GETI Wind

Global Energy Technologies, Inc.Wind Sail Receptor, Inc. : 

Global Energy Technologies, Inc.Wind Sail Receptor, Inc. The Wind Sail Receptor

Wind Energy : 

Wind Energy Excellent Wind Resources Wind is a Near-Term Supplemental Solution Wind is a Long-Term Primary Solution

Slide 3: 

Wind Energy

Economic Sustainability : 

Economic Sustainability Our Goal – Create an economically sustainable model. GETI’s technology does NOT rely on external subsidies for economic viability or profitability. In the meantime – added profitability X Not Competitive

Modern Windmill Technology : 

Modern Windmill Technology

NASA Comments on Existing Wind Technology : 

NASA Comments on Existing Wind Technology “One can look at two or three blade windmills and see that most of the wind goes between the blades without effect.” “Windmills for generating electricity would be much more practical than assumed, except that their efficiency is not being properly utilized.” “The windmills tested by the experimenters would not use low velocity wind. The minimum wind speed required by their "best" designs required more than 15 mph wind speed. There is no reason why 5-10 mph winds could not be utilized to create highly efficient windmills for generating electricity.”

The Wind Sail Receptor : 

The Wind Sail Receptor Industry requirements led to development of customized urethane products New, patented design for urethane wind sails called “Wind Sail Receptor”.

Windmill vs. Wind Sail Receptor : 

Windmill vs. Wind Sail Receptor Windmill Output: 1 Megawatt Operating Range: 12 – 28 MPH Footprint: Up to 200 ft. blades Up to 400 ft. towers Initial Capital Costs: $1.5 Million per unit Maintenance Requirements: 1.5 cents per KWH Noisy Operation Wind Sail Receptor Output: 1 Megawatt Operating Range: 5 – 80 MPH Footprint: 15 ft. blades 40 ft. tower Initial Capital Costs: $1.0 to $1.2 Million per unit Maintenance Requirements: 1/2 cent per KWH Quiet Operation

Size Comparison : 

Size Comparison Most windmills are over 200 feet tall with 100 foot blades. (The largest are over 600 feet tall with 200 foot blades.) Wind Sail Receptor is under 65 feet tall with 14 foot blades. Blades can even be color matched to surrounding terrain. Is bigger really better? Which would be cheaper to build and maintain?

Return on Investment : 

Return on Investment Typical Windmill Payback: 6-20 Years Wind Sail Receptor Payback: 3 Years or Less Wind Sail Results: 100 MW system working 20 hrs/day 60,800 MWH/month, 60,800,000 KWH/month Average Retail rate: 5.5 cents/KWH Gross potential income/month: $3,461,166

Windmill vs. WSR : 

Windmill vs. WSR

Torque Comparison : 

Standard Windmill Operational Range Wind Sail Receptor Operational Range Torque Comparison

Manufacturing & Maintenance : 

Manufacturing & Maintenance Typical manufacturing time for a large windmill blade – 90 days. Typical manufacturing time for a WSR blade – 15 minutes. Typical time/cost to replace a large windmill blade – 30 days/$200,000. Typical time/cost to replace a WSR blade – under 3 hours/$5000.

Doing the Math with the Wind Sail Receptor : 

Doing the Math with the Wind Sail Receptor Environmentally sustainable Greater design efficiency Wider wind speed operational window Less cost to build and maintain Higher return on investment

Thank You : 

Thank You Feel free to contact us for additional information