Presentation Transcript
Indicators 1-12: Indicators 1-12 21-22 January 2008, Bangkok
OECD and the World Bank
Indicator 1 : Indicator 1 What will it achieve?
Increase the number of partner countries with national development strategies that have
Stronger links to a long-term vision
Clearer strategic priorities and a prioritized set of targets
A results-framework linking long-term goals to outcomes and outputs, facilitating the link of the strategy to the budget and a medium-term fiscal framework
Indicator 1: Indicator 1 Target
2005 Baseline 2010 Target 100% 0% 100% 0%
Indicator 1 : Indicator 1
Indicator 1 : Indicator 1
Indicator 1 : Indicator 1
Indicator 1 : Indicator 1
Overview of indicators:
Indicator 1: Operational development strategies
Indicator 2a: Reliable PFM systems Overview of indicators Indicator 11: Results-oriented frameworks Indicator 12: Mutual accountability Indicator 2b: Reliable procurement systems
Indicator 2a : Indicator 2a What will it achieve?
Increase the number of partner countries with public financial management systems that
Ensure that a comprehensive and credible budget is implemented in a predictable and controllable way
Produce timely and accurate accounting and fiscal reporting
Indicator 2a: Indicator 2a Target
Half of partner countries move up at least half a point
Indicator 2a : Indicator 2a
Indicator 2a : Indicator 2a
Indicator 2b : Indicator 2b What will it achieve?
Increase the number of partner countries with procurement systems that
Adhere to broadly accepted good practices
Or have a reform program in place to achieve them
Target
First assessment to be conducted in 2008
Indicator 2b : Indicator 2b
Indicator 3 Aid on Budget (1/3): Indicator 3 Aid on Budget (1/3)
Indicator 3 Aid on Budget (2/3) : Indicator 3 Aid on Budget (2/3) 2005 Baseline Ratio 2010 Target 100% 0% 100% 0%
Indicator 3 Aid on Budget (3/3) : Indicator 3 Aid on Budget (3/3)
Indicator 4 Coordinated Technical Cooperation(1/4) : Indicator 4 Coordinated Technical Cooperation(1/4)
Indicator 4 Coordinated Technical Cooperation (2/4) : Indicator 4 Coordinated Technical Cooperation (2/4) Scope: free-standing and embedded T.C. (SWAPs)
Indicator 4 Coordinated Technical Cooperation(3/4) : Indicator 4 Coordinated Technical Cooperation(3/4) Target: 50% of T.C. are coordinated T.C.
2005 Baseline 2010 Target 100% 0% 100% 0%
Indicator 4 Coordinated Technical Cooperation (4/4) : Indicator 4 Coordinated Technical Cooperation (4/4)
Indicator 5a/5b Using Country Systems (1/5): Indicator 5a/5b Using Country Systems (1/5)
Indicator 5a/5b Using Country Systems (2/6): Indicator 5a/5b Using Country Systems (2/6)
Indicator 5a/5b Using Country Systems (3/5): Indicator 5a/5b Using Country Systems (3/5) 5a PFM systems
Indicator 5a/5b Using Country Systems (4/5): Indicator 5a/5b Using Country Systems (4/5) 5b Procurement systems
Indicator 5a/5b Using Country Systems (5/5): Indicator 5a/5b Using Country Systems (5/5)
Indicator 6 Avoid parallel PIUs (1/3) : Indicator 6 Avoid parallel PIUs (1/3)
Indicator 6 Avoid parallel PIUs (2/3) : Indicator 6 Avoid parallel PIUs (2/3) Target: Reduce by two-third stock of PIUs
2005 Baseline 2010 Target 2000 0% 2000 0%
Indicator 6 Avoid parallel PIUs (3/3) : Indicator 6 Avoid parallel PIUs (3/3)
Indicator 7 In-year predictability (1/3): Indicator 7 In-year predictability (1/3)
Indicator 7 In-year predictability (2/3) : Indicator 7 In-year predictability (2/3) .
2005 Baseline 2010 Target 100% 0% 100% 0%
Indicator 7 In-year predictability (3/3) : Indicator 7 In-year predictability (3/3)
Indicator 8: Untied Aid : Indicator 8: Untied Aid
Indicator 8: Untied Aid : Indicator 8: Untied Aid 2005 Baseline 2010 Target No target set Increase progress over time 100% 0% 100% 0% 75 %
Indicator 9 Programme-based Approaches (1/4): Indicator 9 Programme-based Approaches (1/4)
Indicator 9 Programme-based Approaches (2/4) : Indicator 9 Programme-based Approaches (2/4) 2005 Baseline Ratio 2010 Target 100% 0% 100% 0%
Indicator 9 Programme-based Approaches (3/4) : Indicator 9 Programme-based Approaches (3/4)
Indicator 9 Programme-based Approaches (4/4): Indicator 9 Programme-based Approaches (4/4)
Indicator 9 Programme-based Approaches (3/3) : Indicator 9 Programme-based Approaches (3/3)
Indicator 10a: Joint Missions (1/5) : Indicator 10a: Joint Missions (1/5)
Indicator 10a: Joint Missions (2/5) : Indicator 10a: Joint Missions (2/5) Avoid double counting
Indicator 10a: Joint Missions (3/5) : Indicator 10a: Joint Missions (3/5) Target: 40% of donor missions are joint
2005 Baseline 2010 Target 100% 0% 100% 0%
Indicator 10a: Joint Missions (4/5) : Indicator 10a: Joint Missions (4/5)
Indicator 10a: Joint Missions (5/5) : Indicator 10a: Joint Missions (5/5)
Indicator 11 : Indicator 11 What will it achieve?
Increase the number of partner countries with performance assessment frameworks that
Rely on timely and comprehensive data related to the goals identified in the long-term vision and medium-term strategy
Are transparent and make information systematically available to national stakeholders
Track a manageable number of input, output and outcome indicators and produce unified reports for country policy makers and external partners
Indicator 11: Indicator 11 Target
2005 Baseline 2010 Target 100% 0% 100% 0%
Indicator 11: Indicator 11
Indicator 11 : Indicator 11
Indicator 11 : Indicator 11
Overview of indicators:
Indicator 1: Operational development strategies
Indicator 2a: Reliable PFM systems Overview of indicators Indicator 11: Results-oriented frameworks Indicator 12: Mutual accountability Indicator 2b: Reliable procurement systems
Indicator 12 : Indicator 12 What will it achieve?
Increase the number of partner countries that undertake mutual assessments of progress in implementing agreed commitments on aid effectiveness to
Strengthen accountability of partner and donor countries
Facilitate progress toward Paris Indicators through country-tailored action monitored through an agreed set of indicators
Indicator 12: Indicator 12 Target
2005 Baseline 2010 Target 100% 0% 100% 0%
Indicator 12 : Indicator 12
Beyond the numbers : Beyond the numbers
Good practice examples : Good practice examples
Good practice examples : Good practice examples
Good practice examples : Good practice examples
Good practice examples : Good practice examples