Presentation Transcript
Slide1: International Commodity Agreements Revisited Muriel Calo
Global Development & Environment Institute
Tufts University, USA Prices, Support & Supply Mgt
Chapeco, Brazil
January 2005
Overview: Overview Rationale, trends
Objectives
Explaining the collapse
A way forward
Temperate-tropical crops
New developments in the political arena
Rationale for Commodity Agreements: Rationale for Commodity Agreements In agriculture, free market forces do not lead to workable equilibrium
This is underscored by recent developments in tropical export crop markets
world coffee and cocoa markets completely liberalized with collapse of the agreements
prices have fallen to less than 20 percent of former levels
Instrument depends on ObjectiveBuffer stock vs. Quota: Instrument depends on Objective Buffer stock vs. Quota Price support
Export quotas
Require a national stock mechanism
Production quotas
Price stabilization
Buffer stocks
The Collapse of the Agreements: The Collapse of the Agreements COCOA, COFFEE & TIN :
High prices in the 70s new producers increased production chronic surplus in the 80s
Stock overflowed
Stock lacked flexible mechanism for price & quota adjustment
Cocoa Agreement lacked export or production quotas
Withdrawal of funds by US and key producers
The Collapse of the Agreements: The Collapse of the Agreements RUBBER:
Failed to stabilize or support prices
Stock had automatic price adjustment mechanism, preventing bankruptcy
But Agreement lacked export or production quotas
SUGAR:
Failed to stabilize or support prices
Protectionist policies in US & EU depressed & destabilized world prices
Why the Agreements FailedTechnical Reasons: Why the Agreements Failed Technical Reasons Lack of funding because major countries declined to cooperate
Led to collapse of buffer stocks
Absence of supply controls
Export quotas & stocks inadequate in the face of structural oversupply
The failure of South-South cooperation
Free riding by producing countries hampered agreement between countries and reinforced conflicts on quota distribution & funding
Domestic farm policies of developed countries
With tropical-temperate crops like sugar, developed countries could also be free riders
Why the Agreements FailedUnderlying Constitutional Problem: Why the Agreements Failed Underlying Constitutional Problem
Restrictive GATT Framework:
De facto veto power by a handful of unwilling developed countries
5 year terms required near-constant negotiation
Divisive commodity-by-commodity approach failed to balance benefits between countries
Led to:
Inadequate instruments for enforcement of price bands
Obstructed negotiations & withdrawal of funding at will
Why the Agreements FailedUnderlying Constitutional Problem: Why the Agreements Failed Underlying Constitutional Problem
UNCTAD & the 1974 Integrated Program for Commodities:
Provided for coordinated negotiations on 18 commodities & Common Fund
Resolution accepted without dissent, but western countries reneged on their commitments
US and EU used their participation in the Agreements as “damage control”, obstructing and diluting decisions
Meeting Technical Constraints: : Meeting Technical Constraints: Match instruments to objectives
Buffer stocks alone will not support prices (Cocoa, rubber…)
Control structural oversupply with production quotas
Flexible price adjustment mechanism (Tin…)
Flexible market share adjustment mechanism
New entrants, new trends in demand (Coffee…)
Enforcement mechanisms
Supportive national policies (Sugar…)
Meeting Political Constraints: Financial Independence: Meeting Political Constraints: Financial Independence Design self-financing arrangements for tropical crops (export tax)
Consider coordinated negotiations on several crops at once
Build a Coalition of southern countries, farmer organizations, NGOs and willing developed country governments
Target traders and processors as negotiating partners
Use the Coalition as a platform to discuss wider trade reforms
Meeting Political Constraints:Bargaining Power: Meeting Political Constraints: Bargaining Power Enforce cooperation by developed country gov’ts by leveraging:
Intellectual property
Foreign investment
Anti-terrorism
Environment
Other issues important to developed countries
Enforce compliance by large corporations via:
NGO advocacy, public pressure, consumer boycott campaigns
Balancing Efficiency & Equity: Balancing Efficiency & Equity Stimulating Efficiency:
Establish a system of gradual quota redistribution from high to low-cost countries
Make domestic quotas tradable within countries
Balancing Efficiency & Equity: Balancing Efficiency & Equity Ensuring Equity:
Subdivide domestic quota trade by geographical area or size of landholding
Reserve funds to purchase part of the quotas for free reallocation to farmers
Redistribute quotas to low-cost countries based on agreed formula
The Case of Temperate-tropical crops: The Case of Temperate-tropical crops Restoring international stocks for food crops is justified solely on food security basis (ie. maize)
Supply controls would require:
1. Action in WTO to:
Restrict dumping & direct payments
Restrict market power of large traders & processors
2. Coordination between temperate and tropical countries to limit supply expansion
International Momentum Is Building: International Momentum Is Building Oxfam Initiative (2002)
ICO Coffee Quality Improvement Scheme (2002)
WTO Initiative: Kenya, Tanzania & Uganda’s Proposal to the Committee on Trade & Dvlpt (2003)
UNCTAD Initiative: new research on tropical commodities (2004)
US Entry into ICO: an opportunity or a constraint?
A flexible self-financing scheme: A flexible self-financing scheme Individual production quotas
tradable in national quota exchanges
Uniform export tax
Transition period
tax revenue is used for buying out stocks, part of current production, and part of the quotas
Post-transition
export tax is reduced
residual tax is used for buying quotas for free redistribution to farmers and low-cost countries (according to pre-agreed formula)
Self-financing scheme for doubling producer prices for coffee over a 5-year period: Self-financing scheme for doubling producer prices for coffee over a 5-year period
Sugar and Tin AgreementsUsed export quotas & stocks: Sugar and Tin Agreements Used export quotas & stocks SUGAR
Operated in very difficult market due to protectionist policies in EU and US:
Expansion of EU sugar dumping on world markets
US imposition of import quotas and support of domestic producers
4th agreement (1977) failed to stabilize prices under these conditions:
EU and US actions undermined the impact of a reduction in export quotas
Agreement unable to defend its world price, lapsing in 1984
PROBLEM:
Depressed and destabilized world prices due to protectionist policies TIN
6th agreement collapsed in 1985 due to
Failure to achieve sufficient participation (US & Bolivia)
New low-cost production in Brazil
Large stock inherited from 5th agreement
Underfinancing caused by US refusal to renew membership
Failure to respond to major changes in supply & demand
PROBLEM:
Lacked flexible price adjustment mechanism
Underfinanced
Coffee Agreement Used export quotas & stocks: Coffee Agreement Used export quotas & stocks ICAs
Attempts to control market have swung between cartel arrangements and ICAs since 1962
Successfully moderated price decline until 1989
4th Agreement lapsed in 1989 due to withdrawal of funds by supporting countries, and disagreement on distribution of quotas between producers (Central America vs Brazil)
PROBLEM:
Withdrawal of funds
Expiration of 5 year term
Rigid quota system hampered adjustment to new trends in demand
Post-1990
Cartel schemes in 1993 and 2000 suffered from:
Inadequate scope
Weakened gov’t control over stocks and exports
Lack of enforcement mechanism
Non-cooperation of several producers (ie. Mexico)
PROBLEM:
desperate need for foreign exchange
lack of storage facilities or financing capacity to buy/hold stocks
South-South tensions.
Basic Steps to Designing a Scheme: Basic Steps to Designing a Scheme Set reference price
Instruments for enforcing price band (stocks, quotas)
Financial instrument (export tax)
Formula for determining quota shares between and within countries
Flexibility mechanisms for price & quota adjustment
Enforcement mechanism