Diegelman ATWG AMES 101905

Slide1: 

EXPLORATION INTERNET ARCHITECTURES: BUILDING THE COMMUNICATION OASIS T. Diegelman JSC / DV3 10-19-05

Slide2: 

INTRODUCTION TO PANEL DISCUSSION: AFTER BREATHING AIR, AND FOOD, COMMUNICATION IS THE MOST IMPORTANT RESOURCE ON THE CREWED OASIS SOME OASIS LOCATIONS MAY N0T HAVE CREW SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF “KNOWLEDGE”ABOUT THE “HOW TO” DO A SPACE “INTERNET” IS FOLKLORE AND NOT KNOWLEDGE CHALLENGE TO BUILD OUTWRD USING OASIS CONCEPT IS UNLIKE ANY CHALLENGE IN THE APOLLO OR LEO (SHUTTLE AND ISS) WORK DONE TO DATE BY NASA CONCEPT OF STRATEGIC PLANNING MUST BE COMPLEMENTED BY INTEGRATION ACROSS TRADITIONAL BOUNDARIES, UTILIZING EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES AND CHANGING MISSION ATTRIBUTES

Slide3: 

Some Attributes to consider for roundtable discussion: Constant, seamless expansion of capability First integration of deep space, robotics and human space requirements and system performance Technology revolution in systems components Redundancy / reliability trade Human factors Standards, developed where none exist Risk management Bandwidth /storage / speed / security / rad hardness Open ended development but bounded cost Global in connectivity Not asset location centric May outlive Constellation Program Must integrate into the “system of systems” in Constellation Program When do you build what parts and why – programmatic, technology drivers

Slide4: 

QUESTIONS THAT MUST BE ANSWERED BEFORE SYSTEM INTEGRATION IS APPLIED TO BUILD THE COMMUNICATION “SYSTEM OF SYSTEMS” : WHO ARE THE PLAYERS – FAA? DARPA? Industry? Academia? Does a NASA developed application have commercial potential in this environment? How do we define potential NASA applications – and when? How do we define potential commercial applications – and when? Partnerships –viable? What contractual vehicle Who leads and who follows? Is synergy possible between participants?

Slide5: 

A BROAD SPECTRUM OF FUTURE EXPLORATION MISSIONS REQUIRES INTEGRATED INFRASTRUCTURE Human Robotic Human TECHNOLOGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE MEO GEO LUNAR BEO SBEO LEO Robotic 2005 – 2015 2015 – 2025

Slide6: 

Lunar Manned Crew Exploration Vehicle ISS Complete Lunar Robotic Mars Robotic Deep Space Exploration A NASA Strategic Vision: Synergy, Iteration and Integration 2015 STARTING POINT: GOAL WORKING BACKWARDS: WHAT IS NEEDED ? PROPOSAL DEFINE TASKS, PRODUCTS TO BE DEVELOPED BREAK DOWN BARRIERS- SYNERGIZE Mars Manned

Slide7: 

MCC Operations Strategy for the Exploration of Space (circa 1999) MCC Control Center Constellation Earth Based Operations JSC JPL GSFC Ames MSFC KSC ISS Remote Based Operations ISS JSC JPL GSFC Ames MSFC KSC EARTH GROUND BASE ROVER FUEL PRODUCTION FACILITY MARS MARS VEHICLE EXPERIMENT FACILTY Planetary Constellation Vehicle Based Operations Interstellar Constellation EARTH MOON MARS JUPITER 2010 Lunar 2015 ????

Slide8: 

Advanced Control Center Technologies/ Architecture Business Mechanisms CEV Init Flt 1st Launch Lunar Robotic Orbiter 1st Crewed CEV Flt 1st Human Moon Mission 1st Uncrewed CEV Flt 04 05 06 09 08 07 10 11 12 15 14 13 16 17 18 20 19 Industry/Government Agency Partnering Homeland Defense Distributed Information/ Operations Nuclear Control Rooms Constellation Milestones JSC & Agency Partnering CDDF ICP ECP Space Act BAA CCC IDT SOMD Taskers SBIR/STTR SOMD Development Funds DISTRIBUTED/COLLABORATIVE COMMAND/CONTROL/PLANNING (CCP) Distributed CCP Technology Evaluation Labs Advanced CCP Evaluation Environment Robotic/Human/launch /Space Ops/Surface Ops MOD QUEST Innovation Lab, Industry Technology Benchmarking MOD Jupiter Facility, Display & Application JPL CCP Technology Team, MRL Control Center Ames Technology Test beds (distributed applications ISHM, Human Machine Interface) GSFC LRO control Center team, GMSEC technology team MSFC Advanced Control Center Technology Team KSC Space Port Command Center Team JSC/ER Control Center Situational Awareness, Intelligent Agents JSC CEL Visualization Technologies Human Machine Interface CCP for Robotic Operations + CCP for Human Operations = Wall Street Highly available Distributed Operations DOD Distributed Information/ Operations In situ Operations Off Shore Drilling Technology Test bed can be used for Analog Mission Investigations Evolvable to support Successive spirals Builds upon expertise Of distributed community FY06 Distributed Control Center labs connectivity Messaging architecture demonstrated Initial Asset sharing/interaction capability FY08 Integrated Ontology to support LRO & MRL Plug & Play architecture demonstrated Integrated command/control/planning Architecture demonstrated FY10 Adjustable level of automation in the system Integrated Robotic/Human Planning System FY12 Increase in situ CCP demonstrated Integrated enhanced visualization tools FY14 MCC Operations Strategy for the Exploration of Space ( 2005)

Slide9: 

NEW TECHNOLOGY NEW CAPABILITIES REDEFINED BOUNDARIES ALTERNATE ORG. STRUCTURE OPERATIONS NEW PROCESSES REDEFINED LIMITS DATA REPLACED BY INFO MANAGEMENT DECISION PROCESSES DECISIONAL INFO QUALITY KNOWELDGE FAILED TO PROVIDE IMPROVED INFORMATION LITTLE OR NO OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS TECHNOLOGY FAILEDTO MATURE LESSONS LEARNED - ADD / CHANGE TECHNOLOGY TECHNOLOGY APPEARS TO HAVE PROMISE DEMONSTRATED OPERATIONAL BENEFITS BUSINESS CASE VALIDATED “Gentlemen….Failure IS an Option…..”

Slide10: 

Courtesy: Oracle Corp. A POTENTIAL BUSINESS PLANNING EXERCISE

Slide11: 

CONCLUSION: OPEN FOR DISCUSSION, DIALOGUE AND COLLECTIVE KNOWLEDGE CAPTURE