week4 1

Word Structure: 

Word Structure Part 1

The Structure of Words: Morphology: 

The Structure of Words: Morphology Fundamental concepts in how words are composed out of smaller parts The nature of these parts The nature of the rules that combine these parts into larger units What it might mean to be a word

Basic Units: 

Basic Units Remember that in phonology the basic distinctive units of sound are phonemes In morphology, the basic unit is the morpheme Basic definition: A morpheme is a minimal unit of sound and meaning (this can be modified in various ways; see below)

Some Examples: 

Some Examples Many words can be divided into smaller parts, where the parts also occur in other words: dogs walking blackens player-hater dog-s walk-ing black-en-s play-er hat-er Compare: cat-s; runn-ing; dark-en-s; eat-er (note: in some cases there are spelling changes when we add morphemes; ignore this)

Parts, cont.: 

Parts, cont. The smaller parts occur consistently with many words: -s: forms the plural consistently -ing: forms a noun from a verb -en: forms a verb meaning ‘become ADJ’ from an adjective ADJ -er: forms an agentive nominal from a verb, a person or thing who does that activity

Connections between Sound and Meaning: 

Connections between Sound and Meaning Remember that a phoneme sometimes has more than one sound form, while being the same abstract unit: /p/ with [p] and [ph] A related thing happens with morphemes as well In order to see this, we have to look at slightly more complex cases

Morphemes and Allomorphs: 

Morphemes and Allomorphs Sometimes it is said that a morpheme has more than one allomorph This happens when the same meaning unit like [past] for past tense or [pl] for plural has more than one sound form Past: one feature [past] kick / kick-ed leave / lef-t hit / hit-Ø The last example shows a case in which the phonological form of the morpheme past is zero, i.e. it is not pronounced

Allomorphy, cont.: 

Allomorphy, cont. In the case of phonology, we said that the different allophones of a phoneme are part of the same phoneme, but are found in particular contexts The same is true of the different allomorphs of a morpheme Which allomorph of a morpheme is found depends on its context; in this case, what it is attached to: Example: consider [pl] for English plural. It normally has the pronunciation –s (i.e. /z/), but moose / moose-Ø ox / ox-en

An Additional Point: Regular and Irregular: 

An Additional Point: Regular and Irregular In the examples above, the different allomorphs have a distinct status. One of them is regular. This is the default form that appears in e.g. Wug-test environments For other allomorphs, speakers simply have to memorize the fact that the allomorph is what it is Example: It cannot be predicted from other facts that the plural of ox is ox-en Demonstration: The regular plural is /z/; consider one box, two box-es. Or a Wug-test scenario Default cases like the /z/ plural are called regular. Allomorphs that have to be memorized are called irregular.

Further Distinctions: Freedom, etc.: 

Further Distinctions: Freedom, etc. Our working definition of morpheme was ‘minimal unit of sound and meaning’ A further division among morphemes involves whether they can occur on their own or not: No: -s in dog-s; -ed in kick-ed; cran- in cran-berry Yes: dog, kick, berry

Some Definitions: 

Some Definitions Bound Morphemes: Those that cannot appear on their own Free Morphemes: Those that can appear on their own In a complex word: The root or stem is the basic or core morpheme The things added to this are the affixes Example: in dark-en the root or stem is dark, while the affix – in this case a suffix – is -en

Further points: 

Further points In some cases, works will use root and stem in slightly different ways Affixes are divided into prefixes and suffixes depending on whether they occur before or after the thing they attach to For the most part, prefixes and suffixes are always bound, except for isolated instances

Content and Function Words: 

Content and Function Words Content Morphemes: morphemes that have a referential function that is independent of grammatical structure; e.g. dog, kick, etc. Sometimes these are called open-class because speakers can add to this class at will Function morphemes: morphemes that are bits of syntactic structure– e.g. prepositions, or morphemes that express grammatical notions like [past] for past tense. Sometimes called closed-class because speakers cannot add to this class

Cross-Classification: 

Cross-Classification The bound/free and content/function distinctions are not the same. Some examples: Content Function Bound cran- -ed Free dog the

Non-Affixal Morphology: 

Non-Affixal Morphology In the cases above, we have seen many affixes associated with some morphological function. In other cases, there are additional changes: sing/sang goose/geese Examples of this type are not obviously affixal, as there is no (overt) added piece. Rather, the phonology of the stem/root has changed.

Some examples: 

Some examples Stem changing: Present Past Participle sing sang sung begin began begun sit sat sat come came come

Another pattern: 

Another pattern While in many cases the stem change does not co-occur with an affix, in some cases it does: Examples: break broke brok-en tell tol-d tol-d freeze froze froz-en

Use of stem changing patterns: 

Use of stem changing patterns In some languages, stem-changing is much more important than it is in e.g. English In Semitic languages, extensive use is made of different templatic patterns, that is, abstract patterns of consonants and vowels: Arabic noun plurals: kitaab ‘book’; kutub ‘books’ nafs ‘soul’; nufus ‘souls’

Internal structure of words: 

Internal structure of words Words have an internal structure that requires analysis into constituents (much like syntactic structure does) For example: Unusable contains three pieces: un-, use, -able Question: Is the order derive use-able, then add un-; or derive un-use, then add -able

Word Structure: 

Word Structure Possibilities: Structure 1 Structure 2 un use able un use able

Word Structure, cont.: 

Word Structure, cont. Consider: With –able, we create adjectives meaning ‘capable of being V-ed’, from verbs V break/break-able; kick/kick-able There is no verb un-use This is an argument that Structure 1 is correct: [un [use able]] This analysis fits well with what the word means as well: not capable of being used. Structure 2 would mean something like ‘capable of not being used’

Another example: 

Another example Consider another word: unlockable. Focus on un- Note that in addition to applying to adjectives (clear/unclear), un- applies to some verbs to give a kind of undoing or reversing meaning: do, undo zip, unzip tie, untie Note now that unlockable has two meanings

The Unlockable example: 

The Unlockable example Two meanings: Not capable of being locked Capable of being unlocked These meanings correspond to distinct structures: 1) 2) un lock able un lock able

Unlockable, cont.: 

Unlockable, cont. The second structure is one in which –able applies to the verb unlock This verb is itself created from un- and lock The meaning goes with this: ‘capable of being unlocked’ In structure 1, there is no verb unlock So the meaning is ‘not capable of being locked’

Some General Points: 

Some General Points The system for analyzing words applies in many cases that are created on the fly Complex words and their meanings are not simply stored; rather, the parts are assembled to create complex meanings Another example of the same principle applies in the process of compounding

Introduction to Compounding: 

Introduction to Compounding A compound is a complex word that is formed out of a combination of stems (as opposed to stem + affix) These function in a certain sense as ‘one word’, and have distinctive phonological patterns Examples: olive oil shop talk shoe polish truck driver

Compounding, cont.: 

Compounding, cont. An interesting property of compounds is that although they are ‘words’, they form a productive system, without limits (as far as grammar is concerned, not memory). Note also that compounds have special accentual (stress) properties: judge trial judge murder trial judge murder trial judge reporter murder trial judge reporter killer murder trial judge reporter killer catcher murder trial judge reporter killer catcher biographer …

Internal structure: 

Internal structure Like with other complex words, the internal structure of compounds is crucial There are cases of ambiguities like that with unlockable Example: obscure document shredder Person who shreds obscure documents Obscure person who shreds documents