Presentation Transcript
Slide1 : An Introduction to the
Enhanced Fujita Scale
Mary Jo Parker
March 28, 2007 Aftermath of the Blue Ash Tornado
April 9, 1999
Topics to Be Covered : Topics to Be Covered Limitations of the Fujita Scale
Development of the Enhanced Fujita Scale
Using the EF-Scale to estimate tornado strength
The Fujita Scale : The Fujita Scale F0: 45-78 MPH
F1: 79-117 MPH
F2: 118-161 MPH
F3: 162-209 MPH
F4: 210-261 MPH
F5: 262-317 MPH
Limitations of the Fujita Scale : Limitations of the Fujita Scale Not enough damage indicators
Does not account for construction quality
No definitive correlation between damage and wind speed
Difficult to apply consistently
Overestimates wind speeds greater than F3
Why the EF-Scale was created : Why the EF-Scale was created More damage indicators
Recalibrate winds associated with F-scale ratings
Better correlation between wind and rating
Less subjective
Account for construction variability
Flexibility, Extensibility, Expandability The framed house is one of only
a few F-scale damage indicators. Evidence indicates a well constructed house
can be blown away by winds much less than
260 mph (Phan and Simiu,2003).
EF-Scale Development : EF-Scale Development Nationally renowned meteorologists and engineers developed the EF scale
Texas Tech University Wind Science and Engineering (WISE) Center
Developed 28 Damage Indicators (DI)
Building type, structure, trees
Each DI has several Degrees of Damage (DOD)
Range from no damage to total destruction
Arranged in order of increasing damage
Correlation of F-Scale and EF-Scale wind speeds
Damage Indicators (DI) : Damage Indicators (DI) Residences Commercial and Retail
Structures Schools Professional Buildings Metal Buildings and Canopies Towers and Poles Vegetation (Trees)
Degrees of Damage (DOD) : Degrees of Damage (DOD) DOD for a framed house (FR12) – DI #2
Why an upper bound and a lower bound for potential wind speeds? : Why an upper bound and a lower bound for potential wind speeds? Upper Bound Winds – Design exceeds US building codes for typical home/structure, better than average load path
Expected Winds – Design exhibits typical construction
Lower Bound Winds – Design fails to meet US building codes, poor maintenance or load path
Construction Load Path : Construction Load Path Failing Standard Building Code Standard Building Code Exceeding Standard Building Code Photos copyrighted by Tim Marshall The construction quality of the structure(s) will determine whether the wind speeds are shifted towards the upper bound or lower bound values
EF-Scale vs. F-Scale : EF-Scale vs. F-Scale Wind speeds in mph, 3-second gust
One- and Two-Family Residences (FR12) : One- and Two-Family Residences (FR12) Typical Construction:
Asphalt shingles, tile, slate or metal roof covering
Flat, gable, hip, mansard or mono-sloped roof or combination thereof
Plywood or wood plank roof deck
Prefabricated wood trusses or wood joists and rafter construction
Brick veneer, wood panels, stucco, vinyl or metal siding
Wood or metal stud walls, concrete blocks or insulating concrete panels
Attached single or double garage
One- and Two-Family Residences (FR12) : One- and Two-Family Residences (FR12) DOD for a framed house (FR12) – DI #2
One- and Two-Family Residences (FR12) : One- and Two-Family Residences (FR12) FR12 – DOD 2: Loss of roof covering (<20%)
One- and Two-Family Residences (FR12) : One- and Two-Family Residences (FR12) DOD for a framed house (FR12) – DI #2
One- and Two-Family Residences (FR12) : One- and Two-Family Residences (FR12) FR12 – DOD 4: Uplift of roof deck and loss of roof
covering (>20%); garage door collapses outward
One- and Two-Family Residences (FR12) : One- and Two-Family Residences (FR12) DOD for a framed house (FR12) – DI #2
One- and Two-Family Residences (FR12) : One- and Two-Family Residences (FR12) FR12 – DOD 7: Top floor (First floor in this case) exterior walls collapsed
One- and Two-Family Residences (FR12) : One- and Two-Family Residences (FR12) DOD for a framed house (FR12) – DI #2
One- and Two-Family Residences (FR12) : One- and Two-Family Residences (FR12) FR12 – DOD 10: Total destruction of entire building
One- and Two-Family Residences (FR12) : One- and Two-Family Residences (FR12) DOD for a framed house (FR12) – DI #2
Elementary School (ES) : Elementary School (ES) DOD for an elementary school (ES) – DI #15
Elementary School (ES) : Elementary School (ES) ES – DOD 5: Significant loss of roofing material (>20%);
uplift of roof decking
Elementary School (ES) : Elementary School (ES) DOD for an elementary school (ES) – DI #15
Elementary School (ES) : Elementary School (ES) ES – DOD 8: Uplift of entire roof structure and collapse of non-bearing walls
Elementary School (ES) : Elementary School (ES) DOD for an elementary school (ES) – DI #15
Elementary School (ES) : Elementary School (ES) ES – DOD 9: Collapse of load-bearing walls
Elementary School (ES) : Elementary School (ES) DOD for an elementary school (ES) – DI #15
EF-Scale Limitations : EF-Scale Limitations Complicated
Wind speeds subject to change for each rating
Debate continues about wind speed assignments
For More Information : For More Information www.spc.noaa.gov/efscale
Thanks to:
Dan McCarthy (Storm Prediction Center)
Jim LaDue (Warning Decision Training Branch)
EF-Scale Steering Committee
Wind Science and Engineering Center (Texas Tech University)
Slide31 : Questions?
Catch the
buzz on authorSTREAM
Copyright © 2002-2008 authorSTREAM. All rights reserved.