logging in or signing up Conf Linda Heine J 374 Cajetano Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 99 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: January 29, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide1: The DLA A-76 Program Linda Heine DLA Competitive Sourcing Office J-374Agenda: Agenda A-76 is Government-wide DLA’s “Report Card” Who Does What Best Practices for a Good Program The Road Ahead WE ARE DOINGOUR SHARE: WE ARE DOING OUR SHARE Completed competitions: 11 studies 4,281 FTEs Recently Announced: 8 competitions- 2,776 FTEs 4 In-house 7 Contractor $718M Net Savings No overturned decisionsSlide5: Actual Projected FAIR Act 2000 Baseline: 18,409 OMB Cumulative Goals FY 02 5 % FY 03 15 % % Completed Cumulative Additional Positions to be Announced for Study in FY 07 thru 09: Inventory Control Points DSIO, DLIS, HQ DLA % FAIR Act 2000 Positions Study Completed (Cumulative) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 Fiscal Year HQ Competitive Sourcing Office, J-374: HQ Competitive Sourcing Office, J-374 Linda Heine Program Manager Marvin Williams Program Coordinator Ron Fairley Administrative Assistant Ken McLain Program Coordinator Roger Forester Analyst BAH Consultant or awayAvailable Tools: Available Tools POA&M Templates (no, Ma! I didn’t say a bad word!) VTC Guidebook Web site http://www.dla.mil/j-8/A-76/A-76Main.html DLA Competitive Sourcing Organization: DLA Competitive Sourcing Organization 4e Official- Director, DLA Exec Director, J37 – A-76 Program Responsibilities A-76 Contracting Office – DSCC-PR Contracting Office for DAPS was DRMS Commercial Activities Program Managers: DDC – Ms Twila Gonzales DRMS – Mr. Brian Moravek DAPS – Mr. Mike Sadagursky TBDDLA Competitive Sourcing Organization (cont’d): DLA Competitive Sourcing Organization (cont’d) Independent Review Official J-308, Mr. Jeff Goldstein Administrative Appeal Authority DT, Mr. Alan Banghart* Source Selection Authority J-3, MG Proctor** Source Selection Advisory Council Chair J-37, Mr. Fred Baillie** * For depot and DRMO competitions in round 3 **For J-3 competitionsAn Effective Program: An Effective Program Requiring Activity Contracting Officer HQ Other Support Common Goals Common Priorities Teamwork Commitment Signs of a Good Program: Signs of a Good Program On schedule – all players know schedule Everyone knows his/her role Workforce integral part of the process Communication is two-way & continual Affected people are informed & assisted Decisions are not overturned Mission continues unhampered – during & afterKeys to Our Success Best Practices: Keys to Our Success Best Practices Centralized Management Heavy Emphasis on Customer Role Proactive Administrative Appeal Process Legal Support Build on Lessons Learned Top Down Commitment Bottom Up Participation Centralized Management: Centralized Management 2. 3. 4e Official, A-76 Policy and Program Office Requiring Activities – Program Offices Activities Under Study Contracting IROSlide14: Our Role: Provide Commitment from the Top Down Provide Advance Notice Request Input and Participation Customers’ Role: Input to requirements development (PWS) Serve as evaluators e.g., Source Selection Evaluation Board Inform their management and workforce Taking Care of Our CustomerSlide15: 1. Tentative Decision 30 day public review period. Competitors can appeal tentative decision during public review period AAA has 30 days to review and decide on any appeals 5. AA makes final decision DLA’s Administrative Appeal Process (AAP) After appeals are filed, agency provides redacted copies to appellants for comment (7 days)Building on Lessons Learned: Building on Lessons Learned Learning is a journey It “takes a village” Make your mistakes count Stop, think … and change Share those hard lessons What’s on the Scope: Proceed with Competitions in Progress: DDTP – DDPW – DRMS DDCT – DDAA – DDRT DDOO – DDNV Performance measures Implement the new rules Announce competitions for installation services for SDPs Schedule future competitions What’s on the Scope You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
Conf Linda Heine J 374 Cajetano Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 99 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: January 29, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide1: The DLA A-76 Program Linda Heine DLA Competitive Sourcing Office J-374Agenda: Agenda A-76 is Government-wide DLA’s “Report Card” Who Does What Best Practices for a Good Program The Road Ahead WE ARE DOINGOUR SHARE: WE ARE DOING OUR SHARE Completed competitions: 11 studies 4,281 FTEs Recently Announced: 8 competitions- 2,776 FTEs 4 In-house 7 Contractor $718M Net Savings No overturned decisionsSlide5: Actual Projected FAIR Act 2000 Baseline: 18,409 OMB Cumulative Goals FY 02 5 % FY 03 15 % % Completed Cumulative Additional Positions to be Announced for Study in FY 07 thru 09: Inventory Control Points DSIO, DLIS, HQ DLA % FAIR Act 2000 Positions Study Completed (Cumulative) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 Fiscal Year HQ Competitive Sourcing Office, J-374: HQ Competitive Sourcing Office, J-374 Linda Heine Program Manager Marvin Williams Program Coordinator Ron Fairley Administrative Assistant Ken McLain Program Coordinator Roger Forester Analyst BAH Consultant or awayAvailable Tools: Available Tools POA&M Templates (no, Ma! I didn’t say a bad word!) VTC Guidebook Web site http://www.dla.mil/j-8/A-76/A-76Main.html DLA Competitive Sourcing Organization: DLA Competitive Sourcing Organization 4e Official- Director, DLA Exec Director, J37 – A-76 Program Responsibilities A-76 Contracting Office – DSCC-PR Contracting Office for DAPS was DRMS Commercial Activities Program Managers: DDC – Ms Twila Gonzales DRMS – Mr. Brian Moravek DAPS – Mr. Mike Sadagursky TBDDLA Competitive Sourcing Organization (cont’d): DLA Competitive Sourcing Organization (cont’d) Independent Review Official J-308, Mr. Jeff Goldstein Administrative Appeal Authority DT, Mr. Alan Banghart* Source Selection Authority J-3, MG Proctor** Source Selection Advisory Council Chair J-37, Mr. Fred Baillie** * For depot and DRMO competitions in round 3 **For J-3 competitionsAn Effective Program: An Effective Program Requiring Activity Contracting Officer HQ Other Support Common Goals Common Priorities Teamwork Commitment Signs of a Good Program: Signs of a Good Program On schedule – all players know schedule Everyone knows his/her role Workforce integral part of the process Communication is two-way & continual Affected people are informed & assisted Decisions are not overturned Mission continues unhampered – during & afterKeys to Our Success Best Practices: Keys to Our Success Best Practices Centralized Management Heavy Emphasis on Customer Role Proactive Administrative Appeal Process Legal Support Build on Lessons Learned Top Down Commitment Bottom Up Participation Centralized Management: Centralized Management 2. 3. 4e Official, A-76 Policy and Program Office Requiring Activities – Program Offices Activities Under Study Contracting IROSlide14: Our Role: Provide Commitment from the Top Down Provide Advance Notice Request Input and Participation Customers’ Role: Input to requirements development (PWS) Serve as evaluators e.g., Source Selection Evaluation Board Inform their management and workforce Taking Care of Our CustomerSlide15: 1. Tentative Decision 30 day public review period. Competitors can appeal tentative decision during public review period AAA has 30 days to review and decide on any appeals 5. AA makes final decision DLA’s Administrative Appeal Process (AAP) After appeals are filed, agency provides redacted copies to appellants for comment (7 days)Building on Lessons Learned: Building on Lessons Learned Learning is a journey It “takes a village” Make your mistakes count Stop, think … and change Share those hard lessons What’s on the Scope: Proceed with Competitions in Progress: DDTP – DDPW – DRMS DDCT – DDAA – DDRT DDOO – DDNV Performance measures Implement the new rules Announce competitions for installation services for SDPs Schedule future competitions What’s on the Scope