logging in or signing up mesmuses methodology Arundel0 Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 134 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: June 20, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript MESMUSES methodology: MESMUSES methodology Lessons learned and open issues… Alain Michard Florence, June 2003 MESMUSES broad vision: MESMUSES broad vision Just like several other projects SW is all about semantic interoperability Sharing machine-readable terminologies and classification schemes Science and culture are collective and international Semantic Web methodology should be highly relevant for managing and sharing scientific and cultural information Some key S&T issues in the Project: Some key Sandamp;T issues in the Project Model : is RDFS / OWL-Lite adequate ? Schema authoring : method and tools needed ! Metadata : where does it come from ? Automatic Indexing : experiments with a categorizer The basic SW model: The basic SW model Type : texte imprimé, monographie Auteur(s) : Zola, Émile (1840-1902) Titre(s) : L'assommoir [Texte imprimé] / par Emile Zola Edition : 50e éd. Publication : Paris : G. Charpentier, 1878 Description matérielle : 111-569 p. Notice n° : FRBNF35963044 Real-world entities Model and Schema Language: Model and Schema Language Typed attributes are needed XML-Schema types Derived types (e.g.: Celsius temperature, Gregorian date, etc.) Enumerated types, thesauri Time-stamping Cardinality constraints Explicit transitivity of properties (e.g.: geographic inclusion) Schema authoring issues (1): Schema authoring issues (1) Find the right level of abstraction Is « Glucid » a class or an instance ? Or is it sometime a class and sometime an instance ? Avoid the « KR » attitude and practices ! It’s all about indexing resources with shared terminologies, not about representing human knowledge ! Schema authoring issues (2): Schema authoring issues (2) Schema authoring issues (3): Schema authoring issues (3) Schema authoring issues (4): Schema authoring issues (4) Authoring tools are badly needed Graphical representation of the schema Zooming on sub-graphs (hierarchies) Versioning Consider using UML authoring environment ? Established methodology and tutorials are needed Creating Surrogates: Creating Surrogates Data extraction and fusion from structured sources R-DB, XML-DB, LDAP Updating When ? Should not create duplicates ! Detect cross-references Authority lists Thesauri Lexical distance ??? Automatic Categorization: Automatic Categorization Automatic indexing By extracting metadata from resources By automatic categorization Define hierarchies of « concepts » inside the schema Seeding with representative documents Machine learning to create categorizers Pros : enriched search functionality Cons : hierarchies of categories are static Adding a category may change the categorizers of the others Bottom-line…: Bottom-line… RDFS schema authoring may be more difficult than E-R modelling Debates on syntactic features are irrelevant Should be grounded on real-world implementations and testbeds A new query language (e.g.: RQL) is not high priority We have not addressed the « logical rules » layer Semantic Web vs. Community Webs You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
mesmuses methodology Arundel0 Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 134 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: June 20, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript MESMUSES methodology: MESMUSES methodology Lessons learned and open issues… Alain Michard Florence, June 2003 MESMUSES broad vision: MESMUSES broad vision Just like several other projects SW is all about semantic interoperability Sharing machine-readable terminologies and classification schemes Science and culture are collective and international Semantic Web methodology should be highly relevant for managing and sharing scientific and cultural information Some key S&T issues in the Project: Some key Sandamp;T issues in the Project Model : is RDFS / OWL-Lite adequate ? Schema authoring : method and tools needed ! Metadata : where does it come from ? Automatic Indexing : experiments with a categorizer The basic SW model: The basic SW model Type : texte imprimé, monographie Auteur(s) : Zola, Émile (1840-1902) Titre(s) : L'assommoir [Texte imprimé] / par Emile Zola Edition : 50e éd. Publication : Paris : G. Charpentier, 1878 Description matérielle : 111-569 p. Notice n° : FRBNF35963044 Real-world entities Model and Schema Language: Model and Schema Language Typed attributes are needed XML-Schema types Derived types (e.g.: Celsius temperature, Gregorian date, etc.) Enumerated types, thesauri Time-stamping Cardinality constraints Explicit transitivity of properties (e.g.: geographic inclusion) Schema authoring issues (1): Schema authoring issues (1) Find the right level of abstraction Is « Glucid » a class or an instance ? Or is it sometime a class and sometime an instance ? Avoid the « KR » attitude and practices ! It’s all about indexing resources with shared terminologies, not about representing human knowledge ! Schema authoring issues (2): Schema authoring issues (2) Schema authoring issues (3): Schema authoring issues (3) Schema authoring issues (4): Schema authoring issues (4) Authoring tools are badly needed Graphical representation of the schema Zooming on sub-graphs (hierarchies) Versioning Consider using UML authoring environment ? Established methodology and tutorials are needed Creating Surrogates: Creating Surrogates Data extraction and fusion from structured sources R-DB, XML-DB, LDAP Updating When ? Should not create duplicates ! Detect cross-references Authority lists Thesauri Lexical distance ??? Automatic Categorization: Automatic Categorization Automatic indexing By extracting metadata from resources By automatic categorization Define hierarchies of « concepts » inside the schema Seeding with representative documents Machine learning to create categorizers Pros : enriched search functionality Cons : hierarchies of categories are static Adding a category may change the categorizers of the others Bottom-line…: Bottom-line… RDFS schema authoring may be more difficult than E-R modelling Debates on syntactic features are irrelevant Should be grounded on real-world implementations and testbeds A new query language (e.g.: RQL) is not high priority We have not addressed the « logical rules » layer Semantic Web vs. Community Webs