Conf Linda Heine J 374

Uploaded from authorPOINTLite
Views:
 
Category: Entertainment
     
 

Presentation Description

No description available.

Comments

Presentation Transcript

Slide1: 

The DLA A-76 Program Linda Heine DLA Competitive Sourcing Office J-374

Agenda: 

Agenda A-76 is Government-wide DLA’s “Report Card” Who Does What Best Practices for a Good Program The Road Ahead

WE ARE DOING OUR SHARE: 

WE ARE DOING OUR SHARE Completed competitions: 11 studies 4,281 FTEs Recently Announced: 8 competitions- 2,776 FTEs 4 In-house 7 Contractor $718M Net Savings No overturned decisions

Slide5: 

Actual Projected FAIR Act 2000 Baseline: 18,409 OMB Cumulative Goals FY 02  5 % FY 03  15 % % Completed Cumulative Additional Positions to be Announced for Study in FY 07 thru 09: Inventory Control Points DSIO, DLIS, HQ DLA % FAIR Act 2000 Positions Study Completed (Cumulative) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 Fiscal Year

HQ Competitive Sourcing Office, J-374: 

HQ Competitive Sourcing Office, J-374 Linda Heine Program Manager Marvin Williams Program Coordinator Ron Fairley Administrative Assistant Ken McLain Program Coordinator Roger Forester Analyst BAH Consultant or away

Available Tools: 

Available Tools POA&M Templates (no, Ma! I didn’t say a bad word!) VTC Guidebook Web site http://www.dla.mil/j-8/A-76/A-76Main.html

DLA Competitive Sourcing Organization: 

DLA Competitive Sourcing Organization 4e Official- Director, DLA Exec Director, J37 – A-76 Program Responsibilities A-76 Contracting Office – DSCC-PR Contracting Office for DAPS was DRMS Commercial Activities Program Managers: DDC – Ms Twila Gonzales DRMS – Mr. Brian Moravek DAPS – Mr. Mike Sadagursky TBD

DLA Competitive Sourcing Organization (cont’d): 

DLA Competitive Sourcing Organization (cont’d) Independent Review Official J-308, Mr. Jeff Goldstein Administrative Appeal Authority DT, Mr. Alan Banghart* Source Selection Authority J-3, MG Proctor** Source Selection Advisory Council Chair J-37, Mr. Fred Baillie** * For depot and DRMO competitions in round 3 **For J-3 competitions

An Effective Program: 

An Effective Program Requiring Activity Contracting Officer HQ Other Support Common Goals Common Priorities Teamwork Commitment

Signs of a Good Program: 

Signs of a Good Program On schedule – all players know schedule Everyone knows his/her role Workforce  integral part of the process Communication is two-way & continual Affected people are informed & assisted Decisions are not overturned Mission continues unhampered – during & after

Keys to Our Success Best Practices: 

Keys to Our Success Best Practices Centralized Management Heavy Emphasis on Customer Role Proactive Administrative Appeal Process Legal Support Build on Lessons Learned Top Down Commitment Bottom Up Participation

Centralized Management : 

Centralized Management 2. 3. 4e Official, A-76 Policy and Program Office Requiring Activities – Program Offices Activities Under Study Contracting IRO

Slide14: 

Our Role: Provide Commitment from the Top Down Provide Advance Notice Request Input and Participation Customers’ Role: Input to requirements development (PWS) Serve as evaluators e.g., Source Selection Evaluation Board Inform their management and workforce Taking Care of Our Customer

Slide15: 

1. Tentative Decision 30 day public review period. Competitors can appeal tentative decision during public review period AAA has 30 days to review and decide on any appeals 5. AA makes final decision DLA’s Administrative Appeal Process (AAP) After appeals are filed, agency provides redacted copies to appellants for comment (7 days)

Building on Lessons Learned: 

Building on Lessons Learned Learning is a journey It “takes a village” Make your mistakes count Stop, think … and change Share those hard lessons

What’s on the Scope: 

Proceed with Competitions in Progress: DDTP – DDPW – DRMS DDCT – DDAA – DDRT DDOO – DDNV Performance measures Implement the new rules Announce competitions for installation services for SDPs Schedule future competitions What’s on the Scope