logging in or signing up ispscodelecture FunnyGuy Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 357 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (1) Dislike it (0) Added: November 06, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... By: waranchai (7 month(s) ago) good Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close Premium member Presentation Transcript International Ship and Port Facility Security Code (ISPS) Port Facility Security Assessment Surveys : International Ship and Port Facility Security Code (ISPS) Port Facility Security Assessment Surveys Captain Howard A. Newhoff Manager, Security Royal Caribbean International Celebrity Cruises Cruise Industry Security Goals (1): Safety of our passengers and crews from unlawful acts is paramount. Safe and secure voyages and operations. Prevent the introduction on board vessels of prohibited articles: - Weapons - Explosives - Incendiaries - Hazardous materials Cruise Industry Security Goals (1)ISWG - 02/02 (2): ISWG - 02/02 (2) Prevent unauthorized access Coordination with port terminal security Reporting of all suspicious occurrences and unlawful acts to authorities: National authorities Flag states Diplomatic missions (embassies and consulates) Local law enforcement organizations Security Goals (2)Slide5: Port Facility Security Assessment Slide6: The Port Facility Security Assessment is an essential part of the process of developing and updating the port’s operations plan. It is the responsibility of the PFSO to ensure that the PFSA is carried out by a competent person/consultant and include, at a minimum: Port Facility Security Assessment • Comprehensive on-site security survey & vulnerability assessment • Identification of existing security measures & procedures and those operations requiring protection • Knowledge of threats and their likelihood coupled with a commensurate prioritization of security measures • Identification of security weaknesses, including human factors, in the port’s infrastructure, policies, and proceduresSlide7: A security assessment should include prioritized recommendations designed to reduce risk by protecting against identified threats and not the entire spectrum of non-credible threats. Port Facility Security AssessmentSlide8: With these recommendations, the PFSO and the port’s administration will be able to budget for the designing, engineering, installation, operation, and maintenance of such systems and programs as are necessary to address specific vulnerabilities. Port Facility Security AssessmentSlide9: SECURITY SURVEY OF (PASSENGER FACILITY) BY ……………………………….. (DATE) Prepared by: REPRODUCTION OF THE CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT IN WHOLE OR IN PART IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE PRIOR CONSENT OF THE COMPANY.Slide10: SECTION 1 OPERATOR AND REFERENCES 1.1 Facility Owner/Operator: 1.2 Address: 1.3 Telephone: 1.4 Facsimile: 1.5 E-mail: References: A. B. C. Slide11: SECTION 2 ………….. PORT 2.1 INTRODUCTION 2.1.1 A Protective Security Survey of (facility) was carried out on ……………. 2.1.2 This visit was made with a view to reviewing current procedures and making any recommendations regarding access control and screening for passengers, crew, visitors and baggage, guarding and physical security measures, in order to meet the requirements of References A and B, especially at higher Alert States. 2.1.3 During the visit, discussions were also held with ………….. Slide12: 2.2 AIM OF SURVEY 2.2.1 The Aim of the Survey was to make any necessary recommendations that would deter: Unauthorised or unidentified persons from entering the facility or a Designated Restricted Zone (DRZ) within the facility or from boarding any vessel. Illegal drugs, banned or hazardous materials, weapons or explosives being brought into the facility or a DRZ within the facility or taken onto any vessel. 2.2.2 The date of the last Security Survey was ……………….. 2.3 SECURITY POLICY 2.3.1 It is the policy of (facility authority) that any person wishing to enter the facility shall be liable to screening for the possession of illegal drugs, weapons, explosives or incendiaries. 2.3.2 Anyone refusing to be screened will be refused entry and may be reported to the local authorities. 2.3.3 Any person entering the facility must be authorised, identified and in possession of official documentation. Persons without these credentials may be denied entry.Slide13: 2.4 PASSENGER FACILITY SECURITY OFFICER (PFSO) 2.4.1 The PFSO, responsible for all aspects of (facility) security policy, is the (appointment). He is responsible for, but not limited to: Conducting the initial security survey and thereafter an annual security survey of the facility. Developing and maintaining the Passenger Facility Security Plan (PFSP). Modifying the PFSP to correct deficiencies and to satisfy the security requirements of the facility. Co-ordinating the implementation of the PFSP with the competent Port Authority and where applicable, the Port Security Officer. Attending the local port security committee meetings and ensuring that the recommendations in the minutes, where applicable, are actioned. Liaison with national and local Law Enforcement Agencies. Obtaining regular Threat Assessments for the facility. Slide14: Maintaining basic security details of the facility and ensuring that these are provided to the relevant Government Department, to comply with the provisions of current security legislation. Ensuring that port security measures are closely integrated with the PFSP, to ensure there is the minimum of interference with, or delay to, passenger services. 2.4.2 The PFSO is also responsible for the following: Regular security inspections of the facility. Implementing and maintaining the PFSP. Encouraging security awareness and vigilance throughout the facility. Ensuring that adequate training has been provided for all personnel responsible for security. Reporting all occurrences or suspected occurrences or unlawful acts to the Port Authority and/or Port Security Officer and ensuring that the report is forwarded to the relevant Government Department. Co-ordinating the implementation of the PFSP with the competent Ship Security Officers (SSOs) and Ship Security Plans (SSPs). Slide15: 2.4.3 The PFSO is ………………. ………….. He/she can be contacted on: Office Telephone: Home Telephone: Mobile Telephone: E-mail: 2.4.4 The Deputy PFSO is …………………… He/she can be contacted on: Office Telephone: Home Telephone: Mobile Telephone: E-mail: 3. PORT FACILITY 3.1 The facility is (dedicated for use by cruise ships and/or ferries) (also used by the following types of shipping:) 3.2 The facility is used for (major embarkation/disembarkation of passengers and/or as a port of call (only)) by cruise ships. Slide16: 4. FACILITY PERIMETER AND GUARDING 4.1 Boundary/Perimeter 4.1.1 A diagram/map showing the facility boundary/perimeter is at Annex A. 4.1.2 The boundary/perimeter is made up of the following: (fences/buildings/natural barriers) 4.1.3 (fencing) 4.1.4 (gates) 4.2 Guards 4.2.1 (permanent/reactive) 4.2.2 (reporting) 4.2.3 (patrol patterns)Slide17: 4.2.4 (armed/weapons control/orders/storage/training) 4.2.5 (communications) 4.3 Recommendations 4.3.1 5. DESIGNATED RESTRICTED ZONES (DRZ) 5.1 Policy 5.1.1 No one may enter a DRZ unless they have been identified and authorised. 5.1.2 The facility DRZ(s) consist(s) of the following: 5.1.3 Diagrams showing the DRZ(s) are attached at Annex B. (obtain maps/diagrams)Slide18: 5.2 Fencing and Security Signs 5.2.1 5.3 Patrols/Guards 5.3.1 (permanent/reactive) 5.3.2 (armed/weapons control/orders/storage/training) 5.3.3 (communications) 5.3.4 (reporting) 5.3.5 (patrol patterns) Slide19: 5.4 Recommendations 5.4.1 6. SECURITY BARRIERS 6.1 Restricted/Uncontrolled Areas 6.1.1 6.2 Fencing and Gates 6.2.1 6.3 Natural Barriers/Boundaries 6.3.1 6.4 Recommendations 6.4.1Slide20: 7. SECURITY LIGHTING 7.1 The facility (is/is not) well illuminated with flood lighting. (describe the lighting and back-up power sources) 7.2 The DRZ(s) (is/are) (not) well illuminated. (describe) 7.3 Recommendations 7.3.1Slide21: 8. CCTV 8.1 Facility System 8.1.1 8.2 Monitoring/Recording Facility 8.2.1 8.3 Recommendations 8.3.1 9. SECURITY ALARMS AND COMMUNICATIONS 9.1 Alarm Locations 9.1.1Slide22: 9.2 Types 9.2.1 9.3 Reaction Force 9.3.1 9.4 Communications 9.4.1 (emergency) 9.4.2 (discreet) 9.5 Recommendations 9.5.1 Slide23: 10. ACCESS CONTROLS AND IDENTIFICATION 10.1 Passes 10.1.1 Facility employees, other permanent workers in the DRZ(s) and regular visitors are issued with a (centrally controlled ID card with a photograph, issued by …...) 10.1.2 (permanent employees - describe) 10.1.3 (contractors) 10.1.4 (visitors) 10.1.5 (ship’s crew) 10.1.6 (cruise/ferry passengers) 10.2 Visitors Log 10.2.1 Slide24: 10.3 Recommendations 10.3.1 11. SCREENING AND SEARCH PROCEDURES 11.1 Parameters 11.1.1 (alert states/routine/intelligence based) 11.2 Equipment 11.2.1 (X-ray machines, magnetometers, hand held wands, etc.) 11.3 Employees 11.3.1Slide25: 11.4 Passengers 11.4.1 11.5 Crewmembers 11.5.1 11.6 Visitors 11.6.1 11.7 Unaccompanied Baggage 11.7.1 11.8 Commercial Vehicles 11.8.1 Slide26: 11.9 Stores and Provisions 11.9.1 11.10 Recommendations 11.10.1 12. ESSENTIAL SERVICES 12.1 The following Vulnerable Points have been identified: (detail any essential services on which the facility depends) 12.2 (detail any stand-by equipment to ensure continuity of essential services) 12.3 (detail protective measures for VPs)Slide27: 13. HIGHER ALERT STATES 13.1 The following Alert State systems are in operation. 13.1.1 (national designated authority) 13.1.2 (local) 13.2 The following additional measures are taken at higher Alert States: 13.2.1 14. CONTINGENCY PLANS 14.1 Contingency Plans have been produced for the following: Bomb Threat - Yes/No Bomb Search - Yes/No Evacuation of ships or premises - Yes/No Detonation of explosive or incendiary device - Yes/NoSlide28: 14.2 Exercises for the above situations (are/are not) carried out at regular intervals (state period). 14.3 The Crisis Response Force is (describe) 14.4 Recommendations 14.4.1 15. TRAINING 15.1 The Passenger Facility Security Officer and (his/her) Deputy (have/have not) received suitable training for their post. 15.2 Security Guards/Staff (are/are not) trained for their duties. (describe training if given – what, by whom) 15.3 A continuous and thorough training and education programme for port employees (is/is not) carried out.Slide29: 16. EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS 16.1 The following equipment should be obtained: 17. CLASSIFICATION 17.1 Notwithstanding the provisos and recommendations made in this report, the standard of security in (facility) is assessed as ADEQUATE/GOOD/VERY GOOD/EXCELLENT** **delete as appropriate Passenger Cruise Industry Long Term Security Posture: Passenger Cruise Industry Long Term Security Posture Consistency of operations Sustainability of operations Flexibility to adjust to risk conditions Compliance with laws and regulations Slide31: Contact Information Brigadier Brian Parritt Kim E. Petersen International Maritime Security (IMS) SeaSecure LLC The Garden House 3471 N. Federal Highway Little Chilmington, Suite 611 Ashford, Kent, TN23 3DN Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33306 United Kingdom USA Tel: +44 (0) 1233 643805 Tel: 1-954-567-4700 Fax: +44 (0) 1233 635290 Fax: 1-954-567-2511 Intmarsec@clara.co.uk kpetersen@seasecure.comInternational Ship and Port Facility Security Code (ISPS) Port Facility Security Assessment Surveys : International Ship and Port Facility Security Code (ISPS) Port Facility Security Assessment Surveys Captain Howard A. Newhoff Manager, Security Royal Caribbean International Celebrity Cruises You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
ispscodelecture FunnyGuy Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 357 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (1) Dislike it (0) Added: November 06, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... By: waranchai (7 month(s) ago) good Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close Premium member Presentation Transcript International Ship and Port Facility Security Code (ISPS) Port Facility Security Assessment Surveys : International Ship and Port Facility Security Code (ISPS) Port Facility Security Assessment Surveys Captain Howard A. Newhoff Manager, Security Royal Caribbean International Celebrity Cruises Cruise Industry Security Goals (1): Safety of our passengers and crews from unlawful acts is paramount. Safe and secure voyages and operations. Prevent the introduction on board vessels of prohibited articles: - Weapons - Explosives - Incendiaries - Hazardous materials Cruise Industry Security Goals (1)ISWG - 02/02 (2): ISWG - 02/02 (2) Prevent unauthorized access Coordination with port terminal security Reporting of all suspicious occurrences and unlawful acts to authorities: National authorities Flag states Diplomatic missions (embassies and consulates) Local law enforcement organizations Security Goals (2)Slide5: Port Facility Security Assessment Slide6: The Port Facility Security Assessment is an essential part of the process of developing and updating the port’s operations plan. It is the responsibility of the PFSO to ensure that the PFSA is carried out by a competent person/consultant and include, at a minimum: Port Facility Security Assessment • Comprehensive on-site security survey & vulnerability assessment • Identification of existing security measures & procedures and those operations requiring protection • Knowledge of threats and their likelihood coupled with a commensurate prioritization of security measures • Identification of security weaknesses, including human factors, in the port’s infrastructure, policies, and proceduresSlide7: A security assessment should include prioritized recommendations designed to reduce risk by protecting against identified threats and not the entire spectrum of non-credible threats. Port Facility Security AssessmentSlide8: With these recommendations, the PFSO and the port’s administration will be able to budget for the designing, engineering, installation, operation, and maintenance of such systems and programs as are necessary to address specific vulnerabilities. Port Facility Security AssessmentSlide9: SECURITY SURVEY OF (PASSENGER FACILITY) BY ……………………………….. (DATE) Prepared by: REPRODUCTION OF THE CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT IN WHOLE OR IN PART IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE PRIOR CONSENT OF THE COMPANY.Slide10: SECTION 1 OPERATOR AND REFERENCES 1.1 Facility Owner/Operator: 1.2 Address: 1.3 Telephone: 1.4 Facsimile: 1.5 E-mail: References: A. B. C. Slide11: SECTION 2 ………….. PORT 2.1 INTRODUCTION 2.1.1 A Protective Security Survey of (facility) was carried out on ……………. 2.1.2 This visit was made with a view to reviewing current procedures and making any recommendations regarding access control and screening for passengers, crew, visitors and baggage, guarding and physical security measures, in order to meet the requirements of References A and B, especially at higher Alert States. 2.1.3 During the visit, discussions were also held with ………….. Slide12: 2.2 AIM OF SURVEY 2.2.1 The Aim of the Survey was to make any necessary recommendations that would deter: Unauthorised or unidentified persons from entering the facility or a Designated Restricted Zone (DRZ) within the facility or from boarding any vessel. Illegal drugs, banned or hazardous materials, weapons or explosives being brought into the facility or a DRZ within the facility or taken onto any vessel. 2.2.2 The date of the last Security Survey was ……………….. 2.3 SECURITY POLICY 2.3.1 It is the policy of (facility authority) that any person wishing to enter the facility shall be liable to screening for the possession of illegal drugs, weapons, explosives or incendiaries. 2.3.2 Anyone refusing to be screened will be refused entry and may be reported to the local authorities. 2.3.3 Any person entering the facility must be authorised, identified and in possession of official documentation. Persons without these credentials may be denied entry.Slide13: 2.4 PASSENGER FACILITY SECURITY OFFICER (PFSO) 2.4.1 The PFSO, responsible for all aspects of (facility) security policy, is the (appointment). He is responsible for, but not limited to: Conducting the initial security survey and thereafter an annual security survey of the facility. Developing and maintaining the Passenger Facility Security Plan (PFSP). Modifying the PFSP to correct deficiencies and to satisfy the security requirements of the facility. Co-ordinating the implementation of the PFSP with the competent Port Authority and where applicable, the Port Security Officer. Attending the local port security committee meetings and ensuring that the recommendations in the minutes, where applicable, are actioned. Liaison with national and local Law Enforcement Agencies. Obtaining regular Threat Assessments for the facility. Slide14: Maintaining basic security details of the facility and ensuring that these are provided to the relevant Government Department, to comply with the provisions of current security legislation. Ensuring that port security measures are closely integrated with the PFSP, to ensure there is the minimum of interference with, or delay to, passenger services. 2.4.2 The PFSO is also responsible for the following: Regular security inspections of the facility. Implementing and maintaining the PFSP. Encouraging security awareness and vigilance throughout the facility. Ensuring that adequate training has been provided for all personnel responsible for security. Reporting all occurrences or suspected occurrences or unlawful acts to the Port Authority and/or Port Security Officer and ensuring that the report is forwarded to the relevant Government Department. Co-ordinating the implementation of the PFSP with the competent Ship Security Officers (SSOs) and Ship Security Plans (SSPs). Slide15: 2.4.3 The PFSO is ………………. ………….. He/she can be contacted on: Office Telephone: Home Telephone: Mobile Telephone: E-mail: 2.4.4 The Deputy PFSO is …………………… He/she can be contacted on: Office Telephone: Home Telephone: Mobile Telephone: E-mail: 3. PORT FACILITY 3.1 The facility is (dedicated for use by cruise ships and/or ferries) (also used by the following types of shipping:) 3.2 The facility is used for (major embarkation/disembarkation of passengers and/or as a port of call (only)) by cruise ships. Slide16: 4. FACILITY PERIMETER AND GUARDING 4.1 Boundary/Perimeter 4.1.1 A diagram/map showing the facility boundary/perimeter is at Annex A. 4.1.2 The boundary/perimeter is made up of the following: (fences/buildings/natural barriers) 4.1.3 (fencing) 4.1.4 (gates) 4.2 Guards 4.2.1 (permanent/reactive) 4.2.2 (reporting) 4.2.3 (patrol patterns)Slide17: 4.2.4 (armed/weapons control/orders/storage/training) 4.2.5 (communications) 4.3 Recommendations 4.3.1 5. DESIGNATED RESTRICTED ZONES (DRZ) 5.1 Policy 5.1.1 No one may enter a DRZ unless they have been identified and authorised. 5.1.2 The facility DRZ(s) consist(s) of the following: 5.1.3 Diagrams showing the DRZ(s) are attached at Annex B. (obtain maps/diagrams)Slide18: 5.2 Fencing and Security Signs 5.2.1 5.3 Patrols/Guards 5.3.1 (permanent/reactive) 5.3.2 (armed/weapons control/orders/storage/training) 5.3.3 (communications) 5.3.4 (reporting) 5.3.5 (patrol patterns) Slide19: 5.4 Recommendations 5.4.1 6. SECURITY BARRIERS 6.1 Restricted/Uncontrolled Areas 6.1.1 6.2 Fencing and Gates 6.2.1 6.3 Natural Barriers/Boundaries 6.3.1 6.4 Recommendations 6.4.1Slide20: 7. SECURITY LIGHTING 7.1 The facility (is/is not) well illuminated with flood lighting. (describe the lighting and back-up power sources) 7.2 The DRZ(s) (is/are) (not) well illuminated. (describe) 7.3 Recommendations 7.3.1Slide21: 8. CCTV 8.1 Facility System 8.1.1 8.2 Monitoring/Recording Facility 8.2.1 8.3 Recommendations 8.3.1 9. SECURITY ALARMS AND COMMUNICATIONS 9.1 Alarm Locations 9.1.1Slide22: 9.2 Types 9.2.1 9.3 Reaction Force 9.3.1 9.4 Communications 9.4.1 (emergency) 9.4.2 (discreet) 9.5 Recommendations 9.5.1 Slide23: 10. ACCESS CONTROLS AND IDENTIFICATION 10.1 Passes 10.1.1 Facility employees, other permanent workers in the DRZ(s) and regular visitors are issued with a (centrally controlled ID card with a photograph, issued by …...) 10.1.2 (permanent employees - describe) 10.1.3 (contractors) 10.1.4 (visitors) 10.1.5 (ship’s crew) 10.1.6 (cruise/ferry passengers) 10.2 Visitors Log 10.2.1 Slide24: 10.3 Recommendations 10.3.1 11. SCREENING AND SEARCH PROCEDURES 11.1 Parameters 11.1.1 (alert states/routine/intelligence based) 11.2 Equipment 11.2.1 (X-ray machines, magnetometers, hand held wands, etc.) 11.3 Employees 11.3.1Slide25: 11.4 Passengers 11.4.1 11.5 Crewmembers 11.5.1 11.6 Visitors 11.6.1 11.7 Unaccompanied Baggage 11.7.1 11.8 Commercial Vehicles 11.8.1 Slide26: 11.9 Stores and Provisions 11.9.1 11.10 Recommendations 11.10.1 12. ESSENTIAL SERVICES 12.1 The following Vulnerable Points have been identified: (detail any essential services on which the facility depends) 12.2 (detail any stand-by equipment to ensure continuity of essential services) 12.3 (detail protective measures for VPs)Slide27: 13. HIGHER ALERT STATES 13.1 The following Alert State systems are in operation. 13.1.1 (national designated authority) 13.1.2 (local) 13.2 The following additional measures are taken at higher Alert States: 13.2.1 14. CONTINGENCY PLANS 14.1 Contingency Plans have been produced for the following: Bomb Threat - Yes/No Bomb Search - Yes/No Evacuation of ships or premises - Yes/No Detonation of explosive or incendiary device - Yes/NoSlide28: 14.2 Exercises for the above situations (are/are not) carried out at regular intervals (state period). 14.3 The Crisis Response Force is (describe) 14.4 Recommendations 14.4.1 15. TRAINING 15.1 The Passenger Facility Security Officer and (his/her) Deputy (have/have not) received suitable training for their post. 15.2 Security Guards/Staff (are/are not) trained for their duties. (describe training if given – what, by whom) 15.3 A continuous and thorough training and education programme for port employees (is/is not) carried out.Slide29: 16. EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS 16.1 The following equipment should be obtained: 17. CLASSIFICATION 17.1 Notwithstanding the provisos and recommendations made in this report, the standard of security in (facility) is assessed as ADEQUATE/GOOD/VERY GOOD/EXCELLENT** **delete as appropriate Passenger Cruise Industry Long Term Security Posture: Passenger Cruise Industry Long Term Security Posture Consistency of operations Sustainability of operations Flexibility to adjust to risk conditions Compliance with laws and regulations Slide31: Contact Information Brigadier Brian Parritt Kim E. Petersen International Maritime Security (IMS) SeaSecure LLC The Garden House 3471 N. Federal Highway Little Chilmington, Suite 611 Ashford, Kent, TN23 3DN Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33306 United Kingdom USA Tel: +44 (0) 1233 643805 Tel: 1-954-567-4700 Fax: +44 (0) 1233 635290 Fax: 1-954-567-2511 Intmarsec@clara.co.uk kpetersen@seasecure.comInternational Ship and Port Facility Security Code (ISPS) Port Facility Security Assessment Surveys : International Ship and Port Facility Security Code (ISPS) Port Facility Security Assessment Surveys Captain Howard A. Newhoff Manager, Security Royal Caribbean International Celebrity Cruises