logging in or signing up Andrey Uroda Alohomora Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 34 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (1) Dislike it (0) Added: October 26, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Andrey Uroda, The University of HK: Borders Bridging Degrees: Two University Dual Degree Programs between Harbin and Vladivostok Andrey Uroda, The University of HK VladivostokCross-Border Education: What?: Cross-Border Education: What? Two Bachelor degrees upon completion from a single program, jointly designed by partners (Mutually) Recognized and accredited by both states (China and Russia) 5 years (2.5+2.5 or 1+2+2) years timeline with different variations Both directions, but only Chinese students going to Russia are considered hereTwo Cross-Border Partnerships: Two Cross-Border PartnershipsA note on methodology: A note on methodology Documentary analysis goes hand in hand with the interview data: it is not only an issue to re-check the validity, but is also necessary to apply due to the nature of Chinese and Russian educational and cultural environmentTransnational Education and Cross-Border Partnering: Differences in approaches in China and Russia: Transnational Education and Cross-Border Partnering: Differences in approaches in China and Russia China: Policy-making for transnational education is based on gathering real institutional experiences and practices, i.e. it is to a large extent not top-down; Under constant revision through inspections, highlighting best practices and getting updated; Practically, it looks like highlighting “4+0” pattern with foreign degrees rather than “2+2” or “3+1”, i.e. student mobility is less encouraged (because it is less possible?) at the recent time (2006) Transnational Education and Cross-Border Partnering: Differences in approaches in China and Russia: Transnational Education and Cross-Border Partnering: Differences in approaches in China and Russia Russia: Western bias and Bologna Process orientation; Under-represented and under-estimated scope of co-operation with the East Asia; Centralized control does not encompass the cross-border education, no resources; and Obviously, there is no clear policy on transnational educationLanguage Situation: Language Situation No alternative to Russian language observed Unanimous favoring priority (but not contrasting profession!) of the language in the curriculum: 40% of contents; and students’ study load (mean about 65%) Exceptional situation to arrange qualified training from zero level difficulties in admission and longer time to degreeJoint programs with foreign partners in Heilongjiang Province (early 2006): Joint programs with foreign partners in Heilongjiang Province (early 2006) Sources: http://www.cfce.cn, interview, authorConclusions: Conclusions Different rationales, but common business and common goals in playing in the shared market The institutional level is crucial; China: credentialism-oriented, competition increases; Russia: financial drive with elements of credentialism (increasing) You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
Andrey Uroda Alohomora Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 34 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (1) Dislike it (0) Added: October 26, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Andrey Uroda, The University of HK: Borders Bridging Degrees: Two University Dual Degree Programs between Harbin and Vladivostok Andrey Uroda, The University of HK VladivostokCross-Border Education: What?: Cross-Border Education: What? Two Bachelor degrees upon completion from a single program, jointly designed by partners (Mutually) Recognized and accredited by both states (China and Russia) 5 years (2.5+2.5 or 1+2+2) years timeline with different variations Both directions, but only Chinese students going to Russia are considered hereTwo Cross-Border Partnerships: Two Cross-Border PartnershipsA note on methodology: A note on methodology Documentary analysis goes hand in hand with the interview data: it is not only an issue to re-check the validity, but is also necessary to apply due to the nature of Chinese and Russian educational and cultural environmentTransnational Education and Cross-Border Partnering: Differences in approaches in China and Russia: Transnational Education and Cross-Border Partnering: Differences in approaches in China and Russia China: Policy-making for transnational education is based on gathering real institutional experiences and practices, i.e. it is to a large extent not top-down; Under constant revision through inspections, highlighting best practices and getting updated; Practically, it looks like highlighting “4+0” pattern with foreign degrees rather than “2+2” or “3+1”, i.e. student mobility is less encouraged (because it is less possible?) at the recent time (2006) Transnational Education and Cross-Border Partnering: Differences in approaches in China and Russia: Transnational Education and Cross-Border Partnering: Differences in approaches in China and Russia Russia: Western bias and Bologna Process orientation; Under-represented and under-estimated scope of co-operation with the East Asia; Centralized control does not encompass the cross-border education, no resources; and Obviously, there is no clear policy on transnational educationLanguage Situation: Language Situation No alternative to Russian language observed Unanimous favoring priority (but not contrasting profession!) of the language in the curriculum: 40% of contents; and students’ study load (mean about 65%) Exceptional situation to arrange qualified training from zero level difficulties in admission and longer time to degreeJoint programs with foreign partners in Heilongjiang Province (early 2006): Joint programs with foreign partners in Heilongjiang Province (early 2006) Sources: http://www.cfce.cn, interview, authorConclusions: Conclusions Different rationales, but common business and common goals in playing in the shared market The institutional level is crucial; China: credentialism-oriented, competition increases; Russia: financial drive with elements of credentialism (increasing)