Reproduction and Behavior in Captive Idaho and Columbia Basin Pygmy Rabbits: Reproduction and Behavior in Captive Idaho and Columbia Basin Pygmy Rabbits
Becky Elias, Rod Sayler,
Lisa Shipley
Washington State University
Slide2: Washington State University
Oregon Zoo
Northwest Trek Animal Park
Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife
Distribution of Pygmy Rabbits : Distribution of Pygmy Rabbits
Background: Background Smallest rabbit in North America
Sagebrush foragers
Dig their own burrow
Columbia Basin (CB) pygmy rabbits listed as endangered
Background: Background Decline of the Columbia Basin pygmy rabbit linked to:
Loss and fragmentation of deep soil sagebrush-steppe habitat
Predation
Disease
Cattle grazing
Inbreeding depression
Timeline: Timeline 1995 – Recovery plan adopted for Columbia Basin (CB) pygmy rabbits
2001 – Population crash results in an emergency action plan and an emergency listing as endangered. Oregon Zoo (OZ) develops captive breeding protocol using Idaho (ID) pygmy rabbits, and remaining CB rabbits are brought into captivity
2002 – Captive breeding of CB pygmy rabbits begins at OZ, Washington State University (WSU), and Northwest Trek (NWT)
2003 – CB pygmy rabbits achieve federal listing as endangered. Beginning of intercross pairings between CB and ID pygmy rabbits
Outline: Outline Breeding behavior
Reproductive success
Nest building
Gestation, birth, and lactation
Weights & Diet
Mortality & survival
Management implications
Breeding: Breeding Wilde (1978) and Fisher (1979)
Breed mid-February to mid-May
Induced ovulators
Gestation period of 39 days
Up to three litters a year
Average litter size of 6 kits
No evidence on kits in burrows; hide at base of sagebrush plants
Diet: Diet 2001 – 2002: Lab Diet (high fiber) /Bunny Basics (timothy hay mix)
2004 (at WSU only): Purina breeder’s diet (high protein)
Breeding Pens: Breeding Pens
Large breeding pen: Large breeding pen
Data Collection: Data Collection Breeding & Maternal Behaviors
Digital video recorder
Bullet cameras and day/night cameras
Pens open for ~ three days
Recorded chasing, copulation, nest-building, birth, and lactation
Reproductive Success
Female counted as pregnant when she built a natal nest
All kits found, no matter what age, used for reproductive success
Results: Results
Breeding Behavior: Breeding Behavior Male or female initiated chases
Lasted seconds to several minutes
Copulation while chasing or female stopped and allowed male to mount
Brief copulation
Breeding Behavior: Breeding Behavior
Reproductive Success of Females: Reproductive Success of Females ID significantly higher than CB on all categories
Reproductive Success of Males: Reproductive Success of Males ID significantly higher than CB on all except siring litters (small sample size?)
Reproductive Success: Reproductive Success ID and Cross significantly higher than CB
Why is CB reproduction low?: Why is CB reproduction low? Problem with males, females, or both?
Males: problem with copulation?
Females: physiological - ovulation, behavior – aggression before successful copulation?
Hybrid studies
Possible Answers: Possible Answers Captivity
Problems breeding in captivity
Behavior
Sending/receiving proper behavioral cues
Weights
Underweight animals do not produce effectively
CB males have produced better since the introduction of the higher protein diet
Potential Inbreeding Depression
Decreased mating activity
Longer time before first litter
Increased litter failure
Low sperm count/failed ovulation
Gestation, Birth, and Lactation: Gestation, Birth, and Lactation
Nest Building: Nest Building 13 days post-conception
Dig separate burrow; 16.5 – 35.5 cm
Use hay to make nest
Pluck fur from abdomen and line nest shortly before birth
Gestation: Gestation Gestation period
CB: 22.6 days (n=2) ID: 24.0 days (n=9) p=0.03
Cause of difference
CB litters born premature
Genetic drift & non-adaptive variation; adaptive variation; inbreeding depression
Birth: Birth 2 morning, 4 afternoon, 3 night
Female plucked fur from her abdomen, cleaning, and opening burrow
At burrow entrance
14.8 minutes
Covers burrow entrance
Kits: Kits Eyes closed
Little fur
Gray to black skin
Pink bellies
~15 grams
Lactation: Lactation Open once or twice a day to nurse
Kits come to the surface to nurse, with female sitting at the burrow entrance
10.6 minutes
Recovers burrow
Night (6pm-11pm)
Morning (5am-9am)
Lactation: Lactation
No apparent correlation between number of nursings per day and litter size, time of year, or health of litter
Slide28: Emerge 15 days after birth
Female doesn’t cover burrow
Sporadic nursing for several weeks
CB: 3.7 kits Cross: 4.1 kits ID: 3.5 kits
2 – 6 kits/ litter
Max litters/year:
3 in small pens, 4 in our large pen
Breeding Season: Breeding Season
CB: March 5th and May 8th
ID: *March 1st and May 25th Cross: February 21st and May 23rd Earliest & Latest successful copulation
Kit Mortality: Kit Mortality
Adult Mortality: Adult Mortality
Kit Weights: Kit Weights
Adult Weights: Adult Weights CB males and females same weight as ID before breeding season
CB males (-32g) and females (-24g) lost weight. ID males (+11g) and females (+27g) gained weight
New data: both males and females fed the higher protein diet, gained weight (19g for males, and 17g for females)
Large pen weights: Large pen weights At 26 weeks (near adult weight), animals in the large pen weigh much more than animals in the small pens
Males
Large pen: 523g
Small pen: 424g
Females
Large pen: 590g
Small pen: 431g
Captive Population Growth: first 3 years: Captive Population Growth: first 3 years Growth rate of the CB population was 1.2 during the first 3 years of the study
Projected population: 60 CB rabbits in 5 years of captive breeding
10.4% chance of population increasing to 100 and 0.1% chance of crashing to 5
Adult Survival: Adult Survival 2001: 88%
2002: 56%
2003: 63%
2004: 43%
All years: 63%
Kit Survival: Kit Survival 2001: 80%
2002: 47%
2003: 59%
2004: 23%
All years: 52%
Conclusions: Conclusions Inbreeding
Low reproductive performance
Health problems
Diet
Animals weigh more on a high protein diet
Possibly better reproduction
Population growth
Mediocre at best – long-term viability questionable
Success in any given year is unpredictable
Management Implications: Management Implications NO Columbia Basin rabbits have been found in the wild since 2001 – may be extinct
Must control disease
Explore reproductive limitations and potential
Increase genetic diversity
Intercross rabbits to maintain unique CB alleles
QUESTIONS?: QUESTIONS?