LIFEPROJECTMETHOD

Views:
 
Category: Entertainment
     
 

Presentation Description

online dating, social networking, strict personality similarity, personality profiling, matchmaking, high precision method

Comments

Presentation Transcript

PowerPoint Presentation:

A NEW WAY TO KNOW PEOPLE. A NEW WAY TO MEET PEOPLE. A NEW WAY TO MAKE FRIENDS (on line dating). A NEW WAY TO MAKE A NET (social networking). with 16PF5 normative personality test or similar BY STRICT PERSONALITY SIMILARITY Also suitable for Personality-based Recommender System s . 2013 http://vator.tv/c/13a5 LIFEPROJECT People like you Predictable people

PowerPoint Presentation:

LIFEPROJECT method OTHER PLAYERS Reliability (high precision) FREE MEDIUM HIGH Very HIGH LOW Annual price LOW MEDIUM HIGH Very HIGH

PowerPoint Presentation:

Innovative method for online dating / social networking Predictable people. [ compatible real persons ] Uses 16PF5 (or similar test) to assess personality, the same tests that are used to evaluate candidates for a job. The report is mathematically codified using advanced math equations, and this result is disposed in a matrix form. A high speed server arrangement or a high speed computer, compares the matrix of one client with the matrices of the other clients. For 100,000 clients needs over 5,000,000,000 of matricial comparisons. For 1,000,000 clients needs over 500,000,000,000 of matricial comparisons. Very reliable, 1 person will have a high level of compatibility with no more than 3 in 100,000 / 12 in 1,000,000 OR the 3 most compatible in 100,000 persons!!! Subscription per year (renewable). Business Intelligence using the data base with the personality of the clients, that never expires. Also suitable for Personality-based Recommender System s . Fernando Ardenghi Buenos Aires, Argentina ardenghifer @ gmail.com Version: 16.00 ------ 201 3

PowerPoint Presentation:

Online Dating Sites can be classified as: Online Dating 1.0 : First Generation "Browsing/Searching Options, Powerful Searching Engines" Online Dating 1.5: Hybrid ; "Unidirectional Recommendation Engines", sites like HotorNot . Online Dating 2.0 : Second Generation "Matching based on Self-Reported Data / Bidirectional or Behavioral Recommendation Engines" e.g. PerfectMatch , uses an ipsative instrument based on MBTI test. RewardingLove also. Online Dating 3.0 : Third Generation "Compatibility Matching Algorithms" e.g. eHarmony , uses a normative version of the Big5 to assess personality and Dyadic Adjustment Scale to calculate compatibility. The U.S. site is different from the UK site, Australian site, Canadian site, etc.

PowerPoint Presentation:

Three words in compatibility matching methods. Three words with different meanings for different persons or companies! Compatibility Personality Similarity Sometimes the word compatibility means a high degree of similarity between several variables (religion, education, income, personality, likes and dislikes, etc.) of prospective mates; sometimes compatibility means a mix of similarity and complementarity between variables; sometimes when a dating site says compatibility or even chemistry, nobody really knows exactly what it means! Some online dating sites offering compatibility matching methods use the word similarity as: "a proprietary Dyadic Adjustment Scale", others mean: "a proprietary multivariate linear regression equation", some say a mix of similarity and complementarity meaning: "a proprietary multivariate logistic regression equation", still others mix similarity and complementarity meaning: "a proprietary equation to calculate compatibility between prospective mates!" Personality could be assessed by different methods. No actual online dating site offering compatibility matching methods uses the 16PF5 normative test or similar like 15FQ+ available in different languages, the 5th version actualized after Census 2000.

PowerPoint Presentation:

Since the beginning of 2003, I had been testing online dating sites offering compatibility matching methods to their daters by creating dummy Male/Female profiles and using them as test points for reverse engineering purposes. No actual online dating site offering compatibility matching methods uses the 16PF5 normative test available in different languages, the 5th version actualized after Census 2000. Those sites are using the Big Five, or other proprietary models instead (like Chemistry or PerfectMatch), to measure personality traits, and all of those tests are more simplified versions than the 16PF5. No actual online dating site offering compatibility matching methods measures the 16 personality factors as established by Dr. Raymond Cattell in 1949. Actual online dating sites offering compatibility matching methods are only fueled by big marketing budgets and not by serious scientific evidence . No one ( eHarmony, eDarling, Chemistry, PerfectMatch, PlentyOfFish Chemistry Predictor, Meetic, Be2, Parship ) can prove its matching algorithm can match prospective partners who will have more stable and satisfying relationships than couples matched by chance, astrological destiny, personal preferences, searching on one's own, or other technique as the control group in a peer_reviewed Scientific Paper. They are all like placebo, because * Actual online dating sites offering compatibility matching methods, when calculating compatibility between prospective mates, have less or at least the same precision as searching on one's own. [ in the range of 3 or 4 persons compatible per 1,000 persons screened ] * That is because they use: a) simplified versions of personality traits, instead of the 16PF5 or similar with the complete inventory (16 variables) b) inadequate quantitative methods to calculate compatibility between prospective mates, like eHarmony which uses Dyadic Adjustment Scale or other sites which use multivariate linear / logistic regression equations o other equations.

PowerPoint Presentation:

To solve that problem I propose: *) the 16PF5 or similar normative personality test to measure personality of normal persons over 26 years old interested in serious dating. *) a new quantitative method to calculate compatibility between prospective mates , based on quantized pattern comparison (part of pattern recognition by correlation) named LIFEPROJECT method. The value of my algorithm is to achieve far more precision than searching on one's own [ in the range of 3 persons compatible per 100,000 persons screened ] and try to prove if only high level on personality* similarity* between mates is the core of relationship stability and satisfaction for normal persons over 26 years old interested in serious dating. *personality : measured with the 16PF5 normative test in different languages. *similarity : calculated using the method I had invented, LIFEPROJECT method. Scientific research that could substantiate the method at http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com

PowerPoint Presentation:

- LIFEPROJECT method : * Multi-language tests 16PF5 or similar like 15FQ+ or CPpro. Afrikaans, Chinese, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English for Australia, English for Canada, English for India, English for South Africa, English for the United Kingdom, English for the United States, Filipino, French, German, Greek, Italian, Japanese, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese (European and New World), Portuguese of Brazil, Spanish (Castilian), Spanish-American, Swedish, Slovak, Turkish. * Ensemble (whole set of different valid possibilities): 1 * E16 with 16PF5 * Precision: better than 0.00000001% with Self-Adjustment ** 3 most compatible persons in a 100,000 persons database, ** 12 most compatible persons in a 1,000,000 persons database, ** 48 most compatible persons in a 10,000,000 persons database, Results are displayed with 2 integers + 8 decimals, like 92.55033557% +/- 0.00000001% * For a 1,000,000 persons Database. Number of Comparisons == (1,000,000)raisedto2 / 2 == 500,000,000,000 each one to predict relationship satisfaction between persons. If the computer (or high_speed server arrangement) calculates the value of relationship_satisfaction_between_prospective_mates as fast as 1,000,000 per second, it will require 500,000 seconds, nearly 139 hours!!! The World Population (WP) is nearly 7,000 millions persons == 7.0 * E9 16PF5's Ensemble == 1 * E16 WP / Ensemble == (7.0 * E9) / (1 * E16) == 7.0 * E-7 == 0.70 * E-6 i.e. All World Population is 0.70 micro part of the Ensemble!!!

PowerPoint Presentation:

Assumptions 1st year Normal scenario : 100,000 new world subscribers at USD 300 . 1st year Worst scenario : 5 0,000 new world subscribers at USD 300 . 1st year Best scenario : 1 5 0,000 new world subscribers at USD 300 . 2nd year : 1 5 0,000 new world subscribers at USD 300 + 70% renewal 1st year at USD 30 . 3rd year : 200 ,000 new world subscribers at USD 300 + 70% renewal 2nd year at USD 30 . 4th year : 300 ,000 new world subscribers at USD 300 + 70% renewal 3rd year at USD 30 . 5th year : 400 ,000 new world subscribers at USD 300 + 70% renewal 4th year at USD 30 . 100% of the clients pay his/her subscription, otherwise can’t contact others.

PowerPoint Presentation:

costs per one subscription 1st year Normal scenario 1st year Best scenario 1st year Worst scenario 2nd year normal 3rd year normal 4th year normal 5th year normal Direct cost (tests + computer use) USD 22 USD 50 USD 45 USD 30 USD 30 USD 30 USD 30 Selling & Advertising USD 62 USD 57 USD 124 USD 48 USD 48 USD 48 USD 48 General Administ. Salaries USD 31 USD 40 USD 44 USD 42 USD 40 USD 37 unitary cost (one subscription ) USD 115 USD 146 USD 232 USD 122 USD 120 USD 118 USD 115 Selling price (subscription) USD 300 USD 300 USD 300 USD 300 USD 300 USD 300 USD 300 profit per one subscription USD 185 USD 154 USD 68 USD 178 USD 180 USD 182 USD 185 profit per one subscription (%) 160% 105% 29% 146% 150% 154% 161% USD 63

PowerPoint Presentation:

In thousands USD 1st year Normal scenario 1st year Best scenario 1st year Worst scenario 2nd year normal 3rd year normal 4th year normal 5th year normal Income / Revenue (NEW+RENEWAL subscribers) 30,000 60,000 15,000 47,100 63,150 94,200 126,300 Income less direct costs 27,750 50,040 12,790 42,390 56,835 84,780 113,670 Income less direct & s elling costs 21,520 38,540 6,560 34,854 46,731 69,708 93,462 18,495 30,520 3,661 27,873 37,984 57,546 77,769 TAX 40% 7,456 12,146 1,403 11,149 15,194 23,019 31,108 Earnings After Tax 10,888 18,223 2,107 16,724 22,791 34,527 46,661 Earnings / Income 36.29% 30.37% 14.05% 35.51% 36.09% 36.65% 36.94% Income less direct, selling, Op, G&A costs before Tax

PowerPoint Presentation:

(here only a sample, but using the real algorithm, real values, pilot proof) PERSONALITY PATTERN Client #01 ---- 16PF5 Profile 6.7.6.8.9.6.7.7.8.7.2.5.8.7.3.4 Client #02 ---- 16PF5 Profile 5.7.4.8.7.4.5.6.4.6.8.9.6.8.4.4 Client #03 ---- 16PF5 Profile 2.5.4.6.3.8.7.6.3.9.9.8.2.5.5.6 Client #04 ---- 16PF5 Profile 7.7.6.8.8.7.6.5.8.7.4.5.7.7.3.4 Client #05 ---- 16PF5 Profile 4.9.5.4.1.3.4.9.7.8.7.5.6.7.9.10 Client #06 ---- 16PF5 Profile 8.6.3.5.2.9.6.9.3.6.7.5.5.7.7.4 Comparison data base ( Using LIFEPROJECT method algorithm ) #01 to #02 == 74.79865772% #01 to #03 == 54.09395973% #02 to #03 == 63 . 59060403% #01 to #04 == 92.55033557% #02 to #04 == 75 . 26845638% #03 to #04 == 54 . 89932886% #01 to #05 == 57.71812081% #02 to #05 == 61 . 00671141% #03 to #05 == 49 . 49664430% #01 to #06 == 59 . 73154362% #02 to #06 == 65 . 90604027% #03 to #06 == 67 . 34899329% #04 to #05 == 56 . 54362416% #04 to #06 == 64 . 42953020% #05 to #06 == 62 . 18120805%

PowerPoint Presentation:

WorldWide, there are over 5,000 -five thousand- online dating sites but no one can show Compatibility Distribution Curves to each and every of its members!

PowerPoint Presentation:

FERNANDO ARDENGHI -- RESUMÉ Fernando Ardenghi (40+, electronic engineer UTN 1995) has 15+ years experience in Information Technology and 10+ years experience in the Online Dating Industry. Fernando has also entrepreneurial studies at Universidad de San Andrés, Universidad de Buenos Aires and Universidad del CEMA. e-mail to: ardenghifer@gmail.com http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com

authorStream Live Help