logging in or signing up heat health warning system Goldie Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 187 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 29, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide2: How Are These Systems Unique? A custom-made system is developed for each urban area, based on specific meteorology for each locale, as well as urban structure and demographics These systems are based on actual weather-health relationships, as determined by daily variations in human mortality These systems are based on much more than just temperature and humiditySlide3: World Meteorological Organization Showcase Projects Center for Climatic Research, University of Delaware Participating Cities: - Dayton/Cincinnati, USA - New Orleans, USA - Philadelphia, USA - Phoenix, USA - Rome, Italy - Shanghai, China - Toronto, Canada - Washington, USA - Five additional cities, Southern USA - Chicago/St. Louis, New for 2003Slide4: Maximum Temperature vs. Daily Mortality: New York and Jacksonville, Florida New York JacksonvilleSlide5: Maximum Temperature Health Thresholds Boston 30ºC Atlanta 32ºC Dallas 40ºC Denver 34ºC Phoenix 44ºCCook County, Illinois: July ‘95: Cook County, Illinois: July ‘95Slide7: Steps in System Development Step 1: Determine air masses daily over a city using newly-developed Spatial Synoptic Classification (SSC) Step 2: Are any of these air masses ‘offensive’? Step 3: What aspects of the offensive air mass make it most detrimental to human health?SSC Air Mass Types: SSC Air Mass Types DP Dry Polar (cP) DM Dry Moderate (Pacific) DT Dry Tropical (cT) MP Moist Polar (mP) MM Moist Moderate (Overrunning) MT Moist Tropical (mT) MT+ Moist Tropical Plus TR Transition between air masses ---------------- Sheridan, S.C., 2002: The redevelopment of a weather-type classification scheme for North America. Int’. J. Climatology. Kalkstein et al., 1996, A New Spatial Synoptic Classification: Application to Air Mass Analysis. Int. J. Climatology. Characteristics of PittsburghAir Mass Types: Characteristics of Pittsburgh Air Mass TypesSlide10: Removing Non-Climatological Noise from the Mortality DataPhoenix’s Rising Mortality: Phoenix’s Rising MortalitySlide12: Mean Deaths in Rome by Day standardization is importantResults: Offensive Air Mass Types: Results: Offensive Air Mass Types Moist Tropical Plus (MT+): Very warm, humid High overnight temperatures Dry Tropical (DT): Hot, dry High solar load Dry Tropical Plus (DT+; Phoenix only): Extremely hot, dry High solar load Mean Mortality Increases: Mean Mortality IncreasesMean Anomalous Mortality by Weather Type, Rome: Mean Anomalous Mortality by Weather Type, RomeMean Anomalous Mortality by Weather Type, Shanghai: Mean Anomalous Mortality by Weather Type, ShanghaiLikelihood of Excess MortalityToronto: Likelihood of Excess Mortality TorontoSlide18: Development of Forecast Algorithms: Within-Air Mass Category Mortality VariationsROME: ROME MT+ mortality decreases through summerROME: ROME DT mortality vs. morning temperatureSlide22: In Toronto, When a DT or MT+ Air Mass is Forecast, Three Levels of Advisory are Possible:Year-to-Year Variability: Toronto: Year-to-Year Variability: TorontoSlide29: Summary of Watches/Warnings Under NWS System and Air Mass System, Summer 2001 New Orleans, LouisianaToronto: 2001 Results: Toronto: 2001 Results Alerts June 29th (DT 71%) July 23rd (MT+ 88%) July 24th (MT+ 84%) Aug 5th (DT 65%) Emergencies June 15th (MT+ 96%) Aug 6th (DT 91%) Aug 7th (DT 93%) Aug 8th (DT 97%) Aug 9th (DT 99%) Four day run of heat emergencies Aug 6-9 would have only occurred two other times in the 46 years for which data was provided.Slide31: Steps That can be Taken When Alerts or Emergencies are Called 1. NWS alerts appropriate city agency (e.g., Department of Health, Office of Aging, etc.) 2. City develops (or already has in place) intervention plans 3. Effectiveness of system can be monitored in three manners, and improvements are implemented if there are shortcomings: --forecasting effectiveness (false positives or negatives) --accuracy in estimating health impacts of offensive weather --noting if we are saving lives. You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
heat health warning system Goldie Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 187 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 29, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide2: How Are These Systems Unique? A custom-made system is developed for each urban area, based on specific meteorology for each locale, as well as urban structure and demographics These systems are based on actual weather-health relationships, as determined by daily variations in human mortality These systems are based on much more than just temperature and humiditySlide3: World Meteorological Organization Showcase Projects Center for Climatic Research, University of Delaware Participating Cities: - Dayton/Cincinnati, USA - New Orleans, USA - Philadelphia, USA - Phoenix, USA - Rome, Italy - Shanghai, China - Toronto, Canada - Washington, USA - Five additional cities, Southern USA - Chicago/St. Louis, New for 2003Slide4: Maximum Temperature vs. Daily Mortality: New York and Jacksonville, Florida New York JacksonvilleSlide5: Maximum Temperature Health Thresholds Boston 30ºC Atlanta 32ºC Dallas 40ºC Denver 34ºC Phoenix 44ºCCook County, Illinois: July ‘95: Cook County, Illinois: July ‘95Slide7: Steps in System Development Step 1: Determine air masses daily over a city using newly-developed Spatial Synoptic Classification (SSC) Step 2: Are any of these air masses ‘offensive’? Step 3: What aspects of the offensive air mass make it most detrimental to human health?SSC Air Mass Types: SSC Air Mass Types DP Dry Polar (cP) DM Dry Moderate (Pacific) DT Dry Tropical (cT) MP Moist Polar (mP) MM Moist Moderate (Overrunning) MT Moist Tropical (mT) MT+ Moist Tropical Plus TR Transition between air masses ---------------- Sheridan, S.C., 2002: The redevelopment of a weather-type classification scheme for North America. Int’. J. Climatology. Kalkstein et al., 1996, A New Spatial Synoptic Classification: Application to Air Mass Analysis. Int. J. Climatology. Characteristics of PittsburghAir Mass Types: Characteristics of Pittsburgh Air Mass TypesSlide10: Removing Non-Climatological Noise from the Mortality DataPhoenix’s Rising Mortality: Phoenix’s Rising MortalitySlide12: Mean Deaths in Rome by Day standardization is importantResults: Offensive Air Mass Types: Results: Offensive Air Mass Types Moist Tropical Plus (MT+): Very warm, humid High overnight temperatures Dry Tropical (DT): Hot, dry High solar load Dry Tropical Plus (DT+; Phoenix only): Extremely hot, dry High solar load Mean Mortality Increases: Mean Mortality IncreasesMean Anomalous Mortality by Weather Type, Rome: Mean Anomalous Mortality by Weather Type, RomeMean Anomalous Mortality by Weather Type, Shanghai: Mean Anomalous Mortality by Weather Type, ShanghaiLikelihood of Excess MortalityToronto: Likelihood of Excess Mortality TorontoSlide18: Development of Forecast Algorithms: Within-Air Mass Category Mortality VariationsROME: ROME MT+ mortality decreases through summerROME: ROME DT mortality vs. morning temperatureSlide22: In Toronto, When a DT or MT+ Air Mass is Forecast, Three Levels of Advisory are Possible:Year-to-Year Variability: Toronto: Year-to-Year Variability: TorontoSlide29: Summary of Watches/Warnings Under NWS System and Air Mass System, Summer 2001 New Orleans, LouisianaToronto: 2001 Results: Toronto: 2001 Results Alerts June 29th (DT 71%) July 23rd (MT+ 88%) July 24th (MT+ 84%) Aug 5th (DT 65%) Emergencies June 15th (MT+ 96%) Aug 6th (DT 91%) Aug 7th (DT 93%) Aug 8th (DT 97%) Aug 9th (DT 99%) Four day run of heat emergencies Aug 6-9 would have only occurred two other times in the 46 years for which data was provided.Slide31: Steps That can be Taken When Alerts or Emergencies are Called 1. NWS alerts appropriate city agency (e.g., Department of Health, Office of Aging, etc.) 2. City develops (or already has in place) intervention plans 3. Effectiveness of system can be monitored in three manners, and improvements are implemented if there are shortcomings: --forecasting effectiveness (false positives or negatives) --accuracy in estimating health impacts of offensive weather --noting if we are saving lives.