Symbolic Logic: The Language of Modern Logic: Symbolic Logic: The Language of Modern Logic Technique for analysis of deductive arguments
English (or any) language: can make any argument appear vague, ambiguous; especially with use of things like metaphors, idioms, emotional appeals, etc.
Avoid these difficulties to move into logical heart of argument: use symbolic language
Now can formulate an argument with precision
Symbols facilitate our thinking about an argument
These are called “logical connectives”
Logical Connectives: Logical Connectives The relations between elements that every deductive argument must employ
Helps us focus on internal structure of propositions and arguments
We can translate arguments from sentences and propositions into symbolic logic form
“Simple statement”: does not contain any other statement as a component
“Charlie is neat”
“Compound statement”: does contain another statement as a component
“Charlie is neat and Charlie is sweet”
Conjunction: Conjunction Conjunction of two statements: “…and…”
Each statement is called a conjunct
“Charlie is neat” (conjunct 1)
“Charlie is sweet” (conjunct 2)
The symbol for conjunction is a dot •
(Can also be “&”)
p • q
P and q (2 conjuncts)
Truth Values: Truth Values Truth value: every statement is either T or F; the truth value of a true statement is true; the truth value of a false statement is false
Truth Values of Conjunction: Truth Values of Conjunction Truth value of conjunction of 2 statements is determined entirely by the truth values of its two conjuncts
A conjunction statement is truth-functional compound statement
Therefore our symbol “•” (or “&”) is a truth-functional connective
Truth Table of Conjunction •: Truth Table of Conjunction • Given any two statements, p and q A conjunction is true if and only if both conjuncts are true
Abbreviation of Statements: Abbreviation of Statements “Charlie’s neat and Charlie’s sweet.”
N • S
Dictionary: N=“Charlie’s neat” S=“Charlie’s sweet”
Can choose any letter to symbolize each conjunct, but it is best to choose one relating to the content of that conjunct to make your job easier
“Byron was a great poet and a great adventurer.”
P • A
“Lewis was a famous explorer and Clark was a famous explorer.”
L • C
Slide8: “Jones entered the country at New York and went straight to Chicago.”
“and” here does not signify a conjunction
Can’t say “Jones went straight to Chicago and entered the country at New York.”
Therefore cannot use the • here
Some other words that can signify conjunction:
But
Yet
Also
Still
However
Moreover
Nevertheless
(comma)
(semicolon)
Negation: Negation Negation: contradictory or denial of a statement
“not”
i.e. “It is not the case that…”
The symbol for negation is tilde ~
If M=“All humans are mortal,” then
~M=“It is not the case that all humans are mortal.”
~M=“Some humans are not mortal.”
~M=“Not all humans are mortal.”
~M=“It is false that all humans are mortal.”
All these can be symbolized with ~M
Truth Table for Negation: Truth Table for Negation Where p is any statement, its negation is ~p
Disjunction: Disjunction Disjunction of two statements: “…or…”
Symbol is “ v ” (wedge) (i.e. A v B = A or B)
Weak (inclusive) sense: can be either case, and possibly both
Ex. “Salad or dessert” (well, you can have both)
We will treat all disjunctions in this sense (unless a problem explicitly says otherwise)
Strong (exclusive) sense: one and only one
Ex. “A or B” (you can have A or B, at least one but not both)
The two component statements so combined are called “disjuncts”
Disjunction Truth Table: Disjunction Truth Table A (weak) disjunction is false only in the case that both its disjuncts are false
Disjunction: Disjunction Translate: “You will do poorly on the exam unless you study.”
P=“You will do poorly on the exam.”
S=“You study.”
P v S
“Unless” = v
Punctuation: Punctuation As in mathematics, it is important to correctly punctuate logical parts of an argument
Ex. (2x3)+6 = 12 whereas 2x(3+6)= 18
Ex. p • q v r (this is ambiguous)
To avoid ambiguity and make meaning clear
Make sure to order sets of parentheses when necessary:
Example: { A • [(B v C) • (C v D)] } • ~E
{ [ ( ) ] }
Punctuation: Punctuation “Either Fillmore or Harding was the greatest American president.”
F v H
To say “Neither Fillmore nor Harding was the greatest American president.” (the negation of the first statement)
~(F v H) OR (~F) • (~H)
Punctuation: Punctuation “Jamal and Derek will both not be elected.”
~J • ~D
In any formula the negation symbol will be understood to apply to the smallest statement that the punctuation permits
i.e. above is NOT taken to mean “~[J • (~D)]”
“Jamal and Derek both will not be elected.”
~(J •D)
Example: Example Rome is the capital of Italy or Rome is the capital of Spain.
I=“Rome is the capital of Italy”
S=“Rome is the capital of Spain”
I v S
Now that we have the logical formula, we can use the truth tables to figure out the truth value of this statement
When doing truth values, do the innermost conjunctions/disjunctions/negations first, working your way outwards
Slide18: I v S We know that Rome is the capital of Italy and that Rome is not the capital of Spain.
So we know that “I” is True, and that “S” is False. We put these values directly under their corresponding letter We know that for a disjunction, if at least one of the disjuncts is T, this is enough to make the whole disjunction T
We put this truth value (that of the whole disjunction) under the v (wedge)
Note: Note When doing truth values, do the innermost conjunctions/disjunctions/negations first, working your way outwards
Ex. Do ( ) first, then [ ], then finally { }
Homework: Page 309-310 Part I (try 5 of these) Page 310 Part II (try 10 of these)