logging in or signing up CMatRiskCaseStudy Fenwick Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 135 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: December 30, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide1: CM @ Risk Sanibel Island Bridges &Toll Plaza Case Study Doug Cox, PECM @ Risk: CM @ Risk OWNER Prepares Design Constructibility Reviews by CM During Design Contractor Selected Through Professional Services Code Limited to Quality Contractors Qualifications Based Selection Historical Performance of Contractor Considered CM Firm Responsible for Construction Guaranteed Maximum Price Generally Prohibit Self-Perform CM @ Risk Contract Structure: CM @ Risk Contract Structure CM FIRM (Prime Contractor) Designer OWNER ConstructibilityAdvantages of CM @ Risk: Advantages of CM @ Risk Time Eliminate Bidding & Contract Execution Time Bidding Prior to Completion of Design Flexibility to Re-Bid or BAFO Cost Approximately Same Costs (Assignment of Risk) Requires CM Fee Claims Reduced Risk Construction Contract Between CM & Contractor Shifted from Owner to CM Firm Innovation Excellent Use of Contractor & Designer Linkage Technical Qualifications Based Selection Address Non-Traditional Aspects Allows for Significant Changes During ConstructionCM @ Risk Process: CM @ Risk Process Owner hires designer Owner hires CM firm CM Firm provides construction input (cost, constructability, schedule, etc) throughout design development CM Firm is asked by Owner to give GMP Construction is added by Task Order May not ever have a Task Order Program Advancement: Program Advancement Framework for building shelf Allows corridor segmentation Multiple construction projects (Sanibel had 5 different Task Orders for project components) Fast implementation CM @ Risk Implementation: CM @ Risk Implementation Modify Design Project Scope Amend Work Program/CIP to add CM Phase Cost of CM Fee during design $250,000 to $500,000 Based on Actual Work Assigned Procure CM Services Phase 1 Constructibility reviews during design Subsequent phases included in scope, subject to authorization Program subsequent phases based on fund availability and prioritiesCM @ Risk Advantages: CM @ Risk Advantages Provides ability to advance some or all of construction phase Provides quality-based selection for contractor Creates framework for design and construction innovation Sanibel Island Bridges – Case Study: Sanibel Island Bridges – Case Study Lee County planned conventional Design-Bid-Build PD&E indicated 2 conventional bridges “B&C” could last 10-12 years PD&E indicated Bascule Bridge “A” could be renovated and last 15 years Lee County hired two designers in July 02: Replace Bridges “B&C” Renovate Bridge “A” December 02 – First Span Bridge “B” fell in water Lee County re-evaluated all three bridges and found major deterioration – needed replacing ASAP Lee County advertised for CM @ Risk – February 03 Sanibel Island Bridges – Case Study: Sanibel Island Bridges – Case Study Lee County announced replacing all three bridges: Bridge “A” – 65’ High Rise Bridges B & C – Same type as current Hired Jacobs as CM Firm to expedite construction Modified Bridge “A” contract From: Modify Bascule Bridge To: Replace with new 65’ High Rise Bridge Jacobs issued Task Order Constructability Review of plans Pre-Qualify / Short List contractors Sanibel Island filed law suit to stop High Rise Bridge construction (Permits not issued by Coast Guard) Jacobs advertised Bridge “B” & Bridge “C” @90% plans. Received Bids. Sanibel Island Bridges – Case Study: Sanibel Island Bridges – Case Study Jacobs submitted GMP to Lee County w/10% Contingency (Owner Owns) Issued Phase I Contract for Bridge “B” w/Permit Application Drawing Drove several “Test Piles” while waiting on Permits Gained 7-12 months on schedule Gambled on Permits being issued as submitted Requested several BAFO from Contractor to lower cost due to high bidsSanibel Island Bridges: Sanibel Island Bridges CM @ Risk Phased construction of three bridges BAFO after contractors bids provided Modified program based on finances available Staged permit approvals Sanibel Island Bridges: Sanibel Island BridgesSanibel Island Bridges: Sanibel Island BridgesSanibel Island Bridges: Sanibel Island BridgesSanibel Island Bridges: Sanibel Island BridgesSanibel Island Bridges: Sanibel Island BridgesSanibel Island Bridges: Sanibel Island BridgesSanibel Island Bridges: Sanibel Island BridgesSanibel Island Bridges: Sanibel Island Bridges You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
CMatRiskCaseStudy Fenwick Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 135 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: December 30, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide1: CM @ Risk Sanibel Island Bridges &Toll Plaza Case Study Doug Cox, PECM @ Risk: CM @ Risk OWNER Prepares Design Constructibility Reviews by CM During Design Contractor Selected Through Professional Services Code Limited to Quality Contractors Qualifications Based Selection Historical Performance of Contractor Considered CM Firm Responsible for Construction Guaranteed Maximum Price Generally Prohibit Self-Perform CM @ Risk Contract Structure: CM @ Risk Contract Structure CM FIRM (Prime Contractor) Designer OWNER ConstructibilityAdvantages of CM @ Risk: Advantages of CM @ Risk Time Eliminate Bidding & Contract Execution Time Bidding Prior to Completion of Design Flexibility to Re-Bid or BAFO Cost Approximately Same Costs (Assignment of Risk) Requires CM Fee Claims Reduced Risk Construction Contract Between CM & Contractor Shifted from Owner to CM Firm Innovation Excellent Use of Contractor & Designer Linkage Technical Qualifications Based Selection Address Non-Traditional Aspects Allows for Significant Changes During ConstructionCM @ Risk Process: CM @ Risk Process Owner hires designer Owner hires CM firm CM Firm provides construction input (cost, constructability, schedule, etc) throughout design development CM Firm is asked by Owner to give GMP Construction is added by Task Order May not ever have a Task Order Program Advancement: Program Advancement Framework for building shelf Allows corridor segmentation Multiple construction projects (Sanibel had 5 different Task Orders for project components) Fast implementation CM @ Risk Implementation: CM @ Risk Implementation Modify Design Project Scope Amend Work Program/CIP to add CM Phase Cost of CM Fee during design $250,000 to $500,000 Based on Actual Work Assigned Procure CM Services Phase 1 Constructibility reviews during design Subsequent phases included in scope, subject to authorization Program subsequent phases based on fund availability and prioritiesCM @ Risk Advantages: CM @ Risk Advantages Provides ability to advance some or all of construction phase Provides quality-based selection for contractor Creates framework for design and construction innovation Sanibel Island Bridges – Case Study: Sanibel Island Bridges – Case Study Lee County planned conventional Design-Bid-Build PD&E indicated 2 conventional bridges “B&C” could last 10-12 years PD&E indicated Bascule Bridge “A” could be renovated and last 15 years Lee County hired two designers in July 02: Replace Bridges “B&C” Renovate Bridge “A” December 02 – First Span Bridge “B” fell in water Lee County re-evaluated all three bridges and found major deterioration – needed replacing ASAP Lee County advertised for CM @ Risk – February 03 Sanibel Island Bridges – Case Study: Sanibel Island Bridges – Case Study Lee County announced replacing all three bridges: Bridge “A” – 65’ High Rise Bridges B & C – Same type as current Hired Jacobs as CM Firm to expedite construction Modified Bridge “A” contract From: Modify Bascule Bridge To: Replace with new 65’ High Rise Bridge Jacobs issued Task Order Constructability Review of plans Pre-Qualify / Short List contractors Sanibel Island filed law suit to stop High Rise Bridge construction (Permits not issued by Coast Guard) Jacobs advertised Bridge “B” & Bridge “C” @90% plans. Received Bids. Sanibel Island Bridges – Case Study: Sanibel Island Bridges – Case Study Jacobs submitted GMP to Lee County w/10% Contingency (Owner Owns) Issued Phase I Contract for Bridge “B” w/Permit Application Drawing Drove several “Test Piles” while waiting on Permits Gained 7-12 months on schedule Gambled on Permits being issued as submitted Requested several BAFO from Contractor to lower cost due to high bidsSanibel Island Bridges: Sanibel Island Bridges CM @ Risk Phased construction of three bridges BAFO after contractors bids provided Modified program based on finances available Staged permit approvals Sanibel Island Bridges: Sanibel Island BridgesSanibel Island Bridges: Sanibel Island BridgesSanibel Island Bridges: Sanibel Island BridgesSanibel Island Bridges: Sanibel Island BridgesSanibel Island Bridges: Sanibel Island BridgesSanibel Island Bridges: Sanibel Island BridgesSanibel Island Bridges: Sanibel Island BridgesSanibel Island Bridges: Sanibel Island Bridges