logging in or signing up Nygren TPC symposium Arundel0 Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 154 Category: Product Traini.. License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: June 19, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript A New TPC Application…?: A New TPC Application…? Motivation: next generation 0 - search Implications of 0v 0 are substantial: Neutrino = anti-neutrino (Majorana) Demonstration of lepton number violation Nearly direct measure of mv Significant contribution to cosmology, m Experimental Status: Experimental Status Only one experiment claims detection: Heidelberg-Moscow subgroup, using 76Ge Current experiment is background limited Claim is not widely accepted Challenge: how to reach interesting scale? Cuore, Majorana, Genius, Gem, Moon,….. All rely solely on energy measurement... Two Types of Double Beta Decay: Two Types of Double Beta Decay eutrino helicity must flip Neutrinoless double beta decay lifetime Neutrino mass for 48Ca detectors need high energy resolution: detectors need high energy resolution Spectra from Ludwig DeBraekeleer http://www.wipp.carlsbad.nm.us/science/Workshop/workshoptalks/debraekeleer1/ppframe.htm Theory Practice Spectra from Klapdor Kleingrothaus et. al. Future: Background rejection must be better by a factor of ~103 Sensitivity to mv (time)-1/4 Basic Experimental Challenges: Basic Experimental Challenges How to ensure, before the experiment is built and made operational for an extended period, that the result will not be background limited? No consensus about background rejection! How to design an experiment that will reach the appropriate level of sensitivity at an affordable cost and human time-scale? Scales...: Scales... Sensitive mass: To reach mv ~ 10 meV, 100’s of kg needed condensed matter better than gas... Nuclear matrix elements remain uncertain… safety margin probably a good idea Background rejection: Must be certain before start of experiment! Maybe a new or different approach is needed? Strategy: Energy + Topology: Strategy: Energy + Topology Topology + energy measurement in a liquid medium containing the candidate nuclei Use dielectric or insulating liquid Image capture by ion transport of track Energy measurement by integrating Q of track How well can backgrounds be rejected by topology of low energy electrons in liquid? Topology in Magnetic Field: Topology in Magnetic Field topology in magnetic field is distinctive. Rejection of ,e backgrounds due to: Compton scatter, pair production, nuclear decay decays, neutron scatters, , wimps,…. Radio-purity issues may be much less important Topologies - with magnetic field: Topologies - with magnetic field Compton: Pair production ('V' shape): Decay ('S' shape): Background Studies: Background Studies Background rejection by topology can be measured a priori, by introducing external gamma sources to an operational detector This should be well-established in advance, for a proposed next generation experiment! B Field & Multiple Scattering: B Field andamp; Multiple Scattering Multiple scattering degrades topology - Rough Monte Carlo is encouraging…. Is overall efficiency high enough to be useful? How high a magnetic field? ~2T seems right, (event radius ~ 3mm) Algorithmic strategies to discard kinks due to hard scatters must be developed Potentially Stronger Result: Potentially Stronger Result Background rejection, if high enough, will permit an experimental result that is an energy spectrum which contains both 2- and 0- decay events Energy resolution expected to be ~1- 2% Actual resolution is unknown at present Detector Concept:: Detector Concept: Image capture by ion drift in liquid medium Strong magnetic field to visualize topology Track lengths ~1.5 cm (Q value, of liquid) Ionization level Gfi is low, but OK…maybe Low rate experiment permits slow drift velocity V = ~ 2 cm/second expected @ 4 kV/cm Spatial resolution of ~20 m expected @ 5 cm new kind of TPC-like detector … Detector Concept: … Detector Concept Pixellated readout plane Drift B field Basic Module holds ~1 liter of insulating liquid Pixel size is ~100 x 100 m2 HV: ~20 kV Readout Plane: Readout Plane Pixel size is ~ 100 x 100 m2 Induced signal rises when ion cluster nears For vdrift = 2 cm/s, ~ 5 msec electronic bandwidth andlt; 1 kHz low-noise low-power circuitry OK Raster scan of integrated Q @ 400 Hz Many Challenging Issues...: Many Challenging Issues... How useful is topology? Which isotope is practical? Is the chemistry of liquid acceptable? Is the ionization level high enough? Is energy resolution OK? (Gfi is f(E field)) Do ions display unique drift velocities? Is the intrinsic 'noise' of the liquid OK? Challenges...: Challenges... How to measure the drift coordinate? Diffusion of track may be good enough,… Maybe the liquid scintillates a little,… Can practical detector modules be made? Pixel readout noise must be ~ 5 e- rms. Raw data rates, at module, ~50 Mbytes/s Filtered data, from module, ~ 10 kbytes/s Are negative ions better than positive? Which isotope?: Which isotope? 48Ca is attractive: Lowest Z (20), Highest Q (4.3 MeV) However: natural abundance very low: 0.2% Not many insulating liquids with Ca in them Nuclear matrix element unfavorable Other Possible Isotopes: Other Possible Isotopes 96Zr (2.8% abundance), Z=40, Q=3.35 MeV 82Se (8.7% abundance), Z=34, Q = 3.0 MeV Selenium 82 may be best choice… Enrichment methodology may exist for these isotopes, needs exploration... Ion Drift in Insulating Liquids: Ion Drift in Insulating Liquids No basic reason why low drift velocity Vd is inappropriate for low rate experiments Is ion drift velocity Vd single-valued? Solvation may introduce range of values... Ion yield may be ~1 ion pair per 200 eV ~15,000 ion pairs per 0 decay (82Se) ~100 ion pairs per measurement along track Detector R&D: Motivations : Detector Randamp;D: Motivations Double beta-decay process is regarded as a very high priority scientific objective Several nuclei should be studied to reduce systematic errors in interpretation of mv Several experiments are justifiable Scaling of experiment from prototype to final size is an important consideration R&D Plans...: Randamp;D Plans... Laboratory Randamp;D funds at LLNL have been awarded to study the general characteristics of imaging minimum ionizing tracks in dielectric liquids (LLNL: Adam Bernstein) Physical chemists have studied ion transport in dielectric liquids using relatively large pulsed radiation sources; - will seek experts Summary: Summary Idea still rudimentary, but is possibly an innovation that can extend sensitivity of 0v Detector Randamp;D issues not costly to explore Good scaling behavior, as 1 N modules Other proposed next-generation techniques not shown to have adequate background rejection! You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
Nygren TPC symposium Arundel0 Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 154 Category: Product Traini.. License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: June 19, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript A New TPC Application…?: A New TPC Application…? Motivation: next generation 0 - search Implications of 0v 0 are substantial: Neutrino = anti-neutrino (Majorana) Demonstration of lepton number violation Nearly direct measure of mv Significant contribution to cosmology, m Experimental Status: Experimental Status Only one experiment claims detection: Heidelberg-Moscow subgroup, using 76Ge Current experiment is background limited Claim is not widely accepted Challenge: how to reach interesting scale? Cuore, Majorana, Genius, Gem, Moon,….. All rely solely on energy measurement... Two Types of Double Beta Decay: Two Types of Double Beta Decay eutrino helicity must flip Neutrinoless double beta decay lifetime Neutrino mass for 48Ca detectors need high energy resolution: detectors need high energy resolution Spectra from Ludwig DeBraekeleer http://www.wipp.carlsbad.nm.us/science/Workshop/workshoptalks/debraekeleer1/ppframe.htm Theory Practice Spectra from Klapdor Kleingrothaus et. al. Future: Background rejection must be better by a factor of ~103 Sensitivity to mv (time)-1/4 Basic Experimental Challenges: Basic Experimental Challenges How to ensure, before the experiment is built and made operational for an extended period, that the result will not be background limited? No consensus about background rejection! How to design an experiment that will reach the appropriate level of sensitivity at an affordable cost and human time-scale? Scales...: Scales... Sensitive mass: To reach mv ~ 10 meV, 100’s of kg needed condensed matter better than gas... Nuclear matrix elements remain uncertain… safety margin probably a good idea Background rejection: Must be certain before start of experiment! Maybe a new or different approach is needed? Strategy: Energy + Topology: Strategy: Energy + Topology Topology + energy measurement in a liquid medium containing the candidate nuclei Use dielectric or insulating liquid Image capture by ion transport of track Energy measurement by integrating Q of track How well can backgrounds be rejected by topology of low energy electrons in liquid? Topology in Magnetic Field: Topology in Magnetic Field topology in magnetic field is distinctive. Rejection of ,e backgrounds due to: Compton scatter, pair production, nuclear decay decays, neutron scatters, , wimps,…. Radio-purity issues may be much less important Topologies - with magnetic field: Topologies - with magnetic field Compton: Pair production ('V' shape): Decay ('S' shape): Background Studies: Background Studies Background rejection by topology can be measured a priori, by introducing external gamma sources to an operational detector This should be well-established in advance, for a proposed next generation experiment! B Field & Multiple Scattering: B Field andamp; Multiple Scattering Multiple scattering degrades topology - Rough Monte Carlo is encouraging…. Is overall efficiency high enough to be useful? How high a magnetic field? ~2T seems right, (event radius ~ 3mm) Algorithmic strategies to discard kinks due to hard scatters must be developed Potentially Stronger Result: Potentially Stronger Result Background rejection, if high enough, will permit an experimental result that is an energy spectrum which contains both 2- and 0- decay events Energy resolution expected to be ~1- 2% Actual resolution is unknown at present Detector Concept:: Detector Concept: Image capture by ion drift in liquid medium Strong magnetic field to visualize topology Track lengths ~1.5 cm (Q value, of liquid) Ionization level Gfi is low, but OK…maybe Low rate experiment permits slow drift velocity V = ~ 2 cm/second expected @ 4 kV/cm Spatial resolution of ~20 m expected @ 5 cm new kind of TPC-like detector … Detector Concept: … Detector Concept Pixellated readout plane Drift B field Basic Module holds ~1 liter of insulating liquid Pixel size is ~100 x 100 m2 HV: ~20 kV Readout Plane: Readout Plane Pixel size is ~ 100 x 100 m2 Induced signal rises when ion cluster nears For vdrift = 2 cm/s, ~ 5 msec electronic bandwidth andlt; 1 kHz low-noise low-power circuitry OK Raster scan of integrated Q @ 400 Hz Many Challenging Issues...: Many Challenging Issues... How useful is topology? Which isotope is practical? Is the chemistry of liquid acceptable? Is the ionization level high enough? Is energy resolution OK? (Gfi is f(E field)) Do ions display unique drift velocities? Is the intrinsic 'noise' of the liquid OK? Challenges...: Challenges... How to measure the drift coordinate? Diffusion of track may be good enough,… Maybe the liquid scintillates a little,… Can practical detector modules be made? Pixel readout noise must be ~ 5 e- rms. Raw data rates, at module, ~50 Mbytes/s Filtered data, from module, ~ 10 kbytes/s Are negative ions better than positive? Which isotope?: Which isotope? 48Ca is attractive: Lowest Z (20), Highest Q (4.3 MeV) However: natural abundance very low: 0.2% Not many insulating liquids with Ca in them Nuclear matrix element unfavorable Other Possible Isotopes: Other Possible Isotopes 96Zr (2.8% abundance), Z=40, Q=3.35 MeV 82Se (8.7% abundance), Z=34, Q = 3.0 MeV Selenium 82 may be best choice… Enrichment methodology may exist for these isotopes, needs exploration... Ion Drift in Insulating Liquids: Ion Drift in Insulating Liquids No basic reason why low drift velocity Vd is inappropriate for low rate experiments Is ion drift velocity Vd single-valued? Solvation may introduce range of values... Ion yield may be ~1 ion pair per 200 eV ~15,000 ion pairs per 0 decay (82Se) ~100 ion pairs per measurement along track Detector R&D: Motivations : Detector Randamp;D: Motivations Double beta-decay process is regarded as a very high priority scientific objective Several nuclei should be studied to reduce systematic errors in interpretation of mv Several experiments are justifiable Scaling of experiment from prototype to final size is an important consideration R&D Plans...: Randamp;D Plans... Laboratory Randamp;D funds at LLNL have been awarded to study the general characteristics of imaging minimum ionizing tracks in dielectric liquids (LLNL: Adam Bernstein) Physical chemists have studied ion transport in dielectric liquids using relatively large pulsed radiation sources; - will seek experts Summary: Summary Idea still rudimentary, but is possibly an innovation that can extend sensitivity of 0v Detector Randamp;D issues not costly to explore Good scaling behavior, as 1 N modules Other proposed next-generation techniques not shown to have adequate background rejection!