logging in or signing up Building resilience to landslides in mountain communities Dr_Dave Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT lite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 220 Category: Science & Tech.. License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 12, 2011 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description Seminar to the Durham University Institute of Hazard, Risk and Resilience in October 2011 Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Building resilience to landslides in mountain communities: Building resilience to landslides in mountain communities Dave Petley Wilson Professor of Hazard and Risk Director, Institute of Hazard, Risk and Resilience http://blogs.agu.org/landslideblog/Schedule: Schedule Introduction – why landslides matter The imbalanced geographic distribution of landslides worldwide – the burden carried by developing countries The developing country landslide knowledge-deficit Ways to manage and mitigate landslide impacts The Hong Kong experience Ways forward for developing countriesVideos: VideosGlobal landslide distribution 2004 - 2010: Global landslide distribution 2004 - 2010East Asia: East AsiaSouth Asia: South AsiaSE. Asia: SE. AsiaCentral America and Caribbean: Central America and CaribbeanLandslide occurrence through time: Landslide occurrence through timeDeveloping country burden - Nepal: Developing country burden - NepalNepal temporal trend: Nepal temporal trendThe landslide research / knowledge deficit: The landslide research / knowledge deficitFatalities plotted against the number of papers in Landslides: Fatalities plotted against the number of papers in LandslidesManaging landslides – reducing the toll: Managing landslides – reducing the tollDimensions of reducing landslide losses: Dimensions of reducing landslide losses There is no magic bullet to reducing landslide losses Multiple approaches These can be mapped in three main classesAxis 1: Prevention vs adaptation: Axis 1: Prevention vs adaptatione.g. Devil’s slide, California: e.g. Devil’s slide, CaliforniaAxis 2: Local vs regional: Axis 2: Local vs regionalAxis 3: Hazard vs vulnerablity: Axis 3: Hazard vs vulnerablityLandslide resilience in three dimensions: Landslide resilience in three dimensionsSlide 24: Hong Kong (Malone 2005)Hong Kong (Malone 2005): Hong Kong (Malone 2005)Hong Kong (Malone 2005): Hong Kong (Malone 2005)Resilience in Hong Kong: Resilience in Hong KongResilience in Nepal: Resilience in NepalEffective landslide management / resilience development: Effective landslide management / resilience development Ideal is to fill the whole spaceReality is to identify most effective approaches: Reality is to identify most effective approachesConclusions: Conclusions You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
Building resilience to landslides in mountain communities Dr_Dave Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT lite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 220 Category: Science & Tech.. License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 12, 2011 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description Seminar to the Durham University Institute of Hazard, Risk and Resilience in October 2011 Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Building resilience to landslides in mountain communities: Building resilience to landslides in mountain communities Dave Petley Wilson Professor of Hazard and Risk Director, Institute of Hazard, Risk and Resilience http://blogs.agu.org/landslideblog/Schedule: Schedule Introduction – why landslides matter The imbalanced geographic distribution of landslides worldwide – the burden carried by developing countries The developing country landslide knowledge-deficit Ways to manage and mitigate landslide impacts The Hong Kong experience Ways forward for developing countriesVideos: VideosGlobal landslide distribution 2004 - 2010: Global landslide distribution 2004 - 2010East Asia: East AsiaSouth Asia: South AsiaSE. Asia: SE. AsiaCentral America and Caribbean: Central America and CaribbeanLandslide occurrence through time: Landslide occurrence through timeDeveloping country burden - Nepal: Developing country burden - NepalNepal temporal trend: Nepal temporal trendThe landslide research / knowledge deficit: The landslide research / knowledge deficitFatalities plotted against the number of papers in Landslides: Fatalities plotted against the number of papers in LandslidesManaging landslides – reducing the toll: Managing landslides – reducing the tollDimensions of reducing landslide losses: Dimensions of reducing landslide losses There is no magic bullet to reducing landslide losses Multiple approaches These can be mapped in three main classesAxis 1: Prevention vs adaptation: Axis 1: Prevention vs adaptatione.g. Devil’s slide, California: e.g. Devil’s slide, CaliforniaAxis 2: Local vs regional: Axis 2: Local vs regionalAxis 3: Hazard vs vulnerablity: Axis 3: Hazard vs vulnerablityLandslide resilience in three dimensions: Landslide resilience in three dimensionsSlide 24: Hong Kong (Malone 2005)Hong Kong (Malone 2005): Hong Kong (Malone 2005)Hong Kong (Malone 2005): Hong Kong (Malone 2005)Resilience in Hong Kong: Resilience in Hong KongResilience in Nepal: Resilience in NepalEffective landslide management / resilience development: Effective landslide management / resilience development Ideal is to fill the whole spaceReality is to identify most effective approaches: Reality is to identify most effective approachesConclusions: Conclusions