Title, Abstract, Background and Significance: Title, Abstract, Background and Significance Bruce Pitt
Department Environmental and
Occupational Health
University Pittsburgh Graduate
School Public Health
brucep@pitt.edu
Slide2: Survival Skills &
Ethics Program www.survival.pitt.edu Beth Fisher and Mike Zigmund
Outline, Write, and Edit: Outline, Write, and Edit
Remember tothink like a reviewer: Remember to think like a reviewer
TITLE: TITLE CONFORM:
81 characters
new - different title
competing or revised - same title
ACCURATE statement of longterm goals
INCLUDE keywords
Application PHS Grant 09/04
TITLE (FAQs): TITLE (FAQs) What if I don’t conform?
How does my title affect my assignment?
What makes a good title?
TITLE (example): TITLE (example) Physiology of the pulmonary circulation
Nitric oxide and pulmonary hypertension
Pharmacology of sodium nitrite for pulmonary hypertension in sickle cell disease
TITLE (example): TITLE (example) Host defense and lung biology
Macrophages and fungal infection of lung
Dectin-1, alveolar macrophages and Immunity Against Pneumocystis Carinii in Mice
ABSTRACT: ABSTRACT Purpose: succinctly describe entire proposal
Implications:
a) grant referral process (initial study section and institute assignments)
b) significant source of information for study section members not assigned
c) source reviewer assignment
ABSTRACT : ABSTRACT Half-page (confined to designated space)
Condensed modified version specific aims:
Essence of specific aims (exactly same wording from section A for aims)
Few sentences on health relatedness
Significance in terms of long term goals.
www.whitaker.org/sanders/html
ABSTRACT - SUGGESTIONS: ABSTRACT - SUGGESTIONS Modify specific aims (Section A) and write abstract last
Use entire space allotted and be complete
Consider impact of dispersal of abstract:
annual reports and website
readily accessed by colleagues, administrators and lay public
Slide13: Magnesium (Mg) deficiency may play an important role in pathogenesis of enhanced vascular reactivity in hypertension. The overall hypothesis to be evaluated is that Mg deficiency caused by glucose intolerance, insulin resistance or other factors in hypertensives leads to increased vasomotor tone via altered release of vasoactive cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase products of arachidonic acid and enhanced angiotensin II (AII) action. To evaluate the effects of Mg deficiency in normal subjects, we will induce the condition by administration of a low Mg diet. Vascular and adrenal sensitivity to AII, platelet aggregation and eicosanoid levels will be studied prior to and after Mg deficiency is established. Since evidence suggests Mg deficiency can modulate insulin action, the effect of this deficiency on glucose tolerance will also be studied. In another project the effect of insulin on intracellular Mg levels will be studied using a new fura 2 Mg dye technique. These studies will be performed in groups of subjects with varied blood pressure and insulin levels. Also the effects of acute intravenous and chronic oral Mg loading on the above parameters will be studied in similar subject groups. We will directly study the effect of Mg on AII, insulin and insulin like growth factor action in isolated and cultured adrenal glomerulosa cells. Concentration of Mg will be varied and signal transduction and steroidogenic effects will be evaluate. These studies will provide insight into mechamisms important to the pathogenesis of altered vascular reactivity of subjects with hypertension or hyperinsulinemia.
Slide14: Magnesium (Mg) deficiency may play an important role in pathogenesis of enhanced vascular reactivity in hypertension. The overall HYPOTHESIS to be evaluated is that Mg deficiency caused by glucose intolerance, insulin resistance or other factors in hypertensives leads to increased vasomotor tone via altered release of vasoactive cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase products of arachidonic acid and enhanced angiotensin II (AII) action.
Specific Aims: (1) Determine the effects of low Mg on vascular and adrenal sensitivity to AII ( platelet aggregation and eicosanoid levels, glucose tolerance); (2) determine the effect of insulin on intraceullar Mg levels (fura 2 Mg dye technique). These studies will be performed in groups of subjects with varied blood pressure and insulin levels; (3) determine the effect of acute i.v. and chronic oral Mg loading on the above parameters; (4) determine the signal transduction and steroidogenic effects of Mg and AII, insulin and insulin-like growth factor action in isolated and cultured adrenal glomerulosa cells.
Significance: These studies will provide insight into mechamisms important to the pathogenesis of altered vascular reactivity of subjects with hypertension or hyperinsulinemia.
ABSTRACT CHECKLIST: ABSTRACT CHECKLIST Stay within space with understandable language
State hypothesis, specific aims, significance
Importance, innovativeness
Exclude confidential, proprietary info
www.niaid.nih.gov/ncn/grants/charts/checklists.htm
B. Background & Significance: literature review
rationale for project
state of the field B. Background & Significance be selective
deal w/ contradictions
include own work
include reviewer’s work
cite sources
in text: …was effective (Jones & Smith, 1996)
in biblio: Jones R, Smith M (1996) Effect of stress
on ethical behavior, Ethics, 3: 23-47.
B. Background & Significance: literature review
rationale for project
state of the field
your proposal
innovation
contribution to field B. Background & Significance build enthusiasm
BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE - PURPOSE: BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE - PURPOSE 3 page opportunity to demonstrate scholarship by concisely
a) stating problem to be investigated and rationale for proposal
b) placing proposal within current state of knowledge – not literature review
c) summarizing potential new information to be gleaned
BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE -CONTENT: BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE -CONTENT Combination of literature citations, referral to own work and thoughtful schema cover:
rationale for proposal
state of existing knowledge
gaps that project will fill
BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE - SUGGESTIONS: BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE - SUGGESTIONS Make compelling case (importance of topic and research questions, qualifications of investigators)
Establish familiarity and authority in field
Citations (contemporary, correct)
Stress innovations, new technologies and impact on related fields of research
BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE - SUGGESTIONS: BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE - SUGGESTIONS Critical analysis of work of others – not negative but rather scholarly recognition of contributions of other scientists whose work yours builds on
Gaps in our understanding: explicitly state what information is missing and how your work will address these issues
Emphasize significance of proposal: assume all reviewers agree on importance of general problem and thus focus on impact of your research on issue in question.
General organization: General organization use headings frequently
General organization: General organization write in paragraphs
1 major idea per paragraph
topic sentences
initial paragraphs of section most important
General organization: General organization
make it easy to find key points
bold face
cross reference
some redundancy
Appearance: Appearance
Appearance: Appearance select good type face
Appearance: Appearance select good type face
good
Times Roman
Century Schoolbook
Appearance: Appearance select good type face
good avoid!
Times Roman courier
Century Schoolbook
Appearance: Appearance select good type face
good avoid!
Times Roman courier
Century Schoolbook
size > 11 pt (recommend 11.5)
Appearance: Appearance let your text
indent paragraphs
skip line between paragraphs
Background Significance - Checklist: Background Significance - Checklist Written clearly and nontechnically?
Show how research innovative
Why worth funding
How increase knowledge
Include background information
Literature reveal understanding
Gaps, discrepancies or roadblocks in field
Acknowledgements: Acknowledgements Ogden & Goldberg
Research Proposals: A Guide to Success
Miner & Griffith
Proposal Planning & Writing
many Program Officers
Slide35: staff
Beth Fischer
Michael Zigmond
Mary DiBernardo
Maureen Geary
support
University of Pittsburgh
NSF
NIH Survival Skills &
Ethics Program www.survival.pitt.edu
Sample review criteria: Sample review criteria
REFERENCES: REFERENCES Bauer DG. The “How To” Grants Manual: Successful Grantseeking Techniques for Obtaining Public and Private Grants. 3rd edition. Phoenix: Oryx Press. 1995.
Bowman JP & Branchaw BP. How to Write Proposals That Produce. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press, 1992.
Brown LG. Demystifying Grantseeking: What you Really Need to Do To Get Grants. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001.
Browning B. Grant Writing for Dummies. IDG Books Worldwide, Inc., 2001.
Burke J. I’ll Grant You That: A Step-by-Step Guide to Finding Funds, Designing Winning Projects, and Writing Powerful Grant Proposals. Portsmouth, NH: Heinman, 2000
Carlson M. Winning Grants Step By Step: Support Centers of America’s Complete Workbook for Planning, Developing, and Writing Successful Proposals. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1995.
Carter New C & Quick JA. Grantseeker’s Toolkit: A Comprehensive Guide to Finding Funding. NY: Wiley, 1998.
Coley SM & Scheinberg CA. Proposal Writing. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1990.
REFERENCES (CONT): REFERENCES (CONT) Davitz JR Davitz LL. Evaluating Research Proposals: A Guide for the Behavioral Sciences. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1996.
Ferguson J Drake-Major L Gershowitz MV. The Grantseeker’s Answerbook: Fundraising Experts Respond to the Most Commonly Asked Questions, 2nd edition. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Pubs, 1999.
Golden SL. Secrets of Successful Grantsmanship: A Guerrilla Guide to Raising Money. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1997.
Illes J. The Strategic Grant-Seeker: Conceptualizing Fundable Research in the Brain and Behavioral Sciences. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1999.
Locke LF, Spirduso W, Silverman SJ. Proposals that Work. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1993.
Miner LE & Griffith J. Proposal Planning & Writing. Phoenix: Oryx Press, 1993.
Ogden TE & Goldberg IA. Research Proposals: A Guide to Success, 3rd ed. NY: Academic Press, 2002.
REFERENCES (CONT): REFERENCES (CONT) Quick JA. Grant Seeker’s Budget Toolkit. New York: John Wiley, 2001.
Reif-Lehrer L. Grant Application Writer’s Handbook. Boston: Jones & Bartlett Publishers, 1995.
Ries JB and Leukefeld CG. The Research Funding Guidebook: Getting It, Managing It & Renewing It. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1998.
@ Websites on grants
Community of Science: www.cos.com
Foundation Center: http://fdncenter.org/grantmaker
GrantsNet: www.hhs.gov/grantsnet
The Grantsmanship Center: www.tgci.com
Internet Resources for Nonprofits: www.ai.mit.edu/people/ellens/Non/online
National Institutes of Health: www.nih.gov
National Science Foundation: www.nsf.gov
NIAID “All About Grants” Tutorial: www.niaid.nih.gov/ncn/grants
U.S. Nonprofit Gateway: www.nonprofit.gov
ScienceWise.com: www.sciencewise.com
Society of Research Administrators: www.srainternational.org