logging in or signing up DiseaseUpdate04 Haralda Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 34 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 04, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript DISEASE UPDATE 04Paul E. Bertrand: DISEASE UPDATE 04 Paul E. BertrandSPOTTED WILT: SPOTTED WILT TILLAGE TRANSPLANTS ADMIRE ACTIGARDTILLAGE: TILLAGE FIELD WEEDSWHEAT (GRASSES)AS A TSWV SOURCE: WHEAT (GRASSES) AS A TSWV SOURCEWHEAT (GRASSES)AS A TSWV SOURCE: WHEAT (GRASSES) AS A TSWV SOURCE 1. MOST THRIPS LEAVING WHEAT ARE CEREAL THRIPS WHICH DO NOT TRANSMIT TSWV. WHEAT (GRASSES)AS A TSWV SOURCE: WHEAT (GRASSES) AS A TSWV SOURCE 1. MOST THRIPS LEAVING WHEAT ARE CEREAL THRIPS WHICH DO NOT TRANSMIT TSWV. 2. WHEAT IS NOT A TSWV HOST.TSWV: TSWV ACQUIRED FOR TRANSMISSION ONLY BY JUVENILES and ---TSWV: TSWV NECESSARY JUVENILE STAGE EXISTS ONLY 12 - 15 HRS. so ---TSWV: TSWV TO TRANSMIT TSWV LATER THRIPS MUST HATCH ON OR NEAR INFECTED PLANTSWHEAT (GRASSES)AS A TSWV SOURCE: WHEAT (GRASSES) AS A TSWV SOURCE 1. MOST THRIPS LEAVING WHEAT ARE CEREAL THRIPS WHICH DO NOT TRANSMIT TSWV. 2. WHEAT IS NOT A TSWV HOST. 3. TOBACCO THRIPS HATCHED ON WHEAT HAVE NO OPPORTUNITY TO ACQUIRE TSWV. Slide11: IN FIELD WEED MANAGEMENTIN FIELD WEEDMANAGEMENT: IN FIELD WEED MANAGEMENT CLEAN ROWS WEEDY ROWS WHEAT ROWSIN FIELD WEEDMANAGEMENT: IN FIELD WEED MANAGEMENT 2 ROW 4 ROW 8 ROW TOBACCOSlide16: 2004 EARLY WEEDS SUMNER: 42/90 ELISA+ GRINER: 58/90 ELISA+ EFFECT OF COVER ON SPOTTED WILT: EFFECT OF COVER ON SPOTTED WILT NEXT TO COVEREFFECT OF COVER ON SPOTTED WILT: EFFECT OF COVER ON SPOTTED WILT NEXT TO COVEREFFECT OF COVER ON SPOTTED WILT: EFFECT OF COVER ON SPOTTED WILT NEXT TO COVERSlide20: WHEAT SUMNER: 0/90 ELISA+ GRINER: 0/90 ELISA+Slide21: REDISTRIBUTION OF ADULT THRIPS FROM WHEAT ?SUMNER FARM: SUMNER FARM ROW FROM COVER % TSWVGRINER FARM: GRINER FARM ROW FROM COVER % TSWVWHEAT (GRASSES)AS A TSWV SOURCE: WHEAT (GRASSES) AS A TSWV SOURCE 1. NOT A SOURCE but 2. CAN PLAY A ROLETILLAGE: TILLAGE STRIP TILLSlide27: 2001 -2003RESULTS: RESULTS % TSWV but---Slide29: 2004 LITTER LEFT STANDINGSlide31: LAY BY LITTER CUT OUT 5 WEEKS POST TP2004 RESULTS: 2004 RESULTS % TSWVHOUSE PLANTSvsBED PLANTS: HOUSE PLANTS vs BED PLANTSSlide34: ARE THE PLANTS THEMSELVES DIFFERENT ?HOUSE vs BED PLANTS: HOUSE vs BED PLANTS 9 SOURCES OF PLANTS COLLECTED THE SAME DAY GROWN AT 2 LOCATIONS SET THE SAME DAY ADMIRE 2.0 oz /1,000 (TPW)2003 PLANT TRIALRESULTS: 2003 PLANT TRIAL RESULTS INFECTED TRANSPLANTS: INFECTED TRANSPLANTS HOUSE 0 - 1 % 2/5 LOTS HAD ONE ELISA+ PLANTINFECTED TRANSPLANTS: INFECTED TRANSPLANTS HOUSE 0 - 1 % BED 0 % 2/5 LOTS HAD ONE ELISA+ PLANTEFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE: EFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE % TSWVEFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE: EFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE % TSWVEFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE: EFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE % STANDEFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE: EFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE % STANDEXPECTED RESULTS: EXPECTED RESULTS BETTER RESPONSE TO TPW ADMIRE WITH HOUSE PLANTS SOME STAND LOSS WITH BED PLANTS & TPW ADMIREUNEXPECTED RESULTS: UNEXPECTED RESULTS MORE INFECTED HOUSE PLANTS MORE TSWV WITH HOUSE PLANTS2004 PLANT TRIALRESULTS: 2004 PLANT TRIAL RESULTS EFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE: EFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE % TSWVEFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE: EFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE % TSWVEFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE: EFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE % STANDEFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE: EFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE % STAND2004 RESULTSSIMILAR TO 2003: 2004 RESULTS SIMILAR TO 2003 MORE TSWV WITH HOUSE PLANTS BETTER RESPONSE TO TPW ADMIRE WITH HOUSE PLANTS SOME STAND LOSS WITH BED PLANTS & TPW ADMIREINFECTED TRANSPLANTS: INFECTED TRANSPLANTS HOUSE 1 - 4 96 INFECTED TRANSPLANTS: INFECTED TRANSPLANTS HOUSE 1 - 4 BED 0 - 6 96 96 2004 RESULTS: 2004 RESULTS SIMILAR TSWV INFECTION IN BED AND HOUSE PLANTS NO CORRELATION BETWEEN ELISA+ TRANSPLANTS AND: STAND LOSS EARLY TSWV FINAL TSWVADMIRE: ADMIRESlide55: FLOAT HOUSES ~ 65 % OF PLANTS ADMIRE DRENCH TRT. ~ 90 % SUCCESSSlide56: PLANT BEDS ~ 30 % OF PLANTS ADMIRE TPW TRT. ~ 55 % SUCCESSADMIRE: ADMIRE BOTH METHODS CONTROL LATER APHIDS2004APPLICATION OFPROVADO TOPLANT BEDS: 2004 APPLICATION OF PROVADO TO PLANT BEDS2004 TRIALS (4): 2004 TRIALS (4)Slide60: T-RAIL HOUSES ~ 5 % OF PLANTS ADMIRE DRENCH TRT. ~ 35 % SUCCESST-RAIL HOUSES: T-RAIL HOUSES IS IRRIGATION WASHING ADMIRE OUT OF TRAYS ?2004 TRIALS (6): 2004 TRIALS (6) NOT MUCH TREATMENT DIFFERENCEACTIGARD:: ACTIGARD: TRANSPLANT TREATMENTACTIGARD + ADMIRE: ACTIGARD + ADMIREACTIGARD TREATMENT(HOUSE PLANTS): ACTIGARD TREATMENT (HOUSE PLANTS) 1.0 oz. / 100,000 PLANTS SPRAY ON 7 - 14 DAYS PRE TP SET IN PRE WETTED BEDS ACTIGARD:: ACTIGARD: FIELD SPRAYS2002 TRIALS (9): 2002 TRIALS (9)2002 RESULTS: 2002 RESULTS FINAL % TSWV2004 TRIALS (8): 2004 TRIALS (8)2004 TRIALS (8): 2004 TRIALS (8) 2004 RESULTS: 2004 RESULTS FINAL % TSWVACTIGARDFIELD SPRAYS: ACTIGARD FIELD SPRAYS NOT CONSISTANT (FARM TO FARM) 1 SPRAY INCREASED TSWV 5 SPRAYS WORK BEST: 0,7,14,21,28 DAYS POST T P $125 / Ac LAST 2 SPRAYS (21&28 DAYS) ?Slide73: BLACK SHANKBLACK SHANK : BLACK SHANK RACE 1 SITUATIONSlide75: BLACK SHANK RACE 1 DISASTERNEW RACE 0 RESISTANCEIS BASED ON ASINGLE GENE: NEW RACE 0 RESISTANCE IS BASED ON A SINGLE GENE and --- ALL HIGH RESISTANCE VARIETIES HAVETHIS GENE: ALL HIGH RESISTANCE VARIETIES HAVE THIS GENE NC-71 Sp G168 NC-72 Sp GH20 NC-297 etc.CONTINUOUS PLANTINGTHESE VARIETIESWILL SELECT RACE 1: CONTINUOUS PLANTING THESE VARIETIES WILL SELECT RACE 1BLACK SHANKRACE 1 : BLACK SHANK RACE 1 MAINTAIN OR INCREASE ROTATION TIME and --- ALTERNATE HIGH RES. WITH K-346BLACK SHANKRACE 1 : BLACK SHANK RACE 1 MAINTAIN OR INCREASE ROTATION TIME and --- ALTERNATE HIGH RES. WITH K-346 and ---USERIDOMIL: USE RIDOMIL2001 BROOKS CO.BLACK SHANK TRIAL : 2001 BROOKS CO. BLACK SHANK TRIAL % BLACK SHANK2001 BROOKS CO.BLACK SHANK TRIAL : 2001 BROOKS CO. BLACK SHANK TRIAL % BLACK SHANK You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
DiseaseUpdate04 Haralda Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 34 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 04, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript DISEASE UPDATE 04Paul E. Bertrand: DISEASE UPDATE 04 Paul E. BertrandSPOTTED WILT: SPOTTED WILT TILLAGE TRANSPLANTS ADMIRE ACTIGARDTILLAGE: TILLAGE FIELD WEEDSWHEAT (GRASSES)AS A TSWV SOURCE: WHEAT (GRASSES) AS A TSWV SOURCEWHEAT (GRASSES)AS A TSWV SOURCE: WHEAT (GRASSES) AS A TSWV SOURCE 1. MOST THRIPS LEAVING WHEAT ARE CEREAL THRIPS WHICH DO NOT TRANSMIT TSWV. WHEAT (GRASSES)AS A TSWV SOURCE: WHEAT (GRASSES) AS A TSWV SOURCE 1. MOST THRIPS LEAVING WHEAT ARE CEREAL THRIPS WHICH DO NOT TRANSMIT TSWV. 2. WHEAT IS NOT A TSWV HOST.TSWV: TSWV ACQUIRED FOR TRANSMISSION ONLY BY JUVENILES and ---TSWV: TSWV NECESSARY JUVENILE STAGE EXISTS ONLY 12 - 15 HRS. so ---TSWV: TSWV TO TRANSMIT TSWV LATER THRIPS MUST HATCH ON OR NEAR INFECTED PLANTSWHEAT (GRASSES)AS A TSWV SOURCE: WHEAT (GRASSES) AS A TSWV SOURCE 1. MOST THRIPS LEAVING WHEAT ARE CEREAL THRIPS WHICH DO NOT TRANSMIT TSWV. 2. WHEAT IS NOT A TSWV HOST. 3. TOBACCO THRIPS HATCHED ON WHEAT HAVE NO OPPORTUNITY TO ACQUIRE TSWV. Slide11: IN FIELD WEED MANAGEMENTIN FIELD WEEDMANAGEMENT: IN FIELD WEED MANAGEMENT CLEAN ROWS WEEDY ROWS WHEAT ROWSIN FIELD WEEDMANAGEMENT: IN FIELD WEED MANAGEMENT 2 ROW 4 ROW 8 ROW TOBACCOSlide16: 2004 EARLY WEEDS SUMNER: 42/90 ELISA+ GRINER: 58/90 ELISA+ EFFECT OF COVER ON SPOTTED WILT: EFFECT OF COVER ON SPOTTED WILT NEXT TO COVEREFFECT OF COVER ON SPOTTED WILT: EFFECT OF COVER ON SPOTTED WILT NEXT TO COVEREFFECT OF COVER ON SPOTTED WILT: EFFECT OF COVER ON SPOTTED WILT NEXT TO COVERSlide20: WHEAT SUMNER: 0/90 ELISA+ GRINER: 0/90 ELISA+Slide21: REDISTRIBUTION OF ADULT THRIPS FROM WHEAT ?SUMNER FARM: SUMNER FARM ROW FROM COVER % TSWVGRINER FARM: GRINER FARM ROW FROM COVER % TSWVWHEAT (GRASSES)AS A TSWV SOURCE: WHEAT (GRASSES) AS A TSWV SOURCE 1. NOT A SOURCE but 2. CAN PLAY A ROLETILLAGE: TILLAGE STRIP TILLSlide27: 2001 -2003RESULTS: RESULTS % TSWV but---Slide29: 2004 LITTER LEFT STANDINGSlide31: LAY BY LITTER CUT OUT 5 WEEKS POST TP2004 RESULTS: 2004 RESULTS % TSWVHOUSE PLANTSvsBED PLANTS: HOUSE PLANTS vs BED PLANTSSlide34: ARE THE PLANTS THEMSELVES DIFFERENT ?HOUSE vs BED PLANTS: HOUSE vs BED PLANTS 9 SOURCES OF PLANTS COLLECTED THE SAME DAY GROWN AT 2 LOCATIONS SET THE SAME DAY ADMIRE 2.0 oz /1,000 (TPW)2003 PLANT TRIALRESULTS: 2003 PLANT TRIAL RESULTS INFECTED TRANSPLANTS: INFECTED TRANSPLANTS HOUSE 0 - 1 % 2/5 LOTS HAD ONE ELISA+ PLANTINFECTED TRANSPLANTS: INFECTED TRANSPLANTS HOUSE 0 - 1 % BED 0 % 2/5 LOTS HAD ONE ELISA+ PLANTEFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE: EFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE % TSWVEFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE: EFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE % TSWVEFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE: EFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE % STANDEFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE: EFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE % STANDEXPECTED RESULTS: EXPECTED RESULTS BETTER RESPONSE TO TPW ADMIRE WITH HOUSE PLANTS SOME STAND LOSS WITH BED PLANTS & TPW ADMIREUNEXPECTED RESULTS: UNEXPECTED RESULTS MORE INFECTED HOUSE PLANTS MORE TSWV WITH HOUSE PLANTS2004 PLANT TRIALRESULTS: 2004 PLANT TRIAL RESULTS EFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE: EFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE % TSWVEFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE: EFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE % TSWVEFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE: EFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE % STANDEFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE: EFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE % STAND2004 RESULTSSIMILAR TO 2003: 2004 RESULTS SIMILAR TO 2003 MORE TSWV WITH HOUSE PLANTS BETTER RESPONSE TO TPW ADMIRE WITH HOUSE PLANTS SOME STAND LOSS WITH BED PLANTS & TPW ADMIREINFECTED TRANSPLANTS: INFECTED TRANSPLANTS HOUSE 1 - 4 96 INFECTED TRANSPLANTS: INFECTED TRANSPLANTS HOUSE 1 - 4 BED 0 - 6 96 96 2004 RESULTS: 2004 RESULTS SIMILAR TSWV INFECTION IN BED AND HOUSE PLANTS NO CORRELATION BETWEEN ELISA+ TRANSPLANTS AND: STAND LOSS EARLY TSWV FINAL TSWVADMIRE: ADMIRESlide55: FLOAT HOUSES ~ 65 % OF PLANTS ADMIRE DRENCH TRT. ~ 90 % SUCCESSSlide56: PLANT BEDS ~ 30 % OF PLANTS ADMIRE TPW TRT. ~ 55 % SUCCESSADMIRE: ADMIRE BOTH METHODS CONTROL LATER APHIDS2004APPLICATION OFPROVADO TOPLANT BEDS: 2004 APPLICATION OF PROVADO TO PLANT BEDS2004 TRIALS (4): 2004 TRIALS (4)Slide60: T-RAIL HOUSES ~ 5 % OF PLANTS ADMIRE DRENCH TRT. ~ 35 % SUCCESST-RAIL HOUSES: T-RAIL HOUSES IS IRRIGATION WASHING ADMIRE OUT OF TRAYS ?2004 TRIALS (6): 2004 TRIALS (6) NOT MUCH TREATMENT DIFFERENCEACTIGARD:: ACTIGARD: TRANSPLANT TREATMENTACTIGARD + ADMIRE: ACTIGARD + ADMIREACTIGARD TREATMENT(HOUSE PLANTS): ACTIGARD TREATMENT (HOUSE PLANTS) 1.0 oz. / 100,000 PLANTS SPRAY ON 7 - 14 DAYS PRE TP SET IN PRE WETTED BEDS ACTIGARD:: ACTIGARD: FIELD SPRAYS2002 TRIALS (9): 2002 TRIALS (9)2002 RESULTS: 2002 RESULTS FINAL % TSWV2004 TRIALS (8): 2004 TRIALS (8)2004 TRIALS (8): 2004 TRIALS (8) 2004 RESULTS: 2004 RESULTS FINAL % TSWVACTIGARDFIELD SPRAYS: ACTIGARD FIELD SPRAYS NOT CONSISTANT (FARM TO FARM) 1 SPRAY INCREASED TSWV 5 SPRAYS WORK BEST: 0,7,14,21,28 DAYS POST T P $125 / Ac LAST 2 SPRAYS (21&28 DAYS) ?Slide73: BLACK SHANKBLACK SHANK : BLACK SHANK RACE 1 SITUATIONSlide75: BLACK SHANK RACE 1 DISASTERNEW RACE 0 RESISTANCEIS BASED ON ASINGLE GENE: NEW RACE 0 RESISTANCE IS BASED ON A SINGLE GENE and --- ALL HIGH RESISTANCE VARIETIES HAVETHIS GENE: ALL HIGH RESISTANCE VARIETIES HAVE THIS GENE NC-71 Sp G168 NC-72 Sp GH20 NC-297 etc.CONTINUOUS PLANTINGTHESE VARIETIESWILL SELECT RACE 1: CONTINUOUS PLANTING THESE VARIETIES WILL SELECT RACE 1BLACK SHANKRACE 1 : BLACK SHANK RACE 1 MAINTAIN OR INCREASE ROTATION TIME and --- ALTERNATE HIGH RES. WITH K-346BLACK SHANKRACE 1 : BLACK SHANK RACE 1 MAINTAIN OR INCREASE ROTATION TIME and --- ALTERNATE HIGH RES. WITH K-346 and ---USERIDOMIL: USE RIDOMIL2001 BROOKS CO.BLACK SHANK TRIAL : 2001 BROOKS CO. BLACK SHANK TRIAL % BLACK SHANK2001 BROOKS CO.BLACK SHANK TRIAL : 2001 BROOKS CO. BLACK SHANK TRIAL % BLACK SHANK