logging in or signing up 2005survey Charlo Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 30 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: November 05, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Library User Survey - Fall 2005: Library User Survey - Fall 2005 Background Process Survey Preliminary Results Next StepsWhy: Why Have not done a comprehensive library focused survey across all core constituencies in recent memory Assessment “And we, like MIT, will expand and redefine our culture of excellence to include assessment.” Establish benchmarks for future comparison Improve services Inform resource allocation decision making Raise Awareness How: How Project team formed Steve Gass (sponsor) Nicole Hennig Lisa Horowitz (lead) Marilyn McSweeney Sharon Stanczak Contracted with Provost’s Office of Institutional Research and IS&T’s Web Survey ServiceChallenges: Challenges Asking the right questions Actionable data Finding the “right” balance the number of questions to ask against the desire to keep the survey short Getting a significant number of core constituents to respond Faculty Graduate Students Undergraduates Post Doctorates Research and Other Academic Staff Prize$Timeline: Timeline Project begun in late July Draft survey designed and tested late September through mid-October Launched on Halloween weekend by email from Ann Two reminders sent First from Chair of the FCLS Second from Chair of the Faculty Officially closed on Dec. 1 Data Analysis BeginsThe Survey: The Survey Just over 50 Questions Many asking for more than one response Divided into thematic sections Focus on Usage & Behavior Awareness Satisfaction Importance SurveyResponse Rate: Response Rate 294 / 980 = 30% STAFFFAC 626 / 1720 = 36% STAFFOTH 453 /1125 = 40% STAFFSRS 594 / 999 = 59% STUDENT1 572 / 1078 = 53% STUDENT2 473 / 998 = 47% STUDENT3 482 / 1,018 = 47% STUDENT4 2,966 / 6,022 = 49% STUDENTG 1,373 / 3,825 = 36% STAFF 5,087 / 10,115 = 50% STUDENT 6,460 / 13,940 = 46% TOTALOpen Ended Questions: Open Ended Questions What should the Libraries 2 or 3 top priorities for the next 3 years? 3,724 responses What would you like us to know or think about that we have not already asked? 1,453 responses Would you be willing to give us feedback on future products and services? Over 1,500 respondents provided us with their email address Next Steps: Next Steps Collate data into useful packets Correlations between questions Demographic characteristics Combinations of the above Disseminate details to staff Report to community You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
2005survey Charlo Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 30 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: November 05, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Library User Survey - Fall 2005: Library User Survey - Fall 2005 Background Process Survey Preliminary Results Next StepsWhy: Why Have not done a comprehensive library focused survey across all core constituencies in recent memory Assessment “And we, like MIT, will expand and redefine our culture of excellence to include assessment.” Establish benchmarks for future comparison Improve services Inform resource allocation decision making Raise Awareness How: How Project team formed Steve Gass (sponsor) Nicole Hennig Lisa Horowitz (lead) Marilyn McSweeney Sharon Stanczak Contracted with Provost’s Office of Institutional Research and IS&T’s Web Survey ServiceChallenges: Challenges Asking the right questions Actionable data Finding the “right” balance the number of questions to ask against the desire to keep the survey short Getting a significant number of core constituents to respond Faculty Graduate Students Undergraduates Post Doctorates Research and Other Academic Staff Prize$Timeline: Timeline Project begun in late July Draft survey designed and tested late September through mid-October Launched on Halloween weekend by email from Ann Two reminders sent First from Chair of the FCLS Second from Chair of the Faculty Officially closed on Dec. 1 Data Analysis BeginsThe Survey: The Survey Just over 50 Questions Many asking for more than one response Divided into thematic sections Focus on Usage & Behavior Awareness Satisfaction Importance SurveyResponse Rate: Response Rate 294 / 980 = 30% STAFFFAC 626 / 1720 = 36% STAFFOTH 453 /1125 = 40% STAFFSRS 594 / 999 = 59% STUDENT1 572 / 1078 = 53% STUDENT2 473 / 998 = 47% STUDENT3 482 / 1,018 = 47% STUDENT4 2,966 / 6,022 = 49% STUDENTG 1,373 / 3,825 = 36% STAFF 5,087 / 10,115 = 50% STUDENT 6,460 / 13,940 = 46% TOTALOpen Ended Questions: Open Ended Questions What should the Libraries 2 or 3 top priorities for the next 3 years? 3,724 responses What would you like us to know or think about that we have not already asked? 1,453 responses Would you be willing to give us feedback on future products and services? Over 1,500 respondents provided us with their email address Next Steps: Next Steps Collate data into useful packets Correlations between questions Demographic characteristics Combinations of the above Disseminate details to staff Report to community