logging in or signing up lse mr20 Crystal Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 36 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: December 28, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Science Policy and Social Justice: Science Policy and Social Justice Professor Michael Crow Chair, Center for Science, Policy, and Outcomes and Executive Vice Provost, Columbia University March 2002 Science is a Principal Driver of Change: Science is a Principal Driver of Change Social change Internet Environmental change Climate National security change Weapons of mass destruction Health and Medical change Biotechnology Science- based economyFoundations of Science Policy: Foundations of Science Policy Republic of Science Market Failure Model Unpredictability Democratic Science Sociotechnical Outcomes Model Prediction with Uncertainty Current EnhancedSlide4: Inputs Processes Products Outcomes Current (Linear) Approach to Science Policy Input-driven process assumes: All societal outcomes will be positive Linear model of innovation and societal benefitLinking Scientific Research and Science Policy to Societal Outcomes: Linking Scientific Research and Science Policy to Societal Outcomes Genetically-Modified Organisms (GMOs)Perspectives: Perspectives How does the science that we do affect the social choices we make? How do the S&T programs we implement affect the distribution and equity of outcomes?Global Climate Change and Societal Outcomes: Global Climate Change and Societal Outcomes Slide8: How does the science that we do affect the social choices we make?Slide9: Geophysical Systems Research Social Systems Research Biological Systems Research Technological Systems Research Components of Environmental ScienceSlide10: Fundamental Research Predictive Models Policy Decisions Societal Benefits Standard (Linear) Model of Science for Decision Making Slide11: Local land use affects climate at every scale Source: C. Ziegler, NOAASlide12: Major Disasters 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 60 40 20 0 > 100 killed > 1% of population affected >1% nat’l GDP Source: OFDA/CRED International Disaster Data BaseSlide13: Hurricane Mitch, October 22 - November 5, 1998 Human Impacts Deaths >10,000 People affected 1.7 million Source: NOAA/OGP Economic Impacts Country Losses % of GDP Nicaragua US$2 billion 50% Honduras US$4 billion 100% Source: The Economist 11/14/98; slide courtesy of R. Pielke Jr.Slide14: Source: Pielke Jr., Kline, and Sarewitz, 2000.Slide15: Not Control But Navigation Because the pathway to sustainability cannot be charted in advance, it will have to be navigated through trial and error and conscious experimentation. National Research Council, 2000 Our Common Journey How does the science that we do affect the social choices we make?: How does the science that we do affect the social choices we make? Science and Technology Policy in the States: Economic Development for Whom?: Science and Technology Policy in the States: Economic Development for Whom? Slide18: How do the S&T programs we implement affect the distribution and equity of outcomes? New “Laboratories of Democracy”: New “Laboratories of Democracy” University-Industry “Centers of Excellence” Research Parks Business Incubators Technology Development Centers Manufacturing Assistance Programs Slide20: Stimulate science and technology Build new businesses Create wealth in the state Societal Benefits The Linear Theory of Innovation: State Government Version Income transfer from middle income taxpayer to the wealthyWhy are problems of employment and distribution of income S&T Issues?: Why are problems of employment and distribution of income S&T Issues? S&T and social issues critically interdependent Technology strategy drives government spending and its social outcomes Linear thinking in technology policy is linear thinking in social outcomes A Case Study: Georgia: A Case Study: Georgia Top five in spending for S&T Programs FY2000: $51 million Universities highly effective technology transfer sites Strong Hi-Tech base in Metro Atlanta But…Booming and Busting at the Same Time The Georgia Economy is Hot: The Georgia Economy is Hot Unemployment rate below 5% since 1995 State revenues doubled between 1990 and 1999 New corporations per month doubled between 1985 and 1999 15,000 jobs unfilled right nowBut…Booming AND Busting: But…Booming AND Busting Median income for: Whites in Metro Atlanta: $51,000 African-Americans: $18,000 Rural Georgia families: $27,000 Atlanta among leaders in creating new millionaires and in percentages of children below poverty level Average SAT’s: Georgia Tech: 1319 Georgia high schools: 874Slide25: Georgia has the worst high school graduation rate in the nationIs Georgia S&T Policy a “Success”?: Is Georgia S&T Policy a “Success”? Yes: Creates jobs, creates wealth, does a lot with a little No: Exacerbates wage gaps, promotes uneven development, contributes to suburban rim sprawl Running in Place, Running Ahead:: Running in Place, Running Ahead: The median wage earner has advanced only 8% in income growth during past two decades The Dual Agenda: Science and Social Equity: The Dual Agenda: Science and Social Equity The Challenge: to develop science and technology policy that reaches the significant proportion of each state’s working poor who have been bypassed by the economic boom... Slide29: How do the S&T programs we implement affect the distribution and equity of outcomes? Science Policy Research Needs: Science Policy Research Needs New science policy indicators New tools of evaluation New vision for what science can bring to our future Education of scientists and politicians Replace Cold War paradigm as outmodedA New Science Policy Framework: Outcome-Driven : A New Science Policy Framework: Outcome-Driven Integrated Informed Self-correcting Recognizes and responds to the inextricable links between science and technology and societal evolutionSlide32: Conduct of Science Economic Outcomes S&T Outcomes Societal Outcomes POLICY New industries Tech transfer Knowledge transfer Partnerships New social structures Education New skills New institutions Linking Scientific Research to Societal Outcomes: New ModelsFoundations of Science Policy: Foundations of Science Policy Republic of Science Market Failure Model Unpredictability Democratic Science Sociotechnical Outcomes Model Prediction with Uncertainty Current EnhancedMorality and Science: Morality and Science What is the collective good that we want inquiry to promote? Philip Kitcher, Professor of Philosophy in Science, Truth and Democracy, to be published, 2001 You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
lse mr20 Crystal Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 36 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: December 28, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Science Policy and Social Justice: Science Policy and Social Justice Professor Michael Crow Chair, Center for Science, Policy, and Outcomes and Executive Vice Provost, Columbia University March 2002 Science is a Principal Driver of Change: Science is a Principal Driver of Change Social change Internet Environmental change Climate National security change Weapons of mass destruction Health and Medical change Biotechnology Science- based economyFoundations of Science Policy: Foundations of Science Policy Republic of Science Market Failure Model Unpredictability Democratic Science Sociotechnical Outcomes Model Prediction with Uncertainty Current EnhancedSlide4: Inputs Processes Products Outcomes Current (Linear) Approach to Science Policy Input-driven process assumes: All societal outcomes will be positive Linear model of innovation and societal benefitLinking Scientific Research and Science Policy to Societal Outcomes: Linking Scientific Research and Science Policy to Societal Outcomes Genetically-Modified Organisms (GMOs)Perspectives: Perspectives How does the science that we do affect the social choices we make? How do the S&T programs we implement affect the distribution and equity of outcomes?Global Climate Change and Societal Outcomes: Global Climate Change and Societal Outcomes Slide8: How does the science that we do affect the social choices we make?Slide9: Geophysical Systems Research Social Systems Research Biological Systems Research Technological Systems Research Components of Environmental ScienceSlide10: Fundamental Research Predictive Models Policy Decisions Societal Benefits Standard (Linear) Model of Science for Decision Making Slide11: Local land use affects climate at every scale Source: C. Ziegler, NOAASlide12: Major Disasters 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 60 40 20 0 > 100 killed > 1% of population affected >1% nat’l GDP Source: OFDA/CRED International Disaster Data BaseSlide13: Hurricane Mitch, October 22 - November 5, 1998 Human Impacts Deaths >10,000 People affected 1.7 million Source: NOAA/OGP Economic Impacts Country Losses % of GDP Nicaragua US$2 billion 50% Honduras US$4 billion 100% Source: The Economist 11/14/98; slide courtesy of R. Pielke Jr.Slide14: Source: Pielke Jr., Kline, and Sarewitz, 2000.Slide15: Not Control But Navigation Because the pathway to sustainability cannot be charted in advance, it will have to be navigated through trial and error and conscious experimentation. National Research Council, 2000 Our Common Journey How does the science that we do affect the social choices we make?: How does the science that we do affect the social choices we make? Science and Technology Policy in the States: Economic Development for Whom?: Science and Technology Policy in the States: Economic Development for Whom? Slide18: How do the S&T programs we implement affect the distribution and equity of outcomes? New “Laboratories of Democracy”: New “Laboratories of Democracy” University-Industry “Centers of Excellence” Research Parks Business Incubators Technology Development Centers Manufacturing Assistance Programs Slide20: Stimulate science and technology Build new businesses Create wealth in the state Societal Benefits The Linear Theory of Innovation: State Government Version Income transfer from middle income taxpayer to the wealthyWhy are problems of employment and distribution of income S&T Issues?: Why are problems of employment and distribution of income S&T Issues? S&T and social issues critically interdependent Technology strategy drives government spending and its social outcomes Linear thinking in technology policy is linear thinking in social outcomes A Case Study: Georgia: A Case Study: Georgia Top five in spending for S&T Programs FY2000: $51 million Universities highly effective technology transfer sites Strong Hi-Tech base in Metro Atlanta But…Booming and Busting at the Same Time The Georgia Economy is Hot: The Georgia Economy is Hot Unemployment rate below 5% since 1995 State revenues doubled between 1990 and 1999 New corporations per month doubled between 1985 and 1999 15,000 jobs unfilled right nowBut…Booming AND Busting: But…Booming AND Busting Median income for: Whites in Metro Atlanta: $51,000 African-Americans: $18,000 Rural Georgia families: $27,000 Atlanta among leaders in creating new millionaires and in percentages of children below poverty level Average SAT’s: Georgia Tech: 1319 Georgia high schools: 874Slide25: Georgia has the worst high school graduation rate in the nationIs Georgia S&T Policy a “Success”?: Is Georgia S&T Policy a “Success”? Yes: Creates jobs, creates wealth, does a lot with a little No: Exacerbates wage gaps, promotes uneven development, contributes to suburban rim sprawl Running in Place, Running Ahead:: Running in Place, Running Ahead: The median wage earner has advanced only 8% in income growth during past two decades The Dual Agenda: Science and Social Equity: The Dual Agenda: Science and Social Equity The Challenge: to develop science and technology policy that reaches the significant proportion of each state’s working poor who have been bypassed by the economic boom... Slide29: How do the S&T programs we implement affect the distribution and equity of outcomes? Science Policy Research Needs: Science Policy Research Needs New science policy indicators New tools of evaluation New vision for what science can bring to our future Education of scientists and politicians Replace Cold War paradigm as outmodedA New Science Policy Framework: Outcome-Driven : A New Science Policy Framework: Outcome-Driven Integrated Informed Self-correcting Recognizes and responds to the inextricable links between science and technology and societal evolutionSlide32: Conduct of Science Economic Outcomes S&T Outcomes Societal Outcomes POLICY New industries Tech transfer Knowledge transfer Partnerships New social structures Education New skills New institutions Linking Scientific Research to Societal Outcomes: New ModelsFoundations of Science Policy: Foundations of Science Policy Republic of Science Market Failure Model Unpredictability Democratic Science Sociotechnical Outcomes Model Prediction with Uncertainty Current EnhancedMorality and Science: Morality and Science What is the collective good that we want inquiry to promote? Philip Kitcher, Professor of Philosophy in Science, Truth and Democracy, to be published, 2001