Determinism, Ideology and Folly in World Hunger: Determinism, Ideology and Folly in World Hunger Gidon Eshel
Dept. of the Geophysical Sciences
Univ. of Chicago
Chicago, IL 60637
Tel: (773) 702-0440
Email: geshel@uchicago.edu
Web: http://geosci.uchicago.edu/~gidon World Hunger: Causes and Consequences
Midwest Faculty Seminar, Univ. of Chicago, April 29-May 1, 2004
Plan:: is hunger inevitable?
if not, how?
if not, why not?
Plan:
World Population is: about 6.4 billion people.
At 2300 kcal a day, this means
we need about 5.4 x 1015 kcal/year globally.
World Population is
Slide4: Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
Nations , FAOSTAT Statistical Database (FAO, Rome, 1997) mean, 1997:
2.7 T/hectare or
0.27 kg/m2
Slide5: at roughly 4 kcal per gr, to feed everybody we need:
or 5 x 106 km2 every year. Allowing for an efficiency of 50%,
we get about 107 km2 per year. Since the Earth’s arable land surface
area is about1,2,31.4 x 107 km2, we have more than enough land
to feed everybody, with plenty to spare!
1: http://www.rockford-india.com/irrigation-arableland.htm
2: http://www.cnie.org/pop/conserving/landuse.htm
3: it in fact rises, at about 3 x 105 km2 (2.6 Pennsylvanias) per decade!!
are people hungry?: are people hungry? in absolute
numbers, sadly,
they are
are people hungry? : are people hungry? Source:
The UN Food
and Agriculture
Organization,
FAO 1998 yes, but as a fraction of the total
the rates are declining
Slide8: undernou-rished, % of population 1990-92 1969-71 0 25 50 75 75 50 25 0 Source:
The UN Food
and Agri-
-culture
Organization,
FAO 1997
The UN’s FAO also states that1: '... As a world average, food availability for direct human
consumption (on a per-person basis) grew 19 percent to
2720 Kcal/day between 1960 and 1994/96.'
The UN’s FAO also states that1 1: FAO Symposium on Agriculture, Trade and Food Security:
Issues and Options in the Forthcoming WTO Negotiations from
the Perspective of Developing Countries, Geneva, 23-24
September 1999, Paper 1: Salient trends in world agricultural
production, demand, trade and food security
meanwhile, as worldwide hunger rates drop, : meanwhile, as worldwide hunger rates drop, a new, perhaps just as devastating, and most likely harder to fix, problem rapidly arise...
age From:
Physical Activity
and Older
Americans:
Benefits
and Strategies.
June 2002. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the
Centers for Disease Control. http://www.ahrq.gov/ppip/activity.htm
Slide11: Historic rates of people with BMIandgt;30 kg m-2 in various countries.
(Source: Kopelman, P. G., Obesity as a medical problem. Nature,
404, April 6 2000, pp. 635-643)
Slide12: US prevalence of BMIandgt;30 in ‘91, ‘95 and 2000. Sources:
Mokdad, A. H., JAMA, 282(16), October 27, 1999, 1519-1522
Mokdad, A. H., JAMA, 286(10), September 12, 2001, 1195-1200
no data andlt;10% 10%-14% 15%-19% andgt;20%
Slide13: Global data.
Sources:
Mokdad, A. H., JAMA, 282(16), October 27, 1999, 1519-1522
Mokdad, A. H., JAMA, 286(10), September 12, 2001, 1195-1200
Slide14:
the problem with obesity 1: the problem with obesity 1 Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Promoting Active Lifestyles Among Older Adults. National
Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion.
Nutrition and Physical Activity.
the problem with obesity 2: the problem with obesity 2 Source: Thompson, D. and A. M. Wolf, 2001: The medical-care
cost burden of obesity.Obesity Reviews 2 (3), 189-197.
Australia, 1994, 2% Canada, 1999, 2.4% France, 1995, 2% N. Zealand 1997, 2.5% Portugal 2000, 3.5% USA, 1986, 5.5% USA, 1998, 5.7% USA, 1999, 7% Percentage of national
health expenditures
attributable to
obesity, by country.
the problem with obesity 3: the problem with obesity 3 '... Obesity is associated with a 36 percent increase in inpatient and outpatient spending and a 77 percent increase in medications, compared with a 21 percent increase in inpatient and outpatient spending and a 28 percent increase in medications for current smokers.' Source: Strum, R., 2002: The effects of obesity, smoking, and
drinking on medical problems and costs. Health Affairs, 21(2),
245-253
and one more: and one more years of follow-up $0 $25,000 BMIandgt;30 25andlt;BMIandlt;30 20andlt;BMIandlt;25 8 9 7 6 from Thompson, D., et al., 2001: Body Mass
Index and Future Healthcare Costs: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Obesity
Res., 9,
210-218.
so the picture is: so the picture is schematically something like time proportion of the whole
global population too much too little according to G. Gardner and B. Halwei, Worldwatch paper 150:
Overfed and Underfed, March 2000, the crossover occured in 2000, with ~1.1 billion apiece
2000
the amazing thing is: the amazing thing is that in fact, too much (obesity) does not necessarily mean abundance! '... Malnutrition and obesity
coexist in the same
settings ...' Source: Dr. Manuel Pena, the Pan American Health rganization, 'Obesity and Poverty: A New Public Health Challenge.'
what causes the shift toward obesity?: what causes the shift toward obesity? of the multitude of causes, I subjectively find
particularly important:
urbanization and other social trends
the structure of agriculture
defective distribution system, warped inputs into it
cause 1: people don’t move enough: Source: Cordain, L. et al., 1998: Physical activity, energy expenditure and fitness: An evolutionary perspective. Int. J. Sports Med., 19(5), 328-335. cause 1: people don’t move enough
cause 2: the structure of world agricultural production: cause 2: the structure of world agricultural production
the number of US farms drop: the number of US farms drop
while their size increases: while their size increases 4-firm concentration ratio From: Heller
and Keoleian,
Life cycle-
-based
sustainability
indicators
for assessment
of the US food
system. Univ.
of Michigan
Center for
Sustainable
Systems Report
No. CSS00-04,
Dec. 6 2000
e.g., takeMinnesota: e.g., take Minnesota milk production by
herd size From: Hammond,
J. W., Univ. of
Minnesota, Minn.
Ag. Econ. News-
letter, No. 697,
summer 1999
profit: only 3.5%!!: profit: only 3.5%!! Source: USDA Food Review, 2000, 23(3), 27-30.
or, worse yet: or, worse yet From: Food Marketing Institute, Annual Financial Review 2002-2003, available online at http://www.fmi.org/ a penny a
buck!!
as a result, competition is fierce: as a result, competition is fierce
and food manufacturers are desperate...: and food manufacturers are desperate... From: Table 1, page 12, Nestle, M., Food Politics, Univ. of California Press, 2002 9 leading food
manufacturers
to convince people to buy their stuff : to convince people to buy their stuff food manufacturers must process as heavily as they possibly can,
so as to 'add value'... 1998 data; from Nestle, M., Food Politics,Univ. of California Press
also, they make stuff sweet, salty and fatty: also, they make stuff sweet, salty and fatty
a huge issue is subsidies: a huge issue is subsidies Source:
Environmental
Working
Group
Farm Database
Version 2.0
http://www.ewg.org/
US data
Slide34: 2003 data. Source: National Corn Growers Association,
http://www.iowafarmer.com/corncam/corn.html
54% animal feed 8% sweeteners
Slide35: Source: http://www.biotech-info.net/ part of the reason burgers are so cheap part of the
reasons Coke is
so cheap
also, because subsidy promotes large farms: also, because subsidy promotes large farms corn subsidy concentration Source: Environmental Working Group Farm Database
Version 2.0 http://www.ewg.org/ subsidy received ‘95-’02:
top 1%: $25 billion
bottom 80%:
$15 billion
farm lobby is so damn powerful...: farm lobby is so damn powerful...
So:: So: A policy that will fight obesity is also one consistent with
fighting world hunger. Unfortunately, such a policy will be
roughly the inverse of the policies now in effect in the US.
As the New York Times (Editorial, April 13, 2004) puts it:
' ... Almost two-thirds of America's corporations
paid no federal income taxes during the late 1990's,
when corporate profits were soaring. Nine out of
10 companies paid less than the equivalent of 5
percent of their total income ... '