logging in or signing up 2005 Kobe Heather Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 128 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 09, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Demographic Dividends: Past, Present, and the Future: Demographic Dividends: Past, Present, and the Future Andrew Mason University of Hawaii and East-West Center Support: NIA R01-AG025488-01 Key Ideas: Key Ideas Changes in age structure interact with the economic life cycle to influence per capita income growth Two demographic dividends Share of the productive population Demand for wealth Questions: Questions How large is the dividend? How pervasive? How are the magnitude and duration of the dividend influenced by demography? Was the dividend important historically? What will be its role in the future? What is the role of policy? Recent Research: Recent Research Bloom and Canning (various); Bloom and Williamson (various) Kelley and Schmidt (various) Lee, Mason, and Miller (various); Mason (various); Mason and Lee (forthcoming) Recent research builds on many important studies conducted during the last 40 years.Useful Identities: Useful IdentitiesModeling the First Dividend: Modeling the First Dividend Growth of the support ratio measures growth in the productive share of the population: the first dividend Given labor productivity (Y/L), an increase in the growth rate of the support ratio produces an equal increase in the growth rate of output per effective consumer. Data for constructing the support ratio and the first dividend: Data for constructing the support ratio and the first dividend Population data Various sources for historical series UN Population Prospects (2005) UN long-term projections (2004) Economic lifecycle US production and consumption age-profiles (Mason et al. forthcoming). Slide8: Consumption Labor IncomeSlide9: US 1850 India 2040 Japan 20701st Dividend Summary: 1st Dividend Summary Varied historical importance Important in US 1850-1950 Negligible in India and Japan pre-1950 Baby boom and double dip Varied intensity Japan’s dividend is short and intense Negative dividends in the future Japan (very strong) and the USThe Second Dividend: The Second Dividend Definition: The growth in productivity induced by an increase in the demand for lifecycle wealth. Compositional effect: population is concentrated at older, high wealth ages Behavioral effect: increase in duration of life and retirement lead to greater accumulation of wealthCalculation of Second Dividend: Calculation of Second Dividend Demand for capital is proportional to lifecycle wealth of those 50+ Lifecycle wealth of those 50+ W(50+) = PV[C(50+)] – PV[Yl(50+)] Cross-sectional age profiles of consumption and production shift proportionately over time Productivity growth is constant Implementation: Implementation Data Same as for first dividend Other assumptions Interest rate: 3% Productivity growth: 1.5% Elasticity of output wrt capital: 0.33Cohort aged 50-54 in 2000, Japan: Cohort aged 50-54 in 2000, Japan Population Labor Income ConsumptionCalculation of wealth for cohort aged 50-54 in 2000, Japan: Calculation of wealth for cohort aged 50-54 in 2000, Japan2nd Dividend, Summary: 2nd Dividend, Summary Demography is leading to an increase in the demand for lifecycle wealth Effects are large Effects are persistent although becoming small in JapanObservations: Observations Importance of policy Relationship between capital and lifecycle wealth Output per effective consumer is not welfare Dividends are realized, in part, by shift to smaller families. Capital accumulation requires reduced consumption, i.e., no free lunch.Unanswered Questions: Unanswered Questions How do age profiles of consumption and production vary across countries and over time? How importance is capital relative to lifecycle wealth? Is it becoming more important or less? What is the role of public policy? The role of family support systems?THE END: THE END You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
2005 Kobe Heather Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 128 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 09, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Demographic Dividends: Past, Present, and the Future: Demographic Dividends: Past, Present, and the Future Andrew Mason University of Hawaii and East-West Center Support: NIA R01-AG025488-01 Key Ideas: Key Ideas Changes in age structure interact with the economic life cycle to influence per capita income growth Two demographic dividends Share of the productive population Demand for wealth Questions: Questions How large is the dividend? How pervasive? How are the magnitude and duration of the dividend influenced by demography? Was the dividend important historically? What will be its role in the future? What is the role of policy? Recent Research: Recent Research Bloom and Canning (various); Bloom and Williamson (various) Kelley and Schmidt (various) Lee, Mason, and Miller (various); Mason (various); Mason and Lee (forthcoming) Recent research builds on many important studies conducted during the last 40 years.Useful Identities: Useful IdentitiesModeling the First Dividend: Modeling the First Dividend Growth of the support ratio measures growth in the productive share of the population: the first dividend Given labor productivity (Y/L), an increase in the growth rate of the support ratio produces an equal increase in the growth rate of output per effective consumer. Data for constructing the support ratio and the first dividend: Data for constructing the support ratio and the first dividend Population data Various sources for historical series UN Population Prospects (2005) UN long-term projections (2004) Economic lifecycle US production and consumption age-profiles (Mason et al. forthcoming). Slide8: Consumption Labor IncomeSlide9: US 1850 India 2040 Japan 20701st Dividend Summary: 1st Dividend Summary Varied historical importance Important in US 1850-1950 Negligible in India and Japan pre-1950 Baby boom and double dip Varied intensity Japan’s dividend is short and intense Negative dividends in the future Japan (very strong) and the USThe Second Dividend: The Second Dividend Definition: The growth in productivity induced by an increase in the demand for lifecycle wealth. Compositional effect: population is concentrated at older, high wealth ages Behavioral effect: increase in duration of life and retirement lead to greater accumulation of wealthCalculation of Second Dividend: Calculation of Second Dividend Demand for capital is proportional to lifecycle wealth of those 50+ Lifecycle wealth of those 50+ W(50+) = PV[C(50+)] – PV[Yl(50+)] Cross-sectional age profiles of consumption and production shift proportionately over time Productivity growth is constant Implementation: Implementation Data Same as for first dividend Other assumptions Interest rate: 3% Productivity growth: 1.5% Elasticity of output wrt capital: 0.33Cohort aged 50-54 in 2000, Japan: Cohort aged 50-54 in 2000, Japan Population Labor Income ConsumptionCalculation of wealth for cohort aged 50-54 in 2000, Japan: Calculation of wealth for cohort aged 50-54 in 2000, Japan2nd Dividend, Summary: 2nd Dividend, Summary Demography is leading to an increase in the demand for lifecycle wealth Effects are large Effects are persistent although becoming small in JapanObservations: Observations Importance of policy Relationship between capital and lifecycle wealth Output per effective consumer is not welfare Dividends are realized, in part, by shift to smaller families. Capital accumulation requires reduced consumption, i.e., no free lunch.Unanswered Questions: Unanswered Questions How do age profiles of consumption and production vary across countries and over time? How importance is capital relative to lifecycle wealth? Is it becoming more important or less? What is the role of public policy? The role of family support systems?THE END: THE END