logging in or signing up Calo Cuthbert Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 213 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (1) Dislike it (0) Added: April 13, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide1: International Commodity Agreements Revisited Muriel Calo Global Development & Environment Institute Tufts University, USA Prices, Support & Supply Mgt Chapeco, Brazil January 2005Overview: Overview Rationale, trends Objectives Explaining the collapse A way forward Temperate-tropical crops New developments in the political arenaRationale for Commodity Agreements: Rationale for Commodity Agreements In agriculture, free market forces do not lead to workable equilibrium This is underscored by recent developments in tropical export crop markets world coffee and cocoa markets completely liberalized with collapse of the agreements prices have fallen to less than 20 percent of former levelsInstrument depends on ObjectiveBuffer stock vs. Quota: Instrument depends on Objective Buffer stock vs. Quota Price support Export quotas Require a national stock mechanism Production quotas Price stabilization Buffer stocks The Collapse of the Agreements: The Collapse of the Agreements COCOA, COFFEE & TIN : High prices in the 70s new producers increased production chronic surplus in the 80s Stock overflowed Stock lacked flexible mechanism for price & quota adjustment Cocoa Agreement lacked export or production quotas Withdrawal of funds by US and key producersThe Collapse of the Agreements: The Collapse of the Agreements RUBBER: Failed to stabilize or support prices Stock had automatic price adjustment mechanism, preventing bankruptcy But Agreement lacked export or production quotas SUGAR: Failed to stabilize or support prices Protectionist policies in US & EU depressed & destabilized world pricesWhy the Agreements FailedTechnical Reasons: Why the Agreements Failed Technical Reasons Lack of funding because major countries declined to cooperate Led to collapse of buffer stocks Absence of supply controls Export quotas & stocks inadequate in the face of structural oversupply The failure of South-South cooperation Free riding by producing countries hampered agreement between countries and reinforced conflicts on quota distribution & funding Domestic farm policies of developed countries With tropical-temperate crops like sugar, developed countries could also be free ridersWhy the Agreements FailedUnderlying Constitutional Problem: Why the Agreements Failed Underlying Constitutional Problem Restrictive GATT Framework: De facto veto power by a handful of unwilling developed countries 5 year terms required near-constant negotiation Divisive commodity-by-commodity approach failed to balance benefits between countries Led to: Inadequate instruments for enforcement of price bands Obstructed negotiations & withdrawal of funding at willWhy the Agreements FailedUnderlying Constitutional Problem: Why the Agreements Failed Underlying Constitutional Problem UNCTAD & the 1974 Integrated Program for Commodities: Provided for coordinated negotiations on 18 commodities & Common Fund Resolution accepted without dissent, but western countries reneged on their commitments US and EU used their participation in the Agreements as “damage control”, obstructing and diluting decisionsMeeting Technical Constraints: : Meeting Technical Constraints: Match instruments to objectives Buffer stocks alone will not support prices (Cocoa, rubber…) Control structural oversupply with production quotas Flexible price adjustment mechanism (Tin…) Flexible market share adjustment mechanism New entrants, new trends in demand (Coffee…) Enforcement mechanisms Supportive national policies (Sugar…)Meeting Political Constraints: Financial Independence: Meeting Political Constraints: Financial Independence Design self-financing arrangements for tropical crops (export tax) Consider coordinated negotiations on several crops at once Build a Coalition of southern countries, farmer organizations, NGOs and willing developed country governments Target traders and processors as negotiating partners Use the Coalition as a platform to discuss wider trade reforms Meeting Political Constraints:Bargaining Power: Meeting Political Constraints: Bargaining Power Enforce cooperation by developed country gov’ts by leveraging: Intellectual property Foreign investment Anti-terrorism Environment Other issues important to developed countries Enforce compliance by large corporations via: NGO advocacy, public pressure, consumer boycott campaignsBalancing Efficiency & Equity: Balancing Efficiency & Equity Stimulating Efficiency: Establish a system of gradual quota redistribution from high to low-cost countries Make domestic quotas tradable within countriesBalancing Efficiency & Equity: Balancing Efficiency & Equity Ensuring Equity: Subdivide domestic quota trade by geographical area or size of landholding Reserve funds to purchase part of the quotas for free reallocation to farmers Redistribute quotas to low-cost countries based on agreed formula The Case of Temperate-tropical crops: The Case of Temperate-tropical crops Restoring international stocks for food crops is justified solely on food security basis (ie. maize) Supply controls would require: 1. Action in WTO to: Restrict dumping & direct payments Restrict market power of large traders & processors 2. Coordination between temperate and tropical countries to limit supply expansionInternational Momentum Is Building: International Momentum Is Building Oxfam Initiative (2002) ICO Coffee Quality Improvement Scheme (2002) WTO Initiative: Kenya, Tanzania & Uganda’s Proposal to the Committee on Trade & Dvlpt (2003) UNCTAD Initiative: new research on tropical commodities (2004) US Entry into ICO: an opportunity or a constraint?A flexible self-financing scheme: A flexible self-financing scheme Individual production quotas tradable in national quota exchanges Uniform export tax Transition period tax revenue is used for buying out stocks, part of current production, and part of the quotas Post-transition export tax is reduced residual tax is used for buying quotas for free redistribution to farmers and low-cost countries (according to pre-agreed formula)Self-financing scheme for doubling producer prices for coffee over a 5-year period: Self-financing scheme for doubling producer prices for coffee over a 5-year periodSugar and Tin AgreementsUsed export quotas & stocks: Sugar and Tin Agreements Used export quotas & stocks SUGAR Operated in very difficult market due to protectionist policies in EU and US: Expansion of EU sugar dumping on world markets US imposition of import quotas and support of domestic producers 4th agreement (1977) failed to stabilize prices under these conditions: EU and US actions undermined the impact of a reduction in export quotas Agreement unable to defend its world price, lapsing in 1984 PROBLEM: Depressed and destabilized world prices due to protectionist policies TIN 6th agreement collapsed in 1985 due to Failure to achieve sufficient participation (US & Bolivia) New low-cost production in Brazil Large stock inherited from 5th agreement Underfinancing caused by US refusal to renew membership Failure to respond to major changes in supply & demand PROBLEM: Lacked flexible price adjustment mechanism Underfinanced Coffee Agreement Used export quotas & stocks: Coffee Agreement Used export quotas & stocks ICAs Attempts to control market have swung between cartel arrangements and ICAs since 1962 Successfully moderated price decline until 1989 4th Agreement lapsed in 1989 due to withdrawal of funds by supporting countries, and disagreement on distribution of quotas between producers (Central America vs Brazil) PROBLEM: Withdrawal of funds Expiration of 5 year term Rigid quota system hampered adjustment to new trends in demand Post-1990 Cartel schemes in 1993 and 2000 suffered from: Inadequate scope Weakened gov’t control over stocks and exports Lack of enforcement mechanism Non-cooperation of several producers (ie. Mexico) PROBLEM: desperate need for foreign exchange lack of storage facilities or financing capacity to buy/hold stocks South-South tensions. Basic Steps to Designing a Scheme: Basic Steps to Designing a Scheme Set reference price Instruments for enforcing price band (stocks, quotas) Financial instrument (export tax) Formula for determining quota shares between and within countries Flexibility mechanisms for price & quota adjustment Enforcement mechanism You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
Calo Cuthbert Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 213 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (1) Dislike it (0) Added: April 13, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide1: International Commodity Agreements Revisited Muriel Calo Global Development & Environment Institute Tufts University, USA Prices, Support & Supply Mgt Chapeco, Brazil January 2005Overview: Overview Rationale, trends Objectives Explaining the collapse A way forward Temperate-tropical crops New developments in the political arenaRationale for Commodity Agreements: Rationale for Commodity Agreements In agriculture, free market forces do not lead to workable equilibrium This is underscored by recent developments in tropical export crop markets world coffee and cocoa markets completely liberalized with collapse of the agreements prices have fallen to less than 20 percent of former levelsInstrument depends on ObjectiveBuffer stock vs. Quota: Instrument depends on Objective Buffer stock vs. Quota Price support Export quotas Require a national stock mechanism Production quotas Price stabilization Buffer stocks The Collapse of the Agreements: The Collapse of the Agreements COCOA, COFFEE & TIN : High prices in the 70s new producers increased production chronic surplus in the 80s Stock overflowed Stock lacked flexible mechanism for price & quota adjustment Cocoa Agreement lacked export or production quotas Withdrawal of funds by US and key producersThe Collapse of the Agreements: The Collapse of the Agreements RUBBER: Failed to stabilize or support prices Stock had automatic price adjustment mechanism, preventing bankruptcy But Agreement lacked export or production quotas SUGAR: Failed to stabilize or support prices Protectionist policies in US & EU depressed & destabilized world pricesWhy the Agreements FailedTechnical Reasons: Why the Agreements Failed Technical Reasons Lack of funding because major countries declined to cooperate Led to collapse of buffer stocks Absence of supply controls Export quotas & stocks inadequate in the face of structural oversupply The failure of South-South cooperation Free riding by producing countries hampered agreement between countries and reinforced conflicts on quota distribution & funding Domestic farm policies of developed countries With tropical-temperate crops like sugar, developed countries could also be free ridersWhy the Agreements FailedUnderlying Constitutional Problem: Why the Agreements Failed Underlying Constitutional Problem Restrictive GATT Framework: De facto veto power by a handful of unwilling developed countries 5 year terms required near-constant negotiation Divisive commodity-by-commodity approach failed to balance benefits between countries Led to: Inadequate instruments for enforcement of price bands Obstructed negotiations & withdrawal of funding at willWhy the Agreements FailedUnderlying Constitutional Problem: Why the Agreements Failed Underlying Constitutional Problem UNCTAD & the 1974 Integrated Program for Commodities: Provided for coordinated negotiations on 18 commodities & Common Fund Resolution accepted without dissent, but western countries reneged on their commitments US and EU used their participation in the Agreements as “damage control”, obstructing and diluting decisionsMeeting Technical Constraints: : Meeting Technical Constraints: Match instruments to objectives Buffer stocks alone will not support prices (Cocoa, rubber…) Control structural oversupply with production quotas Flexible price adjustment mechanism (Tin…) Flexible market share adjustment mechanism New entrants, new trends in demand (Coffee…) Enforcement mechanisms Supportive national policies (Sugar…)Meeting Political Constraints: Financial Independence: Meeting Political Constraints: Financial Independence Design self-financing arrangements for tropical crops (export tax) Consider coordinated negotiations on several crops at once Build a Coalition of southern countries, farmer organizations, NGOs and willing developed country governments Target traders and processors as negotiating partners Use the Coalition as a platform to discuss wider trade reforms Meeting Political Constraints:Bargaining Power: Meeting Political Constraints: Bargaining Power Enforce cooperation by developed country gov’ts by leveraging: Intellectual property Foreign investment Anti-terrorism Environment Other issues important to developed countries Enforce compliance by large corporations via: NGO advocacy, public pressure, consumer boycott campaignsBalancing Efficiency & Equity: Balancing Efficiency & Equity Stimulating Efficiency: Establish a system of gradual quota redistribution from high to low-cost countries Make domestic quotas tradable within countriesBalancing Efficiency & Equity: Balancing Efficiency & Equity Ensuring Equity: Subdivide domestic quota trade by geographical area or size of landholding Reserve funds to purchase part of the quotas for free reallocation to farmers Redistribute quotas to low-cost countries based on agreed formula The Case of Temperate-tropical crops: The Case of Temperate-tropical crops Restoring international stocks for food crops is justified solely on food security basis (ie. maize) Supply controls would require: 1. Action in WTO to: Restrict dumping & direct payments Restrict market power of large traders & processors 2. Coordination between temperate and tropical countries to limit supply expansionInternational Momentum Is Building: International Momentum Is Building Oxfam Initiative (2002) ICO Coffee Quality Improvement Scheme (2002) WTO Initiative: Kenya, Tanzania & Uganda’s Proposal to the Committee on Trade & Dvlpt (2003) UNCTAD Initiative: new research on tropical commodities (2004) US Entry into ICO: an opportunity or a constraint?A flexible self-financing scheme: A flexible self-financing scheme Individual production quotas tradable in national quota exchanges Uniform export tax Transition period tax revenue is used for buying out stocks, part of current production, and part of the quotas Post-transition export tax is reduced residual tax is used for buying quotas for free redistribution to farmers and low-cost countries (according to pre-agreed formula)Self-financing scheme for doubling producer prices for coffee over a 5-year period: Self-financing scheme for doubling producer prices for coffee over a 5-year periodSugar and Tin AgreementsUsed export quotas & stocks: Sugar and Tin Agreements Used export quotas & stocks SUGAR Operated in very difficult market due to protectionist policies in EU and US: Expansion of EU sugar dumping on world markets US imposition of import quotas and support of domestic producers 4th agreement (1977) failed to stabilize prices under these conditions: EU and US actions undermined the impact of a reduction in export quotas Agreement unable to defend its world price, lapsing in 1984 PROBLEM: Depressed and destabilized world prices due to protectionist policies TIN 6th agreement collapsed in 1985 due to Failure to achieve sufficient participation (US & Bolivia) New low-cost production in Brazil Large stock inherited from 5th agreement Underfinancing caused by US refusal to renew membership Failure to respond to major changes in supply & demand PROBLEM: Lacked flexible price adjustment mechanism Underfinanced Coffee Agreement Used export quotas & stocks: Coffee Agreement Used export quotas & stocks ICAs Attempts to control market have swung between cartel arrangements and ICAs since 1962 Successfully moderated price decline until 1989 4th Agreement lapsed in 1989 due to withdrawal of funds by supporting countries, and disagreement on distribution of quotas between producers (Central America vs Brazil) PROBLEM: Withdrawal of funds Expiration of 5 year term Rigid quota system hampered adjustment to new trends in demand Post-1990 Cartel schemes in 1993 and 2000 suffered from: Inadequate scope Weakened gov’t control over stocks and exports Lack of enforcement mechanism Non-cooperation of several producers (ie. Mexico) PROBLEM: desperate need for foreign exchange lack of storage facilities or financing capacity to buy/hold stocks South-South tensions. Basic Steps to Designing a Scheme: Basic Steps to Designing a Scheme Set reference price Instruments for enforcing price band (stocks, quotas) Financial instrument (export tax) Formula for determining quota shares between and within countries Flexibility mechanisms for price & quota adjustment Enforcement mechanism