CH407H Project Matt JC

Fuel Cells on the High Seas: 

Fuel Cells on the High Seas Naval Applications for Fuel Cells Matt Chin and JC Sanders

Fuel Cell Types used on Ships: 

Fuel Cell Types used on Ships Molten Carbonate Large Surface Ships Proton Exchange Membrane Surface ships (usually in conjunction with Molten Carbonate fuel cells) Submarines

Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells: 

Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells Operation Temperature: 650 degrees C Electrolyte: Salt Carbonates Fuel: Syngas or Hydrogen, and Additional: CO2 due to CO3 ion usage Catalyst: Nickel Power output: ~2MW units available

Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells: 

Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells

PEM Fuel Cells: 

PEM Fuel Cells Operation Temperature: 100 degrees C Electrolyte: Polymer Fuel: Hydrogen Catalyst: Platinum Power output: 50-250 kW units available

PEM Fuel Cells: 

PEM Fuel Cells

Fuel cell advantages for surface ships: 

Fuel cell advantages for surface ships High efficiency vs. gas turbine and diesel powered naval vessels (40% vs. 16%-12%) Reduced emissions of all types Low vibration and sound levels Improved thermal efficiencies Reduced cost for fuel (30% less for Navy) Ship design flexibility (modular units) Permits the use of alternative fuels

Fuel cell advantages for submarines: 

Fuel cell advantages for submarines High efficiency vs. diesel powered submarines (40% vs. 16%-12%) Low thermal profile compared to SSNs Low vibration and sound levels Reduced radar cross section Does not require air breathing like diesel subs Only has to come up every several weeks

Practical Applications: 

Practical Applications Submarines Fuel Cells = Silence = Increased Stealth Fuel Cells = No air required = Longer dive times Surface Ships Fuel Cells = Increased efficiencies = Longer time out to sea Fuel Cells = Reduced emissions = Reduced Profile (Harder to detect)

Power Plan Efficiencies: 

Power Plan Efficiencies Courtesy of Edward House: Office of Navy Research

Developers and Researchers: 

Developers and Researchers Germany – Working prototypes and service models of fuel cell submarines Canada – Prototype for fuel cell submarine United States – Prototypes and plans for both subs and surface ships United Kingdom – Prototypes and plans for subs and surface ships

Challenges to development: 

Challenges to development Fuel Type (Logistics and Fuel Reforming) Cost and System Efficiency for Units Reliability and Maintainability Duty Cycle and Transient Response Fuel Cell Life and Contamination Fuel Cell Sensitivity to shocks and motion

Challenges – Fuel Type: 

Challenges – Fuel Type Unknown how fuel will react to shock Infrastructure for storing not yet established Method for extracting hydrogen from diesel not yet perfected

Challenges – System Costs: 

Challenges – System Costs Fuel is more expensive than other fuels Platinum catalyst- very expensive Hydrogen is expensive to process High cost of raw materials

Challenges – Contamination: 

Challenges – Contamination Anything other than hydrogen will foul PEMs Need to protect from salt water spray Many existing sources of hydrogen contain sulfur and other contaminants

Fuel Cell Power Plants: 

Fuel Cell Power Plants Power Output: 1kW – 2MW (per unit) Internal Size and Structure: Flexible and modular (Can be placed throughout ship) Fuel Type: Various (Hydrogen, Methanol, Diesel, Synthetic, Gasoline, etc.) Cost: High (New Technology) Maintenance: High (Due to lack of robustness) Types of vessels: Submarines, Destroyers, Cutters

Power Plant Comparisons: 

Power Plant Comparisons Current Types of Power Plants used on Ships Fuel Cell based Systems – The future of ships? Diesel Electric – Workhorse of the world navies. Gas Turbine – Successor to the Diesel Electric. Nuclear Powered – Power overwhelming!

Fuel Cell Submarine: 

Fuel Cell Submarine Germany’s HDW U214

Fuel Cell Ship: 

Fuel Cell Ship United States Navy DDX

Diesel Electric Power Plants: 

Diesel Electric Power Plants Power Output: 1.5kW – 30MW Internal Size and Structure: Large Housing needed for battery block and motors, distributed system Fuel Type: Diesel Cost: Low (Well established systems, simpler) Maintenance: Low (Very robust system) Types of vessels: Submarines, Destroyers, Cruisers, Frigates, Command ships

Diesel Electric Sub: 

Diesel Electric Sub USS Blueback

Diesel Electric Ship: 

Diesel Electric Ship USS Leahy (Cruiser)

Gas Turbine Power Plants: 

Gas Turbine Power Plants Power Output: 25kW – 100MW Internal Size and Structure: Large Housing needed for engines, centralized system Fuel Type: Propane, natural gas, synthetics, diesel Cost: Medium Maintenance: Low Types of vessels: Destroyers, Cruisers, Frigates

Gas Turbine Ship: 

Gas Turbine Ship US Oliver Perry Class Frigate

Nuclear Power Plants: 

Nuclear Power Plants Power Output: 10MW – 300MW Internal Size and Structure: Large Housing needed for reactor and shielding, centralized system Fuel Type: Uranium enriched rods Cost: Expensive Maintenance: Low (Fairly robust system) Types of vessels: Submarines, Aircraft Carriers, Cruisers

Nuclear Powered Ship: 

Nuclear Powered Ship USS Nimitz (Aircraft Carrier)

Nuclear Powered Sub: 

Nuclear Powered Sub USS Ohio (SSBN)

Power Plant Comparisons: 

Power Plant Comparisons CO2 Output: Fuel Cell 414 Diesel Electric 512 Gas Turbine 735 Based off of diesel fuel. NOTE: Measurements are in (grams)/(hp*hour) Data from: Office of Naval Research (2003)

Power Plant Comparisons: 

Power Plant Comparisons NOX Output: Fuel Cell <0.001 Diesel Electric 12.9 Gas Turbine 6.0 Based off of diesel fuel. NOTE: Measurements are in (grams)/(hp*hour) Data from: Office of Naval Research (2003)

Power Plant Comparisons: 

Power Plant Comparisons SOX Output: Fuel Cell 1.23 Diesel Electric 1.52 Gas Turbine 2.18 Based off of diesel fuel. NOTE: Measurements are in (grams)/(hp*hour) Data from: Office of Naval Research (2003)

Power Plant Comparisons: 

Power Plant Comparisons Annual Fuel Consumption/Costs: Fuel Cell 214,315 Diesel Electric 321,703 Gas Turbine 641,465 Based off of diesel fuel. NOTE: Measurements are in gallons/dollars 1 gallon ~ $1.00 US for Navy Data from: Office of Naval Research (2003)

Future for Fuel Cells on the High Seas?: 

Future for Fuel Cells on the High Seas? In the United States Surface Ships US Navy DD(X) Destroyer Program (Land Attack) US Navy CG(X) Cruiser Program (Detection/Interception) Submarines May utilize AIP fuel cell systems in future designs In the World 212A Class attack submarine (Germany, Italy) Type 214 attack submarine (Greece, S. Korea) Refit 209 Class attack submarine (Greece) Type 800 Dolphin Class attack submarine (Israel)

Future for Fuel Cells on the High Seas?: 

Future for Fuel Cells on the High Seas? Outlook for Fuel Cells: Pretty Good! Two fully funded programs by US Navy Adaptation for multiple sea platforms Ongoing research in various countries Sales of commercial units in Germany Actual vessel deployment in some countries