authorSTREAM Share PowerPoint. Anywhere

Johnson

Uploaded from authorPOINT Lite
Download as Download Not Available PPT
Presentation Description

No description available

What's up on authorSTREAM?
Views: 59
Like it  ( Likes) Dislike it  ( Dislikes)
Added: March 06, 2008 This presentation is Public
Presentation Category :Education
Presentation StatisticsNew!
Views on authorSTREAM: 59
Presentation Transcript

Mobile phone technology use in school science enquiry indoors and out-of-doors; implications for pedagogy : Mobile phone technology use in school science enquiry indoors and out-of-doors; implications for pedagogy Susan Johnson Institute of Education s.johnson@ioe.ac.uk


Introduction : Context 4 schools participated in the PlaSciGardens – EU funded project June 2006 and 2007 scientific enquiry indoors and out-of-doors at Kew Gardens children (9-10 year olds) organised in small groups Objectives Aid engagement Children using meaningful investigative skills Data collecting options; camera, audio recording, texting and a call-up from an information store. Pedagogy relevant to management of whole classes out of doors Introduction


Research questions : Research questions What conceptual understanding did children gain during scientific enquiry indoors and out-of-doors using MPT? How can teachers’ pedagogy be changed from offering desk bound, passive learning of facts and concepts to science enquiry and argumentation in groups?


Research methodology : Research design Groups placed vegetable specimens in “family” boxes. Compared each collection with plants growing in order beds and Kew students’ allotments. MPT contributions placed in a “linear gallery” as children contributed data. Tool Nokia phone, (excluding call functions) with camera, audio recording, texting and a call-up from an information store, data collecting options. Methods Children shared a phone (social/ argumentation interaction). Used the functions as they wished (independence). collected data at will (independence) Data sent to the OOKL website (potential for reflection). Research methodology


Research methodology : Audio recordings 16. We have discovered that tomatoes and deadly nightshade are in the same family because of the shape of the actual plant [flowers?] (fact) 17. The flowers are very similar to a courgette flower but much, much…the courgette flower is absolutely huge. (fact & reflection) 22. Tomatoes are very juicy and are not vegetables they are actually a fruit, so if you see a tomato tell your friends or your mum it’s a [recording ends – fruit?] (fact) 25. We have decided to take out the squash/pumpkin because of the scale of the flower and the look of the flower. (reflection) 30. We have kept the pepper, chilli and the tomatoes. (reflection) Research methodology


Critique/ reflections : Critique/ reflections Issues This research was a secondary to other project partners objectives i.e. Kew organised the day; Data collection relied on plants being available (co-operation of botanic gardens); Collaboration (teachers’ criteria for grouping); Grouping influences fine detail of data analysis; Helpers eager to tell children what to record (better briefing essential); Visit facilitators must hold constructivist attitudes to learning with MPT (BG CPD using MPT vital); Reporting: in EU project final report – potential for change?


Critique/ reflections : Critique/ reflections What worked Recall of a science investigation MPT functions related to pedagogical outcomes that can be achieved without the teacher. Eg. Call-up information: allows children to “discover knowledge” about a plant while standing next to it. They can observe characteristics mentioned themselves; is written by plant experts; overcomes teachers’ lack of knowledge; can (if well constructed) prompt further activities.


Critique/ reflections : Critique/ reflections What didn’t work teachers did not access OOKL website (http://www.ookl.org.uk) at school – their own technophobia + underestimation of children’s ability with technology? disregard for pedagogical outcomes: children’s ownership of contributions, their scientific understanding and misconceptions. they did not use the data for assessing learning


Critique/ reflections : Critique/ reflections Recommendation Teachers will need CPD with access to tools that support children’s engagement and conceptual understanding and experience of: group work out-of-doors; investigation and inductive reasoning; information collection and organisation; argumentation and reflection to clarify understanding; and positive reinforcement to show children can work independently


Critique/ reflections : Critique/ reflections Open questions