ADRC Collaboration Across Aging and Disability Net

Choices for Independence:A National Leadership SummitADRC Collaboration Across Aging and Disability Networks:Shall We Dance?December 6, 2006: 

Choices for Independence: A National Leadership Summit ADRC Collaboration Across Aging and Disability Networks: Shall We Dance? December 6, 2006

Presented by:: 

Presented by: Charlie Carr Executive Director Northeast Independent Living Program (NILP) Rosanne DiStefano Executive Director Elder Services of the Merrimack Valley (ESMV) Sandy Tocman Senior Planning and Development Specialist Massachusetts Executive Office of Elder Affairs (EOEA)

Vision: 

Vision Create a single, coordinated system of information and access for all persons seeking long term services and supports, regardless of age, disability or income.

Initial ADRC Grant Impact: 

Initial ADRC Grant Impact Three year grant funded by AoA and CMS Years 1 & 2 piloted in the Merrimack Valley with ESMV and NILP as partners Year 3 grant expanded to the North Shore, Cape Ann and Greater Lynn regions adding 5 new partners: North Shore Elder Services Greater Lynn Senior Services SeniorCare, Inc. ILC of North Shore and Cape Ann Elder Service Plan of the North Shore (PACE program)

2006 Grant Proposal: 

2006 Grant Proposal Two year grant funded by AoA and in partnership with CMS to extend ADRC model statewide Key activities planned: Readiness assessment of ILCs and ASAPs to determine current capacity to perform functions of ADRC Identify regions for ADRC concept replication Extend to new regions

Massachusetts Approach: 

Massachusetts Approach Builds primarily upon two existing agency types in MA: Aging Service Access Points (ASAPs) /Area Agencies on As Aging (AAAs) Independent Living Centers (ILCs)

Massachusetts Approach: 

Massachusetts Approach Differs from models in other states Creates a “virtual organization” Aging and disability service and advocacy networks are equal partners MA ADRCs operate regionally

Slide8: 

Key Aspects of the Massachusetts Model Partnership between ASAPs and ILCs, yet each agency retains its own autonomy Cross-training of ASAP and ILC staff to enhance service delivery Coordination and streamlining of key functions within existing organizations “No Wrong Door” approach versus “Single Entry Point” Involvement of consumers and community stakeholders as advisors

Key Partners: ASAPs and ILCsHow are they the same?How are they different?: 

Key Partners: ASAPs and ILCs How are they the same? How are they different?

Analysis of Similarities: 

Analysis of Similarities Compatible vision and mission Both serve populations who need functional assistance Access to different arrays of services Both local non-profits with local consumer-controlled boards Various funding bases ASAPs: Older Americans Act, EOEA, Medicaid, other state/local ILCs: Title VII of Workforce Investment Act, State IL, other state/local

Similarities (Continued): 

Similarities (Continued) Use of core client-centered databases and management information systems Commitment to serve individuals in the settings and manner of their choice Commitment to divert and/or transition individuals out of institutions to home and community-based supports

Slide12: 

How Does the ADRC Provide Services? Initial Contact Streamlined!! Call, visit, or e-mail either the ASAP or ILC for information, assistance and access to long-term services and supports Staff provides home visits, advocacy, and program-specific information Most services are free: Some require financial eligibility, or request a small donation

Why Collaborate?: 

Why Collaborate? It’s the right thing to do! Increased access by consumer to broader array of options for living independently Opportunity to advocate together on legislation and policies that enhance the ability of individuals to live independently in the community Major federal initiative

Key for ADRC SuccessFirst Steps: 

Key for ADRC Success First Steps Begin ASAP / ILC dialogue early Involve senior leadership Identify “champions” Leave ASAP / ILC “hats” at the door Begin cross training and information sharing

Key for ADRC SuccessSecond Steps: 

Key for ADRC Success Second Steps Enter Memorandums of Understanding Facilitate “seamless” interagency communication Reach out to other organizations for their involvement in ADRC Invite consumer participation Create advisory group

Parting Thoughts: 

Parting Thoughts ADRCs should be tailored to local conditions Communication and trust are essential components An ADRC is not a new organization, it is a NEW RELATIONSHIP of existing organizations ADRC as the gateway to services

For more information:: 

For more information: Sandy Tocman Senior Planning & Development Specialist Executive Office of Elder Affairs One Ashburton Place, 5th Floor Boston, MA 02108 617-222-7514 TTY: 1-800-872-0166 Sandra.Tocman@state.ma.us