logging in or signing up DukeTalk Dennison Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 27 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: December 28, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript The Other Kind of Networking:Social Networks on the Web: The Other Kind of Networking: Social Networks on the Web Dr. Jennifer Golbeck University of Maryland, College Park March 20, 2006What is a Social Network: What is a Social Network People and their connections to other peopleWeb-Based Social Networks (WBSNs): Web-Based Social Networks (WBSNs) Social Networking on the Web Websites that allow users to maintain profiles, lists of friendsCriteria: Criteria It is accessible over the web with a web browser. Users must explicitly state their relationship with other people qua stating a relationship. Relationships must be visible and browsable by other users in the system. The website or other web-based framework must have explicit built-in support for users making these connections to other people. Numbers : Numbers 141 Social Networks >200,000,000 user accounts Top Five 1. My Space 56,000,000 2. Adult Friend Finder 21,000,000 3. Friendster 21,000,000 4. Tickle 20,000,000 5. Black Planet 17,000,000 Types / Categories: Types / Categories Blogging Business Dating Pets Photos Religious Social/EntertainmentRelationships in WBSNs: Relationships in WBSNs Users can say things about the types of relationships they have 60 networks provide some relationship annotation feature Free-text (e.g. testimonials) Fixed options (e.g. Lived Together, Worked Together, From and organization or team, Took a course together, From a summer/study abroad program, Went to school together, Traveled together, In my family, Through a friend, Through Facebook, Met randomly, We hooked up, We dated, I don't even know this person.) Numerical (e.g. trust, coolness, etc)Growth Patterns: Growth Patterns Networks Grow in recognizable patterns Exponential Linear Logarithmic Public WBSNs: FOAF: Public WBSNs: FOAF Friend of a Friend (FOAF): a vocabulary in OWL for sharing personal and social network information on the Semantic Web Over 10,000,000 FOAF profiles from 8 social networksSocial Networks as Graphs: Social Networks as Graphs (i.e. the math)Building the Graph: Building the Graph Each person is a node Each relationship between people is an edge E.g. Alice knows Bob Alice BobGraph Properties: Graph Properties Edges can be directed or undirected Graphs will have cycles Alice Chuck BobGraph Properties: Graph Properties Centrality Degree Betweenness Closeness Eigenvector centrality Clustering Coefficient (connectance)Small Worlds: Small Worlds Watts & Strogatz Small World networks have short average path length and high clustering coefficients Social Networks are almost always small world networksMaking Small World Networks: Making Small World Networks Short Average path length Like what we find in random graphs High connectance Like what we find in lattices or other regular graphs Combining Network Features: Combining Network Features Start with lattice and randomly rewire p edgesEffects of Rewiring: Effects of Rewiring p 0 1 1 0 Avg. Shortest Path Length Connectance Normalized valueComputing with Social Networks: Computing with Social Networks Trust: Trust An Example Close To My Heart Given a network with trust ratings, we can infer how much two people that don’t know each other may trust one anotherInferring Trust: Inferring Trust The Goal: Select two individuals - the source (node A) and sink (node C) - and recommend to the source how much to trust the sink. A B C tAB tBC tACUsing Computations: Using Computations More email: TrustMail Recommender Systems: FilmTrust Browsing Support: SocialBrowsingFilmTrust: FilmTrust http://trust.mindswap.org/FilmTrust (Slides)SocialBrowsing: SocialBrowsingFuture Directions : Future Directions What happens next in the social network movement?Slide42: (back)TrustMail: TrustMailAlgorithms for Inferring Trust: Algorithms for Inferring Trust Two similar algorithms for inferring trust, based on trust values Binary “Continuous” Basic structure Source polls neighbors for trust value of sink Source computes the weighted average of these values to come up with an inferred trust rating When polled, neighbors return either their direct rating for the sink, or they apply the algorithm themselves to compute a value and return that Complexity O(V+E) - essentially BFSEmail Filtering: Email Filtering Boykin and Roychowdhury (2004) use social networks derived from email folders to classify messages as spam or not spam 50% of messages can be classified You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
DukeTalk Dennison Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 27 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: December 28, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript The Other Kind of Networking:Social Networks on the Web: The Other Kind of Networking: Social Networks on the Web Dr. Jennifer Golbeck University of Maryland, College Park March 20, 2006What is a Social Network: What is a Social Network People and their connections to other peopleWeb-Based Social Networks (WBSNs): Web-Based Social Networks (WBSNs) Social Networking on the Web Websites that allow users to maintain profiles, lists of friendsCriteria: Criteria It is accessible over the web with a web browser. Users must explicitly state their relationship with other people qua stating a relationship. Relationships must be visible and browsable by other users in the system. The website or other web-based framework must have explicit built-in support for users making these connections to other people. Numbers : Numbers 141 Social Networks >200,000,000 user accounts Top Five 1. My Space 56,000,000 2. Adult Friend Finder 21,000,000 3. Friendster 21,000,000 4. Tickle 20,000,000 5. Black Planet 17,000,000 Types / Categories: Types / Categories Blogging Business Dating Pets Photos Religious Social/EntertainmentRelationships in WBSNs: Relationships in WBSNs Users can say things about the types of relationships they have 60 networks provide some relationship annotation feature Free-text (e.g. testimonials) Fixed options (e.g. Lived Together, Worked Together, From and organization or team, Took a course together, From a summer/study abroad program, Went to school together, Traveled together, In my family, Through a friend, Through Facebook, Met randomly, We hooked up, We dated, I don't even know this person.) Numerical (e.g. trust, coolness, etc)Growth Patterns: Growth Patterns Networks Grow in recognizable patterns Exponential Linear Logarithmic Public WBSNs: FOAF: Public WBSNs: FOAF Friend of a Friend (FOAF): a vocabulary in OWL for sharing personal and social network information on the Semantic Web Over 10,000,000 FOAF profiles from 8 social networksSocial Networks as Graphs: Social Networks as Graphs (i.e. the math)Building the Graph: Building the Graph Each person is a node Each relationship between people is an edge E.g. Alice knows Bob Alice BobGraph Properties: Graph Properties Edges can be directed or undirected Graphs will have cycles Alice Chuck BobGraph Properties: Graph Properties Centrality Degree Betweenness Closeness Eigenvector centrality Clustering Coefficient (connectance)Small Worlds: Small Worlds Watts & Strogatz Small World networks have short average path length and high clustering coefficients Social Networks are almost always small world networksMaking Small World Networks: Making Small World Networks Short Average path length Like what we find in random graphs High connectance Like what we find in lattices or other regular graphs Combining Network Features: Combining Network Features Start with lattice and randomly rewire p edgesEffects of Rewiring: Effects of Rewiring p 0 1 1 0 Avg. Shortest Path Length Connectance Normalized valueComputing with Social Networks: Computing with Social Networks Trust: Trust An Example Close To My Heart Given a network with trust ratings, we can infer how much two people that don’t know each other may trust one anotherInferring Trust: Inferring Trust The Goal: Select two individuals - the source (node A) and sink (node C) - and recommend to the source how much to trust the sink. A B C tAB tBC tACUsing Computations: Using Computations More email: TrustMail Recommender Systems: FilmTrust Browsing Support: SocialBrowsingFilmTrust: FilmTrust http://trust.mindswap.org/FilmTrust (Slides)SocialBrowsing: SocialBrowsingFuture Directions : Future Directions What happens next in the social network movement?Slide42: (back)TrustMail: TrustMailAlgorithms for Inferring Trust: Algorithms for Inferring Trust Two similar algorithms for inferring trust, based on trust values Binary “Continuous” Basic structure Source polls neighbors for trust value of sink Source computes the weighted average of these values to come up with an inferred trust rating When polled, neighbors return either their direct rating for the sink, or they apply the algorithm themselves to compute a value and return that Complexity O(V+E) - essentially BFSEmail Filtering: Email Filtering Boykin and Roychowdhury (2004) use social networks derived from email folders to classify messages as spam or not spam 50% of messages can be classified