Presentation Transcript
Slide1 : Case Studies of Midwestern Thundersnow Events Christopher E. Halcomb To satisfy the degree requirements for Master of Science in Atmospheric Science University of Missouri-Columbia
November 13, 2001
Introduction : Introduction Thundersnow (TS) characteristics
Typically occurs in meso- bands
Form of elevated convection
Moist, stable boundary layer (Curran & Pearson 1971)
Low CAPE values (< 200 J kg-1)
Duration of TS observations are often short
However, sustained TS heavy snow totals
Thanksgiving Week 2000 – Buffalo, NY
19-20 January 1995 – Columbia, MO
25 February 1979 – Cape Girardeau, MO
Introduction (cont…) : Introduction (cont…) In theory, byproduct of …
Upright Instability - Positive MUCAPE (Moore et al. 1998)
Gravitational instability
decreases with height
Convective instability (CI)
e decreases with height
Conditional symmetric instability (CSI)
In moist region (RH 80%)
e surfaces more upright than Mg surfaces (PSI)
es surfaces more upright than Mg surfaces (CSI)
Negative equivalent potential vorticity (EPV) in an otherwise stable environment
Purpose, Objectives, and Statements of Thesis : Purpose, Objectives, and Statements of Thesis Purpose
To determine when and where TS occurs most often
To examine thermodynamic and dynamic characteristics of individual TS events
Main objective
To improve the accuracy of TS forecasting
Statements of Thesis
TS normally occurs in two locations
NW of surface cyclone
Due to CI in cyclonically-sheared environment
NE of surface cyclone
Due to CSI in anticyclonically-sheared environment
Methodology for Climatology : Methodology for Climatology Based on CD-ROM of surface data (SA) from 1961-1990
Reports of TS extracted with C program
Characterized by
Location
State
Actual count
Normalized according to the land area of the average state
Region
Relative to cyclone center (Digital Atmosphere)
Distance
Direction
Time of occurrence
Month
Time of day
Intensity, TMPF, DWPF, SLP, winds
Synoptic setting
Digital Atmosphere
Assoc. w/ cyclone
Lake-effect
Upslope
Orographic
Offshore cyclone
Undetermined cyclone location
Misc.
What is an event? : What is an event? A single observation of TS
If more that one for a given time frame
No more than 6 hours between multiple reports at a given station
No more than 6 hours between reports at multiple, ‘nearby’ stations
Distance between stations observing TS not more than 1100 km
Halfway point of meso- scale
To be associated as Type 1 event
Within cloud shield/cyclone flow around cyclone
Not an isolated precipitation report
Clearly identifiable cyclone center
Methodology for Case Studies : Methodology for Case Studies 4 Cases examined
5 December 1999 – Wichita, KS
9 December 1999 – Lubbock, TX
11 March 2000 – St. Louis, MO
19 April 2000 – Ellsworth AFB, SD
Analyses performed using GEMPAK (PCGRIDDS used for 5 December event)
Surface analyses (METAR)
Mandatory level analyses (RUC initial fields)
Dynamics & Thermodynamics (RUC initial fields)
Methodology for Case Studies(cont…) : Methodology for Case Studies (cont…) Thermodynamics (stability)
Cross section overlays of e, Mg, and RH (Moore & Lambert 1993)
Alternative method also compared (Schultz & Schumacher 1999)
3-D EPV (McCann 1995)
Mg not part of equation
Any cross section line can be used Dynamics (forcing)
Q vectors
S-component to assess synoptic-scale forcing
N-component to assess frontal-scale forcing
Storm-relative moisture transport
Isentropic maps
Tropopause/PV maps
Petterssen surface frontogenesis - cross sections
Results of Climatology : Results of Climatology 375 TS events discovered for the period of 1961-1990
Preferences
Regional
Basin and Range
Central Plains
Mid-Atlantic Region to New England
Temporal
March and April peak
Jet stream interaction
Afternoon and evening hours
No reason identified Classification
Most TS associated with cyclone
NW/NE quadrants
360 km from center
Some Type 1 events may be lake-enhanced
Great Lake and Great Salt Lake both contribute to Type 2
5 December 1999 : 5 December 1999 TS observed at KIAB, KICT at 0600 UTC
Cloud-to-ground lightning strikes
Bands of heavy precip indicated on radar imagery
Synoptic setting
West of surface cyclone (1009 hPa)
Slight east-west tilt with height
Cyclonic flow regime
Under “strong” divergence axis
Occluded characteristics aloft
Tropopause/PV anomaly to the south
Slide25 : 300-hPa Heights and Isotachs
Slide26 : 300-hPa Divergence
Slide29 : Convergence of Qn
Dashed areas = Convergence
Slide30 : Convergence of Qs
5 December 1999 Conclusions : 5 December 1999 Conclusions Upright instability present
Inferred from 850-700-hPa LI <0
Released lower to middle level QG frontogenesis
700 hPa trowal co-located with precip.
Upper tropospheric influences
Trop/PV anomaly decreased static stability
Qs field suggests presence of ducted gravity wave
Divergence axis at 300 hPa
9 December 1999 : 9 December 1999 TSSN & TSIP observed at KLBB
90-minute duration
7 inches of snow/sleet in 6 hours
Banded precipitation structure on radar
Synoptic setting
Northwest of surface cyclone (1009 hPa)
Cyclonic flow regime and west-to east tilt
Occluded structure aloft
Tropopause/PV anomaly to south
Slide34 : 19991209 0900 UTC
9 December 1999Conclusions : 9 December 1999 Conclusions TS occurred as convective instability was released by 750 hPa frontogenesis over LBB in trowal airstream
Additional vertical enhancement by nearby trop/PV anomaly and gravity wave
Little difference in EPV3 plots
11 March 2000 : 11 March 2000 TS observed at KSTL and much of metro area
Unconfirmed reports as far south as KCGI
Cloud-to-ground lightning strikes observed
Banded precipitation structure
Northwest of open wave surface cyclone that was occluded aloft
Nearly zonal flow regime above 500 hPa ahead of short wave
Slight west-east tilt (nearly stacked)
Tropopause/PV anomaly over N. Arkansas
11 March 2000Conclusions : 11 March 2000 Conclusions TS occurred in the presence of weak symmetric stability due to 700 hPa frontogenesis within the trowal
However, there could be unresolved CSI
Prominent divergence axis over E. MO
Trop/PV anomaly and ducted gravity wave further enhanced UVV
EPV3 plots very similar
19 April 2000 : 19 April 2000 TS reported at KRCA
Up to 30” (75 cm) acc. in Black Hills
Precip/snowfall records established
NW of intense, occluded sfc cyclone
System stacked at the lower levels
Cyclonic shear
Temperature gradient lessened
550 hPa Trop/PV anomaly to southeast
19 April 2000Conclusions : 19 April 2000 Conclusions TS occurred in region of WSS due to 700 hPa frontogenesis in strong easterly trowal airstream
Orographic influences possible
Prominent divergence axis at 300 hPa
Trop/PV/gravity wave influences
Enhanced upward motion
Decreased static stability
Differences observed between EPV3 fields, but diagnosis at KRCA not affected
Case Studies Overall Impressions : Case Studies Overall Impressions Each event in NW sector of cyclone
Trowal airstream/frontogenesis are most important forcing mechanisms
Q fields show that these mechanisms occur as a result of synoptic-scale forcing (Qs > Qn)
Effects of trop/PV anomalies
Enhance UVV & decrease static stability
Create trowal as flow becomes more meridional in attempt to conserve PV (Hoskins et al. 1985)
Gravity waves may also act to increase UVV
Stability may be less important that forcing and vertical velocities in production of TS (Schultz 2000)
Evaluation of the Statement of Thesis : Evaluation of the Statement of Thesis Statements of Thesis
TS normally occurs in two locations
NW of surface cyclone
Due to CI in cyclonically-sheared environment
NE of surface cyclone
Due to CSI in anticyclonically-sheared environment
Evaluation of the Statement of Thesis (cont…) : Evaluation of the Statement of Thesis (cont…) Evaluation
None of the known TS events that season were NE of sfc cyclone couldn’t test
2 of 4 events in NW quadrant exhibited upright instability
2 exhibited weak symmetric stability
When a system becomes stacked
Vertical shear/lapse rates decrease
Stability increases
Therefore, fine line between unstable and symmetrically stable environments
NW quadrant hypothesis partially true, although oversimplified
Catch the
buzz on authorSTREAM
Copyright © 2002-2008 authorSTREAM. All rights reserved.