logging in or signing up Sung Su Truss Bridge Flemel Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 1010 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: January 01, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 1 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... By: bjmgmanmp (17 month(s) ago) thank a lot. i will use this information in to my report. 555 Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close Premium member Presentation Transcript Failure Investigation of the Sung-Su Bridges Chun K. Seong Saint Martin’s College: Failure Investigation of the Sung-Su Bridges Chun K. Seong Saint Martin’s College Introduction Sung-Su Bridge Conclusion1. Introduction: 1. Introduction Three Dimensions of Structural Art by Professor David P. Billington Scientific Dimension - efficiency Social Dimension - economy Symbolic Dimension - structure’s elegance & expressive power Scientific Dimension: Scientific Dimension Honesty to State-of-the-art to local engineering and technology Adhering to the rules of Design Process Training and skills of the Construction Personnel Diligent maintenance and inspection Social Dimension: Social Dimension Political Pressure by over-achieving officials Economic Pressure due to short and long-range economic development plan Local’s ego to have the first kind, the tallest, the longest or the largest structure Forced to conform to the land use planSymbolic Dimension: Symbolic Dimension Bridge as a public fixture for everyone Bridge as the identity of a locality Crossing a large body of water-source of relaxation, recreation, and a peaceful background, 2. Case Study : 2. Case Study Sung-Su Bridge, Seoul, Korea Welded and bolted steel truss bridge Constructed in 1979, failed in 1994 Reconstructed in 1997 Case Study - Sung-su Bridge: Case Study - Sung-su BridgeBridge Plan and Elevation: Bridge Plan and ElevationSuspended Truss at Arch Shaped Steel Truss Bridge: Suspended Truss at Arch Shaped Steel Truss BridgeRemaining Portion of Arch Shaped Steel Truss Bridge: Remaining Portion of Arch Shaped Steel Truss BridgeClose-up view of a Hinge Connection at Truss Top Chord : Close-up view of a Hinge Connection at Truss Top Chord Close-up view of a Hinge Connection at Truss Top Chord : Close-up view of a Hinge Connection at Truss Top Chord Fractured Shape of the middle Vertical Hanger: Fractured Shape of the middle Vertical Hanger Photo Taken at site Diagram of fracture surface Paints at weldFractured Flange of the West Vertical Hanger: Fractured Flange of the West Vertical HangerReconstruction of the Bridge: Reconstruction of the BridgeResult of the Investigation: Result of the Investigation Political Pressure – military rules Socio-Economic Pressure - rapid growth Conceptual Design of the Bridge Engineering - no concept of FCM Construction - no shop drawing Maintenance - by visual inspection, no access to the failed detail3. Conclusion: 3. Conclusion Bridge structure is a symbolic fixture Forming an Identity of a community Technically proven efficient design, adequately developed and funded construction - elegant structure Independent cross-checking of the design Importance of Maintenance and Inspection You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
Sung Su Truss Bridge Flemel Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 1010 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: January 01, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 1 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... By: bjmgmanmp (17 month(s) ago) thank a lot. i will use this information in to my report. 555 Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close Premium member Presentation Transcript Failure Investigation of the Sung-Su Bridges Chun K. Seong Saint Martin’s College: Failure Investigation of the Sung-Su Bridges Chun K. Seong Saint Martin’s College Introduction Sung-Su Bridge Conclusion1. Introduction: 1. Introduction Three Dimensions of Structural Art by Professor David P. Billington Scientific Dimension - efficiency Social Dimension - economy Symbolic Dimension - structure’s elegance & expressive power Scientific Dimension: Scientific Dimension Honesty to State-of-the-art to local engineering and technology Adhering to the rules of Design Process Training and skills of the Construction Personnel Diligent maintenance and inspection Social Dimension: Social Dimension Political Pressure by over-achieving officials Economic Pressure due to short and long-range economic development plan Local’s ego to have the first kind, the tallest, the longest or the largest structure Forced to conform to the land use planSymbolic Dimension: Symbolic Dimension Bridge as a public fixture for everyone Bridge as the identity of a locality Crossing a large body of water-source of relaxation, recreation, and a peaceful background, 2. Case Study : 2. Case Study Sung-Su Bridge, Seoul, Korea Welded and bolted steel truss bridge Constructed in 1979, failed in 1994 Reconstructed in 1997 Case Study - Sung-su Bridge: Case Study - Sung-su BridgeBridge Plan and Elevation: Bridge Plan and ElevationSuspended Truss at Arch Shaped Steel Truss Bridge: Suspended Truss at Arch Shaped Steel Truss BridgeRemaining Portion of Arch Shaped Steel Truss Bridge: Remaining Portion of Arch Shaped Steel Truss BridgeClose-up view of a Hinge Connection at Truss Top Chord : Close-up view of a Hinge Connection at Truss Top Chord Close-up view of a Hinge Connection at Truss Top Chord : Close-up view of a Hinge Connection at Truss Top Chord Fractured Shape of the middle Vertical Hanger: Fractured Shape of the middle Vertical Hanger Photo Taken at site Diagram of fracture surface Paints at weldFractured Flange of the West Vertical Hanger: Fractured Flange of the West Vertical HangerReconstruction of the Bridge: Reconstruction of the BridgeResult of the Investigation: Result of the Investigation Political Pressure – military rules Socio-Economic Pressure - rapid growth Conceptual Design of the Bridge Engineering - no concept of FCM Construction - no shop drawing Maintenance - by visual inspection, no access to the failed detail3. Conclusion: 3. Conclusion Bridge structure is a symbolic fixture Forming an Identity of a community Technically proven efficient design, adequately developed and funded construction - elegant structure Independent cross-checking of the design Importance of Maintenance and Inspection