Unknown' VLE didn’t turn to be a major burden; 'Language issue': positive aspect, promotes practice; Involvement of 4 countries contributed for a rich learning endeavor; Strong commitment by learners is compulsory; There should be a permanent tutoring and coaching; It is critical to provide 'instant' feedback to questions and activities accomplished by learners; The way contents are organised play an important role for the success of learning. THE WAY AHEAD: THE WAY AHEAD Closing common module delivery: 'Computer Mediated Skills' module @ Huddersfield, using BlackBoard; Information sharing and further cooperation with TAOKK (also implemented Moodle); Available online again a practical example of an 'in-house web-based portal' for external examination; Reporting procedures in place, with local tutoring. You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
10 45 alcino heraklion Hufflepuff Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 216 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: June 24, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript TERESA OLIVEIRAALCINO PASCOALLOURENÇO FRAZÃOFCT-UNL | PORTUGAL: VELVITT Conference 'Portuguese Experience with VLEs' TERESA OLIVEIRA ALCINO PASCOAL LOURENÇO FRAZÃO FCT-UNL | PORTUGAL TEI of Crete | Heraklion – GREECE | October 11th, 2005 FCT-UNL IN A NUTSHELL: FCT-UNL IN A NUTSHELL Established in 1977, as part of UNL (New University of Lisbon); Approximately 6.500 undergraduate students; Offers 19 degrees in Sciences and Engineering; Offers 3 Science Teaching degrees, although 2 are suspended for the time being; Only Maths Teaching degree is fully operational. VLEs’ USAGE @ FCT-UNL: VLEs’ USAGE @ FCT-UNL No VLE adopted until 2004; Initial trials comprised the use of a proprietary platform (FCT-UNL’s Training Institute) and in-house web-based portals with reduced features; Academic year 2004-2005 marked the adoption of Moodle by FCT-UNL; Not all courses are implemented in Moodle, but the activities are expanding significantly. IN-HOUSE WB PORTALS - 1: IN-HOUSE WB PORTALS - 1 Pioneering activity of the Educational Sciences Sector; First experiments dated 1997-98; In constant use from 1998-99 up to 2003-04; Main objectives: Information repository (FAQs, courses’ syllabi); Download area (shareware software); Students’ portfolios; Administration area (calendar, summaries, etc.); Evaluation area (detailed review and final marks). IN-HOUSE WB PORTALS - 2: IN-HOUSE WB PORTALS - 2 Main features / implementations / characteristics: Companion ftp server with restricted access; Specific mailing list (Yahoo groups); Comprehensive list of educational software and other resources; Regular updates (FAQs, calendar, administration area, etc.); Support of external peers, whenever available (other tutors, software developers, etc.); Html editing compulsory for assignments; Reviewed profile: the word to the individual; Flexible templates available. IN-HOUSE WB PORTALS - 3: IN-HOUSE WB PORTALS - 3 The pluses: Intense collaborative work (within the groups and the class); Development of social skills (communication…); Exploitation of creativity with the assignments’ delivery; Development of technical skills while manipulating different types of software; Improved use of the www as a privileged source of information; Enhanced thinking and reasoning; Low level of drop-off rates; Implementation of proto-learning communities. IN-HOUSE WB PORTALS - 4: IN-HOUSE WB PORTALS - 4 The minuses: Requires huge administration work from the tutor; Students’ registration is not automated; Mailing list inefficient for sustaining a discussion; Too much flexibility with templates can be a burden for the tutor; Html editing and ftping might be complex for some students; Calendar features proved to be insufficient; Temptation to concentrate on aesthetics rather than contents; Some simple tasks are not automated: it requires extra time from students enrolled. IMPLEMENTING Moodle - 1: IMPLEMENTING Moodle - 1 Pioneering activity of the Educational Sciences Sector; First experiments dated 2003-04; In constant use from 2004-05; Main objectives: Information exchange (FAQs, working documents, courses’ syllabi); Interactive communication area (embedded); Administration area (embedded); Pool tests and self-assessment tools (embedded). IMPLEMENTING Moodle - 2: IMPLEMENTING Moodle - 2 The pluses: Intense collaborative work (within the groups and the class); Development of social skills (communication…); Improved level of interactivity between peers; Substantial time savings for administration tasks (tutors); Easiness of use by students; Multiplicity of embedded tools; Threaded discussions are possible; Open source software (flexibility and availability); Expansion of the 'learning community' concept. IMPLEMENTING Moodle - 3: IMPLEMENTING Moodle - 3 The minuses: Portfolios are not developed in such a creative way; Too much interactivity (discussions, chat, etc.) might have risks; … It is still a recent experience: additional data is required for a consistent comparison. PROJECT’s ACTIVITIES: PROJECT’s ACTIVITIES General purpose tasks; Common module delivery: 'Basic Teaching Skills' module @ Huddersfield, using BlackBoard; Evaluation report for module above by 'PT-Testers': VLE access: difficulties, no. of trials; Contents: categories, relevance, transferability to national context, overall structuring, portal design; Additional comments. PT-TESTERS’ KEY FINDINGS: PT-TESTERS’ KEY FINDINGS 'Unknown' VLE didn’t turn to be a major burden; 'Language issue': positive aspect, promotes practice; Involvement of 4 countries contributed for a rich learning endeavor; Strong commitment by learners is compulsory; There should be a permanent tutoring and coaching; It is critical to provide 'instant' feedback to questions and activities accomplished by learners; The way contents are organised play an important role for the success of learning. THE WAY AHEAD: THE WAY AHEAD Closing common module delivery: 'Computer Mediated Skills' module @ Huddersfield, using BlackBoard; Information sharing and further cooperation with TAOKK (also implemented Moodle); Available online again a practical example of an 'in-house web-based portal' for external examination; Reporting procedures in place, with local tutoring.