Presentation Transcript
The Impact of Cell phones in Kenya : The Impact of Cell phones in Kenya Isaac M. Mbiti
Southern Methodist University
Cell phone Growth : Cell phone Growth Rapid growth in cell phone usage in SSA
Number of cell phone users grew from about 7.5 Million in 1999 to almost 77 million in 2004. (ITU)
Average annual increase of 58% over that period
Mobile Phone vs. Fixed Lines in Kenya : Mobile Phone vs. Fixed Lines in Kenya Mobile Fixed Line
Mobile Growth in Kenya : Mobile Growth in Kenya The rapid growth in cell phone subscribers continued
45% growth from 6.48 Million in June 2006 to 9.30 million in June 2007
Fixed line subscription has actually decrease from 320,000 in 2001 to approx 290,000 in 2006
Mobile Companies in Kenya : Mobile Companies in Kenya 3 Main Providers
Safaricom (GSM)- largest operator
Celtel (GSM)
Telkom Kenya (CDMA network)- new service rolled out in the past year
Population density and Network Coverage : Population density and Network Coverage 80% of Kenya’s population is covered by the network
96% of Uganda’s population is covered
50% of Tanzania’s Population is covered Source: GSM Association
Slide7 : Population density and Network Coverage Across Africa Source: GSM Association
Slide8 : Success: Network Coverage Vs. Night lights data GIS work by Adam Storeygard
Factors Associated With The Rapid Growth of Mobile Phones : Factors Associated With The Rapid Growth of Mobile Phones According to Vodafone (2005) some of the main factors are:
Lower installation costs. (up to 6x lower)
Use of appropriate business model
Use of pre-paid model
Rollout requirements (in some cases)
Uganda, S. Africa, Ghana have specific requirements for rolling out services to rural and low income areas
Low provision of fixed lines
Economic Research on the Impact of Mobile Phones : Economic Research on the Impact of Mobile Phones Small literature on the effects of mobile phones
Effects of cell phones on economic growth
Effects on cell phones on price dispersion
Aker (2007), grain markets in Niger
Jensen (2007), fish markets in Kerala, India
Reductions due a reduction in search costs
Outline of TalkOther Effects of Mobile Phones : Outline of Talk Other Effects of Mobile Phones Politics
Entrepreneurs and Small businesses
Job Search
Banking and Remittances
Politics : Politics Campaigning:
Used to organize and rally supporters
Nefarious activities:
Rumor spreading e.g. “Raila Odinga in Jail”
Hate SMS (text messages) e.g." Eradicate the “foreigners” from our land ”
Peace efforts:
Safaricom sent out mass SMS to all subscribers urging them to refrain from violence.
Entrepreneurship : Entrepreneurship Selling Airtime:
Buying wholesale prepaid airtime cards for resale
Buying and loading phone with a large amount of airtime and re-selling it (Arunga and Kahora, 2007)
Informal businesses that charge cell phone batteries.
Mainly use car batteries and solar panels
Community phones
Business : Business Anecdotes suggest cell phones have enhanced the productivity of business
Arunga and Kahora (2007) investigate the effect of cell phones on businesses in different sectors.
Businesses : Businesses Matatu (minibus):
Owners better able to manage fleet. Esp. when drivers had phones.
Enabled better monitoring and management
Quick response to crises e.g. breakdowns, bribing police
Restaurant owner:
Cell phone allowed owner to order supplies of fish by phone saving on travel costs.
Owner reports that pre cell phone profit margins were 20-35% vs. 47-60% post cell phone.
Repairmen and casual Laborers : Repairmen and casual Laborers Pre-cell phone electricians, plumbers etc would wait at hardware stores
Casual laborers would loiter outside a factory all day in hope of work
Cell phone allows them to distribute their phone number and enables them to be “on call”
Plumber interviewed by Arunga and Kahora (2007) reports that his business grew by 50% due to cell phones
Cell phones reduce search costs in labor mkt
Need a Painter? : Need a Painter?
Impacts on Mobile phones in Small Business : Impacts on Mobile phones in Small Business Samuel et al (2005) reports that prior to acquiring a mobile phone 27% of business in Egypt and 15% in S. Africa had no access to a telephone
Their survey data from Egypt and S. Africa shows that between 60-70% of businesses felt that mobile phones:
Increases revenues and profits
Reduced travel time and costs
Mobiles and Banking : Mobiles and Banking “the challenge is not getting the unbanked to the Bank but getting the Bank to the unbanked” Brian Richardson CEO- Wizzit
Overview of Banking Sector in Kenya : Overview of Banking Sector in Kenya FSD 2006 survey shows:
38% of respondents did not use any type of banking service
35% used informal services e.g. ROSCA’s
26% used formal institutions.
Reasons for not Banking : Reasons for not Banking The FSD (2006) survey reported some of the major reasons that people for not having a bank account:
Cost
23% stated they could not afford a bank account
CBK (2007) survey shows for banks with national coverage
Avg. cost of operating a checking account was about $17/ mo
Avg. cost of operating a savings account was about $8/ mo
Avg. min balance on savings account was about $15 / mo
Reasons for not Banking : Reasons for not Banking The FSD (2006) survey reported some of the major reasons that people for not having a bank account:
Convenience:
There are 44 banks with 443 bank branches, and about 600 ATM’s in Kenya
Approx 45% of these located in Nairobi alone
68% reported that the nearest bank was very far away.
20% reported the nearest trading center was very far
27% reported that nearest high school was very far
Mobiles and Banking : Mobiles and Banking “the challenge is not getting the unbanked to the Bank but getting the Bank to the unbanked” Brian Richardson CEO- Wizzit
How could this be achieved?
Focus on the effects of a mobile money transfer service in Kenya: M-Pesa
Slide24 : M-pesa is a service of Safaricom
Provides very simple banking services to mobile customers on Safaricom network.
Uses:
Deposit Money
Withdraw Money
Transfer Money
Buy Safaricom airtime
Charged on a per transaction basis.
No interest earned on deposits.
M-Pesa : M-Pesa Free to register
No minimum balance is required
Max. account balance is about $700
Maximum daily transaction value is $1000
Transaction cost : Transaction cost No charge to deposit money
$0.3 to withdraw money
$2.50 to send $ 100 to a non user
$1.10 to send $100 to a user
$5.70 to send $500 (max transfer) to non user
Adoption of M-Pesa : Adoption of M-Pesa Adoption rate has exceeded expectations
According to Vaughn (2007) In the first 3 months:
111,000 registrations
450 service points (compared to 443 banks, 600 ATM's and 350 western union outlets)
Approx $6 million transferred person to person. (avg transfer about $45)
According to Safaricom (2007), by the end of November:
1.1 Million registered
Almost 1,400 service points (agents)
Cumulative total $87 Million had been transferred
$24 Million transferred in November alone
Why has the adoption been phenomenal? : Why has the adoption been phenomenal? Predominant use of M-Pesa has been in person to person transfers. (domestic remittances)
Especially for migrants to urban areas
FSD survey shows that 16% of respondents had sent money and the same percentage had received money domestically
Pre M-Pesa Remittance Delivery Methods : Pre M-Pesa Remittance Delivery Methods
M-Pesa and Remittance : M-Pesa and Remittance Ethnographic work by (Morawcynzski 2008) respondents reported the following advantages of M-Pesa
Cheaper
Safer / more reliable
Quicker
More coverage- (lots of M-pesa agents)
Costs of Other Money Transfer Services : Costs of Other Money Transfer Services To send $100 it costs about:
$15 via western union
$6 via postal money order
$12 via Moneygram
$2-3 via Akamba bus (0-10kg parcel)
$20 wire transfer
Compared with:
$2.50 via M-pesa
Sources: Kabbucho et al 2003, internet
Commercial uses of M-pesa : Commercial uses of M-pesa Vaughn (2007) reports that M-pesa is being used by companies to pay workers esp. casual laborers. (e.g. Safaricom)
Transportation sector has adopted this heavily.
Allows managers to send money to drives in case of breakdown.
Williams and Torma (2007) report that M-pesa is being widely adopted in procurement of goods.
Rather than cash on delivery, it is now M-pesa on delivery
Other uses of M-pesa : Other uses of M-pesa Deposits
Vaughn (2007) shows that many users are using M-Pesa to store money safely
Personal safety
Bank too far
Bank closed before M-Pesa shop
Morawczynski (2008) found that some respondents put money in different accounts to minimize risk of losing money in event of a bank collapse
Other uses of M-Pesa : Other uses of M-Pesa Purchasing Airtime:
Users can purchase airtime at any time.
Morawczynski found that users in Kibera were fond of this as they didn’t not have to leave their homes at night to get airtime.
During first week of post-election violence there was a shortage of airtime due to logistical disruptions. Those with money in M-pesa accounts were the only ones with uninterrupted access to airtime.
Reported Drawbacks : Reported Drawbacks Morawczynski (2008) shows:
Users found that the system could be slow during peak text messaging times
One user didn’t use it because she wanted to send goods rather than money
Her relatives were in debt and any money sent would go to debtors
The Future of M-Pesa : The Future of M-Pesa International transfers
Testing is currently underway for UK Kenya
Linking M-Pesa to banks
Linking M-Pesa to companies (e.g. utilities)
Research Questions : Research Questions What is the effect of M-pesa on the previously unbanked?
What is the effect on rural receiving community?
What is the effect of M-Pesa on banking sector?
Transfer services?
What is the effect on the telecommunication sector?
Main Competitor and new entrants?
Concluding Remarks : Concluding Remarks “I think it’s time that we recognized that for the majority of the world’s population, and for the foreseeable future, the cell phone is the computer”
Paul Mason, BBC News 2007
Remitting Airtime?/ Airtime as currency? : Remitting Airtime?/ Airtime as currency? Prior to introduction of M-Pesa there was anecdotal evidence of people using airtime balance transfer system:
To make purchases
To remit funds to rural areas
Limitations of this:
For balance transfers/purchases: who bears the burden of the taxes? (taxes on airtime are about 28%)
Catch the
buzz on authorSTREAM
Copyright © 2002-2008 authorSTREAM. All rights reserved.